Exley J, Hanson C, Umar N, Willey B, Shuaibu A, Marchant T. Provision of essential evidence-based interventions during facility-based childbirth: cross-sectional observations of births in northeast Nigeria.
BMJ Open 2020;
10:e037625. [PMID:
33099494 PMCID:
PMC7590366 DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037625]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To measure the provision of evidence-based preventive and promotive interventions to women, and subsequently their newborns, during childbirth in a high-mortality setting.
DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS
Cross-sectional observations of care provided to women, and their newborns during the intrapartum and immediate postpartum period using a standardised checklist capturing healthcare worker behaviours regarding lifesaving and respectful care.
SETTING
Ten primary healthcare facilities in Gombe state, northeast Nigeria. The northeast region of Nigeria has some of the highest maternal and newborn death rates globally.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Data on 50 measures of internationally recommended evidence-based interventions and good practice.
RESULTS
1875 women were admitted to a health facility during the observation period; of these, 1804 gave birth in the facility and did not experience an adverse event or death. Many clinical interventions around the time of birth were routinely implemented, including provision of uterotonic (96% (95% CI 93% to 98%)), whereas risk-assessment measures, such as history-taking or checking vital signs were rarely completed: just 2% (95% CI 2% to 7%) of women had their temperature taken and 12% (95% CI 9% to 16%) were asked about complications during the pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of women did not receive the recommended routine processes of childbirth care they and their newborns needed to benefit from their choice to deliver in a health facility. In particular, few benefited from even basic risk assessments, leading to missed opportunities to identify risks. To continue with the recommendation of childbirth care in primary healthcare facilities in high mortality settings like Gombe, it is crucial that birth attendant capacity, capability and prioritisation processes are addressed.
Collapse