Effect of annual influenza immunization on antibody response in lung transplant patients

Antibody responses to influenza vaccine in pre- and post-lung transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Although pre-transplant immunization is routinely recommended, this recommendation is based on little data. The primary objective of this study was to compare antibody responses in lung transplant patients who received influenza vaccine before the transplant, within the first six months of transplant, between 13 and 60 months post-transplant, and 110 months or beyond transplant.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 357 total immunization events performed over five yr to measure H1N1, H3N2, and B antibody responses to the influenza vaccine in pre- and post-lung transplant patients. Geometric mean titers, seroprotection (antibody titer at least 1:40), seroconversion (fourfold increase between pre and post), and mean fold increases were compared.

RESULTS

The geometric mean titer distributions were different for H3N2 and B (ANOVA; p = 0.002 for both). Pre-transplant antibody concentrations were higher compared to the 13- to 60-month group for H3N2 (corrected p = 0.002) and the healthy group for B (corrected p = 0.001). The ≥110-month group had higher seroconversion rates compared to the 13- to 60-month group for H3N2 and B viruses.

CONCLUSION

Lung pre-transplant patients and the long-term survivors have higher responses to the influenza vaccine than early post-transplant and the transplant control groups.

Persistence of influenza vaccine-induced antibody in lung transplant patients and healthy individuals beyond the season

BACKGROUND

The timing of influenza vaccination and susceptibility to re-circulating virus in the population is influenced by the persistence of seroprotection. Immunosuppressed transplant patients are known to have lower antibody response rates than healthy individuals, but acceptable antibody concentrations are achieved. The duration of this seroprotection beyond a single season has not been evaluated in either healthy or immunosuppressed populations.

METHODS

Influenza antibody concentrations against viruses no longer included in the vaccine were measured in serum by hemagglutination inhibition assay annually following vaccination of 73 lung transplant participants and 27 healthy controls. Seroprotection was defined as a titer of ≥ 1:40 and was compared between groups over the measured term using Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Seroprotection rates for influenza A and B strains at one year following immunization were 100% for lung transplant and healthy controls. Rates at two years for the influenza A strains were 65-74% for lung transplant vs. 77-100% in healthy controls. Rates for influenza B strains two years following immunization were 27-50% for lung transplant vs. 16-38% in healthy controls. (Fisher's exact test; not significant for between group comparisons; p < 0.05 for between season comparisons)

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccine-induced antibody persistence appears to be influenced more by the vaccine virus strain than the immune status of the vaccinated individuals. Seroprotection rates are high 12 mo following influenza vaccination but wane over the second year, particularly for influenza B viruses. Annual influenza immunization is indicated, even for healthy individuals and even when the vaccine viruses do not change.

Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis by etiology

Many national guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination of immunocompromised patients, although the decision to vaccinate is usually at clinical discretion. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the evidence for influenza vaccination in this group, and we report our results by etiology. Meta-analyses showed significantly lower odds of influenza-like illness after vaccination in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, patients with cancer, and transplant recipients and of laboratory-confirmed influenza in HIV-positive patients, compared with patients receiving placebo or no vaccination. Pooled odds of seroconversion and seroprotection were typically lower in HIV-positive patients, patients with cancer, and transplant recipients, compared with immunocompetent controls. Vaccination was generally well tolerated, with variation in mild adverse events between etiological groups. Limited evidence of a transient increase in viremia and a decrease in the percentage of CD4(+) cells in HIV-positive patients was found although not accompanied by worsening of clinical symptoms. Clinical judgment remains important when discussing the benefits and safety profile with immunocompromised patients.

Increased mortality of solid organ transplant recipients with H1N1 infection: a single center experience

Immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients are included in the cohort at increased risk for complications of viral infections such as the newly encountered H1N1. A retrospective review was performed to collect data on patients hospitalized during a recent H1N1 epidemic. H1N1 was suspected based on symptoms and real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay confirmed the diagnosis. From August through October of 2009, 89 patients were admitted to The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, with H1N1. Eighteen were solid organ transplant recipients with an age range of 34-69 yr. This group included nine kidney, five lung, one kidney-pancreas, one liver, and two heart recipients. Severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities existed in over half of non-transplant patients, while only eight of these non-transplant patients were otherwise healthy. Eighty-nine percent of transplant patients presented with fever or chills, 72% with cough, and 56% with gastrointestinal distress. Symptoms were similar to non-transplant patients. All transplant patients were treated with oseltamivir. Two non-transplant patients and three transplant patients died. Thirty-day survival was 97% in non-transplant and 83% in transplant patients (p=0.02). In the context of an initial epidemic of H1N1, infection was associated with increased risk of complications and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients.

Low-dose intradermal versus intramuscular trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In this study we compared the immunogenicity of influenza vaccine administered intradermally to the standard intramuscular vaccination in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive the trivalent inactivated seasonal 2008-9 influenza vaccine containing either 6 μg (intradermal) or 15 μg (intramuscular) of hemagglutinin per viral strain. Immunogenicity was assessed by measurement of geometric mean titer of antibodies using the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assay. Vaccine response was defined as a 4-fold or higher increase of antibody titers to at least one vaccine antigen.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients received either the intradermal (n = 41) or intramuscular (n = 44) vaccine. Vaccine response was seen in 6 of 41 patients (14.6%) in the intradermal vs 8 of 43 (18.6%) in the intramuscular group (p = 0.77). Seroprotection (HI ≥ 1:32) was 39% for H1N1, 83% for H3N2 and 29% for B strain in the intradermal group vs 28% for H1N1, 98% for H3N2 and 58% for B strain in the intramuscular group (p = 0.36 for H1N1, p = 0.02 for H3N2, p < 0.01 for B). Mild adverse events were seen in 44% of patients in the intradermal group and 34% in the intramuscular group (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunogenicity of the 2008-9 influenza vaccine given intradermally or intramuscularly was overall poor in lung transplant recipients. Novel strategies for influenza vaccination in this population are needed.