1
|
Stanić Ž, Hrgović Z, Fureš R, Vusić I, Lagančić M. Ethical Aspects of Prenatal DNA Testing. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022; 226:300-303. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-8406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
AbstractCell-free DNA (cfDNA) first-trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies, as a
non-invasive, safe, and rather accurate method, has changed prenatal screening
policies all over the world. Owing to aggressive marketing, cfDNA screening
tests exhibit global popularity and a rapid spread in routine prenatal care.
However, wide availability of the tests, together with observed difficulties in
the test’s interpretation, bring to light several serious ethical
concerns. To date it is vital to identify and address the most important
ethical, legal, and social issues regarding prenatal screening tests.
Furthermore, guidelines and restrictions in certain cfDNA screening advancements
that may provide information regarding fetal genetic traits of unknown clinical
significance, conditions with variable penetrance, or late-onset conditions,
should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Žana Stanić
- Department for Integrative Gynecology, Obstetrics and Minimally
Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Zabok General Hospital and Croatian Veterans
Hospital, Zabok, Croatia
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer
University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Zlatko Hrgović
- Women's Health Clinic, J. W. Goethe University
Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Rajko Fureš
- Department for Integrative Gynecology, Obstetrics and Minimally
Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Zabok General Hospital and Croatian Veterans
Hospital, Zabok, Croatia
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer
University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
| | - Iva Vusić
- Health Center of Bjelovar-Bilogora County, Bjelovar,
Croatia
| | - Marko Lagančić
- Emergency Department, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb,
Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schöne-Seifert B, Junker C. Making use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): rethinking issues of routinization and pressure. J Perinat Med 2021; 49:959-964. [PMID: 34469636 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
First mapping the main ethical issues surrounding prenatal testing, we then analyze which concerns are specific to non-invasive methods. Presupposing the privatization premise for reproductive autonomy in fundamentally liberal societies, we go on to specify common concerns about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) covered by the term 'routinization', and conceptually unravel the frequently expressed worry of increasing 'pressure' to test and/or terminate affected pregnancies. We argue that mindful decision-making should be a key educational goal (not only) of NIPT counseling which could be achieved through stepwise disclosure. In addition, we identify indirect social pressure as the most plausible threat to reproductive freedom. While continuous efforts need to be made to prevent such pressure - not least by ensuring balanced availability of options -, restricting testing options, and thus freedom of choice, cannot be the answer to this concern. Lastly, we suggest abandoning the vague term 'routinization' and instead focusing on specified concerns to enable a fruitful debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Schöne-Seifert
- Institute for Medical Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Chiara Junker
- Institute for Medical Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) Associated with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Reflections on the Evolution of Prenatal Diagnosis and Procreative Choices. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12020204. [PMID: 33573312 PMCID: PMC7911180 DOI: 10.3390/genes12020204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
New technologies such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), capable of analyzing cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal bloodstream, have become increasingly widespread and available, which has in turn led to ethical and policy challenges that need addressing. NIPT is not yet a diagnostic tool, but can still provide information about fetal genetic characteristics (including sex) very early in pregnancy, and there is no denying that it offers valuable opportunities for pregnant women, particularly those at high risk of having a child with severe genetic disorders or seeking an alternative to invasive prenatal testing. Nonetheless, the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) include multiple aspects of informed decision-making, which can entail risks for the individual right to procreative autonomy, in addition to the potential threats posed by sex-selective termination of pregnancy (in light of the information about fetal sex within the first trimester), and the stigmatization and discrimination of disabled individuals. After taking such daunting challenges into account and addressing NIPT-related medicolegal complexities, the review's authors highlight the need for an ethically and legally sustainable framework for the implementation of NIPT, which seems poised to become a diagnostic tool, as its scope is likely to broaden in the near future.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravitsky V, Birko S, Le Clerc-Blain J, Haidar H, Affdal AO, Lemoine MÈ, Dupras C, Laberge AM. Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Views of Canadian Pregnant Women and Their Partners Regarding Pressure and Societal Concerns. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:53-62. [DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1829173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stanislav Birko
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jessica Le Clerc-Blain
- Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hazar Haidar
- Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aliya O. Affdal
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Ève Lemoine
- Bioethics, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Charles Dupras
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Schendel RV, Kater-Kuipers A, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, Dondorp WJ, Cornel MC, Henneman L. What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)? J Genet Couns 2016; 26:522-531. [PMID: 27618823 PMCID: PMC5415584 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0012-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the attitudes of parents of children with Down syndrome towards non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and widening the scope of prenatal screening. Three focus groups (n = 16) and eleven individual interviews with Dutch parents (and two relatives) of children with Down syndrome were conducted. Safety, accuracy and earlier testing were seen as the advantages of NIPT. Some participants were critical about the practice of screening for Down syndrome, but acknowledged that NIPT enables people to know whether the fetus is affected and to prepare without risking miscarriage. Many feared uncritical use of NIPT and more abortions for Down syndrome. Concerns included the consequences for the acceptance of and facilities for children with Down syndrome, resulting in more people deciding to screen. Participants stressed the importance of good counseling and balanced, accurate information about Down syndrome. Testing for more disorders might divert the focus away from Down syndrome, but participants worried about “where to draw the line”. They also feared a loss of diversity in society. Findings show that, while parents acknowledge that NIPT offers a better and safer option to know whether the fetus is affected, they also have concerns about NIPT’s impact on the acceptance and care of children with Down syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana Kater-Kuipers
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wybo J Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|