Association between p16, hMLH1 and E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation and intake of local hot salted tea and sun-dried foods in Kashmiris with gastric tumors

Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of stomach cancer in the ethnic population of Mizoram, North East India

Stomach cancer is the fifth most common cancer in terms of prevalence and incidence and the fourth leading cause of mortality in men and women worldwide. It is well-established that aberrant DNA methylation in cells can lead to carcinogenesis. The primary objective of our study was to investigate the aberrant DNA methylation status of genes associated with stomach cancer with a particular reference to the ethnic population of Mizoram, North East India. The site-level analysis identified 2883 CpG sites differentially methylated, representing ~922 genes. Out of which 476 Differentially Methylated Positions (DMPs) were promoter-associated, 452 DMPs were hypermethylated, and 24 were hypomethylated. The region-level analysis identified 462 Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) corresponding to ~320 genes, of which ~281 genes were hypermethylated and ~ 40 genes were hypomethylated. TCGA analysis showed that some of the genes had been previously implicated in other cancers including stomach cancer. Five hypermethylated genes were selected as candidate genes for further investigations and they have shown to be novel and could serve as candidate hypermethylation biomarkers for stomach cancer in this particular ethnic group.

A review on epigenetic effects of environmental factors causing and inhibiting cancer

Epigenetic modifications refer to reversible changes in gene expression. Epigenetic changes include DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs that are collectively called epigenome. Various epigenetic effects account for the main impacts of environment and lifestyle on multifactorial diseases such as cancers. The environment's impacts on cancers act as double-edged swords. While some of them are involved in cancer development, some others contribute to preventing it. In this review article, the keywords 'cancer', 'epigenetic', 'lifestyle', 'carcinogen', ' cancer inhibitors" and related words were searched to finding a link between environmental factors and epigenetic mechanisms influencing cancer in ISI, PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases. Based on the literature environmental factors that are effective in cancer development or cancer prevention in this review will be divided into physical, chemical, biological, and lifestyle types. Different types of epigenetic mechanisms known for each of these agents will be addressed in this review. Unregulated changes in epigenome play roles in tumorigenicity and cancer development. The action mechanism and genes targeted which are related to the signaling pathway for epigenetic alterations determine whether environmental agents are carcinogenic or prevent cancer. Having knowledge about the effective factors and related mechanisms such as epigenetic on cancer can help to prevent and better cancers treatment.

Establishment and characterization of a GES-1 human gastric epithelial cell line stably expressing miR-23a

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are highly conserved, endogenous, small and single-stranded RNA molecules that promote the degradation and translational inhibition of specific target mRNAs in order to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation, and organism growth and development. MiR-23a has been demonstrated to function as an oncogene in certain types of tumor. The aim of the present study was to provide a tool for elucidating the mechanisms of action of miR-23a in gastric cancer, and identify the function of miR-23a in a human gastric epithelium cell line, by establishing a human gastric epithelial GES-1 cell line that stably expressed miR-23a. A plasmid was constructed for the expression of miR-23a by inserting the miR-23a primary sequence into a pcDNA3 vector (pcDNA3/pri-23a). PcDNA3/pri-23a or the empty pcDNA3 vector (EV), which was then transfected into human gastric epithelium GES-1 cells using Lipofectamine to produce GES-1/miR-23a cells and GES-1/EV cells, respectively. G418 (Geneticin) was used to select and expand the G418-resistant colonies, and miR-23a expression was assessed by reverse transcription-semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The proliferation of the cells was assessed using cell counting and MTT assays. The invasive ability of the cells was evaluated using a Transwell assay. The colony-forming ability of the cells was assessed using a colony formation assay. A human gastric epithelium GES-1/miR-23a cell line with the stable expression of miR-23a was successfully established. Compared with the control GES-1 and GES-1/EV cells, the mRNA expression of the miR-23a gene in GES-1/miR-23a cells was significantly increased (P<0.05). The proliferation rate, invasive ability and colony-forming ability of the GES-1/miR-23a cells were significantly higher compared with those of the control GES-1/EV cells and the parental GES-1 cells (P<0.05). Additionally, the results of the present study demonstrated that miR-23a enhanced the cell proliferation rate, invasive ability and cell colony forming ability of GES-1 cells. This data provides a solid experimental foundation for further studies on the function of miRNAs in the development and progression of gastric cancer.

MLH1 Promoter Methylation and Prediction/Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta and Bioinformatic Analysis

Background: The promoter methylation of MLH1 gene and gastric cancer (GC)has been investigated previously. To get a more credible conclusion, we performed a systematic review and meta and bioinformatic analysis to clarify the role of MLH1 methylation in the prediction and prognosis of GC.

Methods: Eligible studies were targeted after searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, BIOSIS, CNKI and Wanfang Data to collect the information of MLH1 methylation and GC. The link strength between the two was estimated by odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quantity assessment. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were employed for bioinformatics analysis on the correlation between MLH1 methylation and GC risk, clinicopathological behavior as well as prognosis.

Results: 2365 GC and 1563 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR of MLH1 methylation in GC was 4.895 (95% CI: 3.149-7.611, P<0.001), which considerably associated with increased GC risk. No significant difference was found in relation to Lauren classification, tumor invasion, lymph node/distant metastasis and tumor stage in GC. Analysis based on GEO and TCGA showed that high MLH1 methylation enhanced GC risk but might not related with GC clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Conclusion:MLH1 methylation is an alive biomarker for the prediction of GC and it might not affect GC behavior. Further study could be conducted to verify the impact of MLH1 methylation on GC prognosis.

Association Between hMLH1 Promoter Methylation and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) is located on chromosome 3q21-23. As a classic tumor suppressor gene, many researchers have studied the association between hMLH1 promoter methylation and gastric cancer, but their conclusions were not always consistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to make a more integrated and precise estimate of the associations.

Method: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved without language restrictions. Data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was used to assess the statistical associations.

Result: A total of 39 studies published before January 20, 2018 were included in this study. The results indicated that the frequency of hMLH1 promoter methylation in gastric cancers was substantially higher than that in non-cancer controls (OR = 7.94, 95%CI = 4.32–14.58, P < 0.001). Furthermore, hMLH1 promoter methylation had considerable associations with lymph node metastasis, microsatellite instability (MSI), and low expression of hMLH1 protein (OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 1.04–2.26, P = 0.03; OR = 15.33, 95%CI = 9.26–25.36, P < 0.001; OR = 37.86, 95%CI = 18.03–79.50, P < 0.001, respectively). No association was found between hMLH1 promoter methylation and Lauren classification or Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection status.

Conclusion: The present study provides evidence that promoter methylation of hMLH1 is a major causative event in the occurrence and development of human gastric cancer.

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells through the demethylation and reactivation of the p16 gene

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of treatment with epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on the human esophageal cancer cell line ECa109 and elucidate the associated underlying mechanisms. ECa109 cells were cultured and treated with increasing concentrations of EGCG for various durations. Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay and apoptosis was detected using flow cytometry. The methylation status of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) gene was analyzed using the methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). p16 mRNA and protein expression was measured using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis, respectively. The results of the present study demonstrated that, following treatment with EGCG, ECa109 cell viability was significantly decreased, while the rate of apoptosis was significantly increased (P<0.01), in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Following treatment of ECa109 cells with EGCG, p16 gene demethylation, and its mRNA and protein expression, were significantly increased compared with the untreated cells (P<0.01). EGCG may induce ECa109 cell apoptosis and inhibit cell growth through p16 gene demethylation, which restores its expression.

Loss of expression and aberrant methylation of the CDH1 (E-cadherin) gene in breast cancer patients from Kashmir

BACKGROUND

Aberrant promoter hypermethylation has been recognized in human breast carcinogenesis as a frequent molecular alteration associated with the loss of expression of a number of key regulatory genes and may serve as a biomarker. The E-cadherin gene (CDH1), mapping at chromosome 16q22, is an intercellular adhesion molecule in epithelial cells, which plays an important role in establishing and maintaining intercellular connections. The aim of our study was to assess the methylation pattern of CDH1 and to correlate it with the expression of E-cadherin, clinicopathological parameters and hormone receptor status in breast cancer patients of Kashmir.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Methylation specific PCR (MSP) was used to determine the methylation status of CDH1 in 128 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) paired with the corresponding normal tissue samples. Immunohistochemistry was used to study the expression of E-cadherin, ER and PR.

RESULTS

CDH1 hypermethylation was detected in 57.8% of cases and 14.8% of normal adjacent controls. Reduced levels of E-cadherin protein were observed in 71.9% of our samples. Loss of E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with the CDH1 promoter region methylation (p<0.05, OR=3.48, CI: 1.55-7.79). Hypermethylation of CDH1 was significantly associated with age at diagnosis (p=0.030), tumor size (p=0.008), tumor grade (p=0.024) and rate of node positivity or metastasis (p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings suggest that abnormal CDH1 methylation occurs in high frequencies in infiltrating breast cancers associated with a decrease in E-cadherin expression. We found significant differences in tumor-related CDH1 gene methylation patterns relevant to tumor grade, tumor size, nodal involvement and age at diagnosis of breast tumors, which could be extended in future to provide diagnostic and prognostic information.

Hypermethylation in gastric cancer

Although gastric cancer (GC) is highly prevalent in China and is a leading cause of cancer-related death, major advances in early diagnostic and effective therapeutic strategies have not been made. GC patients are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage and the prognosis is still poor. Over the years, many efforts have been done on exploring the pathology of GC. In particular, genome-wide analysis tools have been widely used in the detection of genetic and epigenetic alterations in GC. For example, many tumor suppressor genes have been found to be aberrantly hypermethylated in GCs, and some even in gastric precancerous lesions, suggesting a role of this molecular event in early gastric tumorigenesis. In addition, accumulating evidences have demonstrated that some hypermethylated genes can be used as potential biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of GC in biopsy specimens and non-invasive body fluids. These exciting advances provide unprecedented opportunities for the development of molecular-based novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies for GC. Here, we reviewed recent findings on the promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in GC and aimed to provide better understanding of the contribution of this epigenetic event to gastric tumorigenesis.

Role of hMLH1 and E-cadherin promoter methylation in gastric cancer progression

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in Iran. Genome stability is one of the main genetic issues in cancer biology which is governed via the different repair systems such as DNA mismatch repair (MMR). A clear correlation between MMR defects and tumor progression has been shown. Beside the genetic mutations, epigenetic changes also have a noticeable role in MMR defects.

METHODS

Here, we assessed promoter methylation status and the level of hMLH1mRNA expression as the main component of MMR system in 51 GC patients using the methylation-specific PCR and real-time PCR, respectively. Moreover, we performed a promoter methylation study of the E-cadherin gene promoter.

RESULTS

It was observed that, 12 out of 39 cases (23.5%) had hMLH1 overexpression. Hypermethylation of hMLH1 and E-cadherin promoter regions were observed in 25.5 and 36.4%, respectively. Although, there was no significant correlation between hMLH1 mRNA expression and clinicopathological features, there are significant correlations between E-cadherin promoter methylation and tumor stage (p = 0.028) and location (p = 0.025). The rate of hMLH1 promoter methylation in this study was lower than that in the other population, showing the importance of the other mechanisms, in gastric tumorigenesis.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that DNA repair system is adversely affected by hypermethylation of hMLH1 in a fraction of gastric cancer patients. Additionally, E-cadherin hypermethylation seen in a subset of our gastric cancer patients is consistent with other reports showing correlation with aggressiveness and metastasis of gastric cancer.

Detection of aberrant promoter methylation of RNF180, DAPK1 and SFRP2 in plasma DNA of patients with gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in East Asia, particularly in China, and remains the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. However, no effective plasma biomarkers have been identified for the diagnosis of patients with GC. The aim of this study was to investigate the DNA methylation status of the ring finger protein 180 (RNF180), secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2) and death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) genes in the plasma samples of 57 GC patients and 42 control individuals with no malignant disease, and to evaluate the clinical utility of these makers. A significantly higher level of methylation was observed in the plasma DNA of GC patients when compared with that of controls for the three genes investigated (RNF180, 57.89% vs. 23.81%; DAPK1, 49.12% vs. 28.57%; and SFRP2, 71.93% vs. 42.86%). No association was identified between the DAPK1 or SFRP2 methylation level in the plasma DNA and the clinicopathological parameters of patients. Notably, RNF180 methylation was found to positively correlate with tumor size (P=0.018), histological type (P=0.025), TNM stage (P=0.002), lymph node metastasis (P=0.008) and distant metastasis (P=0.018). Overall, 50 cancer patients (87.72%) exhibited methylation of at least one of the three markers, while 26 normal subjects presented methylation in plasma DNA [specificity, 38.1%; odds ratio (OR), 4.4]. The combined use of RNF180 and SFRP2 as methylation markers appeared to be the most preferable predictor with regard to predictive power and cost-performance (OR, 5.57; P=0.0002). The results of the present study indicate that aberrant promoter methylation of genes in the plasma may be detected in a substantial proportion of GC patients and thus, these genes must be evaluated in the screening and surveillance of GC.

Gastrokine 1 expression in the human gastric mucosa is closely associated with the degree of gastritis and DNA methylation

Purpose

Gastrokine 1 plays an important role in gastric mucosal defense. Additionally, the Gastrokine 1-miR-185-DNMT1 axis has been shown to suppress gastric carcinogenesis through regulation of epigenetic alteration. Here, we investigated the effects of Gastrokine 1 on DNA methylation and gastritis.

Materials and Methods

Expression of Gastrokine 1, DNMT1, EZH2, and c-Myc proteins, and the presence of Helicobacter pylori CagA protein were determined in 55 non-neoplastic gastric mucosal tissue samples by western blot analysis. The CpG island methylation phenotype was also examined using six markers (p16, hMLH1, CDH1, MINT1, MINT2 and MINT31) by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Histological gastritis was assessed according to the updated Sydney classification system.

Results

Reduced Gastrokine 1 expression was found in 20 of the 55 (36.4%) gastric mucosal tissue samples and was closely associated with miR-185 expression. The Gastrokine 1 expression level was inversely correlated with that of DNMT1, EZH2, and c-Myc, and closely associated with the degree of gastritis. The H. pylori CagA protein was detected in 26 of the 55 (47.3%) gastric mucosal tissues and was positively associated with the expression of DNMT1, EZH2, and c-Myc. In addition, 30 (54.5%) and 23 (41.9%) of the gastric mucosal tissues could be classified as CpG island methylation phenotype-low and CpG island methylation phenotype-high, respectively. Reduced expression of Gastrokine 1 and miR-185, and increased expression of DNMT1, EZH2, and c-Myc were detected in the CpG island methylation phenotype-high gastric mucosa.

Conclusions

Gastrokine 1 has a crucial role in gastric inflammation and DNA methylation in gastric mucosa.

Relationship between hMLH1 methylation, microsatellite instability and gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, and its development is a very complicated process. Although great progress has been made in the understanding of gastric cancer, its exact mechanism is still unclear. The human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1), a main member of the mismatch repair system, participates in mismatch repair during DNA replication, and plays an important role in maintaining genome stability. The reduction or loss of hMLH1 expression, which often shows as microsatellite instability (MSI), is closely related to the development, treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer, and the main reason is hMLH1 promoter methylation. In this paper, we will review the recent progress in understanding the relationship between hMLH1 methylation, MSI and development, treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Aberrant expression of E-cadherin in lung tissues of patients with probable lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the relationship of E-cadherin mRNA and protein expression with the diagnosis of lung cancer with the aim of providing an auxiliary diagnostic method.

METHODS

Semi-quantitative nested RT-PCR and western blotting were applied to detect E-cadherin mRNA transcripts and protein, respectively, in 30 cases of diagnostic lung cancer, 30 cases of clinically suspected patients with lung cancer and 30 cases of other disease. Immunohistochemical staining was also used to detect E-cadherin.

RESULTS

Remarkably decreased levels of relative E-cadherin mRNA value and increased E-cadherin protein negativity were observed in probable lung cancer, when compared with possible lung cancer and others. With a threshold of 1.45, relative E-cadherin mRNA value showed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 83% for the diagnosis of lung cancer. The combination of decreased relative E-cadherin mRNA value and negative E-cadherin protein increased the specificity and sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that Chinese patients with diagnostic lung cancer have similar decreased levels of relative E-cadherin mRNA and E-cadherin protein value in the lung cancer tissues as in lung cancer patients in other countries. Measurement of relative E-cadherin mRNA and protein values in lung cancer tissues has potential for lung cancer diagnosis.