1
|
Kapilashrami A, John EA, Aziz R, Chan K, Wickramage K. Bridging the gap: Using CHNRI to align migration health research priorities in India with local expertise and global perspectives. J Glob Health 2023; 13:04148. [PMID: 37934961 PMCID: PMC10630695 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.04148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Migration and health are increasingly recognised as a global public health priority, but concerns have been raised on the skewed nature of current research and the potential disconnect between health needs and policy and governance responses. The Migration Health South Asia (MiHSA) network led the first systematic research priority-setting exercise for India, aligned with the global call to develop a clearly defined migration health research agenda that will inform research investments and guide migrant-responsive policies by the year 2030. Methods We adapted the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method for this priority setting exercise for migration health. Guided by advisory groups established at international and country levels, we sought research topics from 51 experts from diverse disciplines and sectors across India. We consolidated 223 responses into 59 research topics across five themes and scored them against five predefined criteria: answerability, effectiveness, feasibility, impact, and effect on equity. We then calculated research priority scores (RPS) and average expert agreement (AEA) each research topic and theme. Results A third of the 59 research topics were on migrants' health and health care access, 12 on social determinants of migrants' health, 10 on policies, law and migration health governance, eight on health systems' responsiveness, and five on migration health discourse. Three of the top five priority topics pertained to migrants' health care access. The policies, law, and governance theme had the highest overall RPS score. Conclusions There is a noticeable gap between research priorities identified by experts at the country-level and the current research focus and priorities set globally. This disconnect between the global and local perspectives in migration health scholarship hinders the development of context-specific and suitable policy agendas for improving migrants' health. Our co-developed agenda emphasises the need to prioritise research on the capacity of existing systems and policies so as to make them more migration-aware and responsive to migrants' health needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Kapilashrami
- School of Health & Social Care, University of Essex, UK
- Migration Health South Asia Network (MiHSA)
| | | | - Roomi Aziz
- Migration Health South Asia Network (MiHSA)
| | - Kit Chan
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kolitha Wickramage
- Migration Health South Asia Network (MiHSA)
- Migration Health Division, The United Nations Migration Agency (IOM), Switzerland
| | | | | | - India Experts Group for MiHSA Priority Setting Initiative
- School of Health & Social Care, University of Essex, UK
- Migration Health South Asia Network (MiHSA)
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Migration Health Division, The United Nations Migration Agency (IOM), Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agravat P, Loucaides EM, Kumar MB, Howells A, García AM, Sebina I, Balanza N, Fitchett EJA, Lawn JE. Research funding for newborn health and stillbirths, 2011-20: a systematic analysis of levels and trends. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e1794-e1804. [PMID: 37858589 PMCID: PMC10603613 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00379-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, an estimated 4·4 million newborn deaths and stillbirths occurred in 2020, and 98% of these deaths occurred in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to analyse new research grants for newborns and stillbirth awarded by major funders in 2019-20, and all research funding allocated to LMIC-based institutions in 2011-20. METHODS For this systematic analysis, we searched Dimensions, the world's largest research funding database, for grants relevant to neonatal and stillbirth research. Included grants were categorised by in-depth content analysis, with descriptive quantitative analyses by funder and recipient countries, research pipeline, topic, and year. FINDINGS Globally, in 2019-20, major funders awarded a mean annual total of US$577·1 million per year for newborn and stillbirth research (mean total of 550 grants per year). $166·3 million (28·8%) of $577·1 million was directed to small and vulnerable newborn research, but only $8·4 million (1·5%) was directed to stillbirth research. The majority of funding, $537·0 million (93·0%), was allocated to organisations based in high-income countries. Between 2011 and 2020, LMIC-based recipients were named on 1985 grants from all funders worth $486·7 million, of which $73·1 million (15·0%) was allocated to small and vulnerable newborn research and $12·0 million (2·5%) was allocated to stillbirth research. Most LMIC funding supported preclinical or observational studies ($236·8 million [48·7%] of $486·7 million), with implementation research receiving only $13·9 million (2·9%). INTERPRETATION Although investment in research related to neonatal health and stillbirths has increased between 2011 and 2020, there are marked disparities in distribution geographically, between major causes of mortality, and among research pipeline types. Stillbirth research received minimal funding in both high-income countries and LMICs, despite a similar number of deaths compared with neonates. Direct investment in LMIC-led research, especially for implementation research, could accelerate the slow global progress on stillbirth prevention and newborn survival. FUNDING None. TRANSLATIONS For the French, German and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meghan Bruce Kumar
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; KEMRI-Wellcome Trust, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Anna Howells
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ismail Sebina
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Núria Balanza
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Joy E Lawn
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salam SS, Ameen S, Balen J, Nahar Q, Jabeen S, Ahmed A, Gillespie B, Chauke L, Mannan A, Hoque M, Dey SK, Islam J, Ashrafee S, Alam HMS, Saberin A, Saha PK, Sarkar S, Alim A, Islam MS, Gray C, El Arifeen S, Rahman AE, Anumba DOC. Research prioritisation on prevention and management of preterm birth in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) with a special focus on Bangladesh using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method. J Glob Health 2023; 13:07004. [PMID: 37651640 PMCID: PMC10472017 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.07004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fifteen million babies are born preterm globally each year, with 81% occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Preterm birth complications are the leading cause of newborn deaths and significantly impact health, quality of life, and costs of health services. Improving outcomes for newborns and their families requires prioritising research for developing practical, scalable solutions, especially in low-resource settings such as Bangladesh. We aimed to identify research priorities related to preventing and managing preterm birth in LMICs for 2021-2030, with a special focus on Bangladesh. Methods We adopted the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method to set research priorities for preventing and managing preterm birth. Seventy-six experts submitted 490 research questions online, which we collated into 95 unique questions and sent for scoring to all experts. A hundred and nine experts scored the questions using five pre-selected criteria: answerability, effectiveness, deliverability, maximum potential for burden reduction, and effect on equity. We calculated weighted and unweighted research priority scores and average expert agreement to generate a list of top-ranked research questions for LMICs and Bangladesh. Results Health systems and policy research dominated the top 20 identified priorities for LMICs, such as understanding and improving uptake of the facility and community-based Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC), promoting breastfeeding, improving referral and transport networks, evaluating the impact of the use of skilled attendants, quality improvement activities, and exploring barriers to antenatal steroid use. Several of the top 20 questions also focused on screening high-risk women or the general population of women, understanding the causes of preterm birth, or managing preterm babies with illnesses (jaundice, sepsis and retinopathy of prematurity). There was a high overlap between research priorities in LMICs and Bangladesh. Conclusions This exercise, aimed at identifying priorities for preterm birth prevention and management research in LMICs, especially in Bangladesh, found research on improving the care of preterm babies to be more important in reducing the burden of preterm birth and accelerating the attainment of Sustainable Development Goal 3 target of newborn deaths, by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shafiqul Ameen
- The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Julie Balen
- The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| | - Quamrun Nahar
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Sabrina Jabeen
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Anisuddin Ahmed
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Abdul Mannan
- Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Sanjoy Kumer Dey
- Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jahurul Islam
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Sabina Ashrafee
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Husam Md Shah Alam
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Ashfia Saberin
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Palash Kumar Saha
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Supriya Sarkar
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Azizul Alim
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Muhammad Shariful Islam
- Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
| | - Clive Gray
- Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Shams El Arifeen
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shifting research priorities in maternal and child health in the COVID-19 pandemic era in India: A renewed focus on systems strengthening. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256099. [PMID: 34383861 PMCID: PMC8360530 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The remarkable progress seen in maternal and child health (MCH) in India over the past two decades has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to undertake a rapid assessment to identify key priorities for public health research in MCH in India within the context and aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A web-based survey was developed to identify top research priorities in MCH. It consisted of 26 questions on six broad domains: vaccine preventable diseases, outbreak preparedness, primary healthcare integration, maternal health, neonatal health, and infectious diseases. Key stakeholders were invited to participate between September and November 2020. Participants assigned importance on a 5-point Likert scale, and assigned overall ranks to each sub-domain research priority. Descriptive statistics were used to examine Likert scale responses, and a ranking analysis was done to obtain an “average ranking score” and identify the top research priority under each domain. Results Amongst the 84 respondents from across 15 Indian states, 37% were public-health researchers, 25% healthcare providers, 20% academic faculty and 13% were policy makers. Most respondents considered conducting systems strengthening research as extremely important. The highest ranked research priorities were strengthening the public sector workforce (vaccine preventable diseases), enhancing public-health surveillance networks (outbreak preparedness), nutrition support through community workers (primary care integration), encouraging at least 4–8 antenatal visits (maternal health), neonatal resuscitation to reduce birth asphyxia (neonatal health) and screening and treatment of tuberculosis (infectious diseases). Common themes identified through open-ended questions primarily included systems strengthening priorities across domains. Conclusions The overall focus for research priorities in MCH in India during the COVID-19 pandemic is on strengthening existing services and service delivery, rather than novel research. Our results highlight pivotal steps within the roadmap for advancing and sustaining maternal and child health gains during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Collapse
|