Optimal Preservations of Cytological Materials Using Liquid-Based Cytology Fixatives for Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Molecular targeted therapies have been established for various diseases, including cancers, and there is an increasing need for molecular testing on cytology specimens. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal preservation methods of liquid-based cytology (LBC) materials for molecular testing.

METHODS

Cytological samples from 35 surgical resected non-small cell lung carcinoma specimens were obtained between June 2016 and June 2021. The samples were fixed in CytoRich™ red Preservative and stored at 4°C. One week later, three tubes were prepared from each specimen sample and divided into the following groups: the SurePath™ group (continued storage at 4°C), Frozen (Fr) group (stored at -80°C after centrifugation), and LBC-Cell Block (LBC-CB) group (generation of paraffin-embedded CB and storage at 4°C). Samples from 5 patients were used for the time course analysis, and we performed evaluations on these samples at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The concentrations and purities of extracted DNA and RNA were measured. The double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and RNA concentrations were also measured by a fluorometer. The DNA and RNA integrities were quantified by the DNA and RNA integrity number.

RESULTS

Evaluation of samples was performed at baseline and the six timepoints. In the LBC-CB group, DNA and dsDNA concentrations were higher rather than those in the other groups. The RNA concentration of the LBC-CB group was relatively high compared with those of the other groups at the 36-month timepoint. The Fr group maintained higher DNA quality compared with the other groups over 3 years. The LBC-CB group maintained a higher RNA quality than the other groups until 24 months.

CONCLUSION

LBC-CB preparation is an effective method to maintain DNA/RNA quality and quantity in long-duration preservation for eventual molecular testing. Therefore, LBC-CB may have applications on preanalytical stage for molecular genomic testing such as next-generation sequencing.

Concordance of Cytological Specimens with Histological Tissue for Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing need for more testing in non-small cell lung cancer given the introduction of newer targeted therapies. Cytological specimens including conventional smears (CS), cell blocks (CB), and liquid-based cytology (LBC) are an alternative to histologic tissue (HT) specimens in detecting EGFR mutations, but the concordance of these 2 specimens is yet to be determined. The aim of the present systematic review is to determine the concordance rates between different cytologic specimens with HT in detecting EGFR mutations.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were utilized in the primary search, along with reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text articles. Concordance rates were pooled together if 2 or more studies reporting the same type of cytologic specimen were available.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies were included in this review, with 13 studies included in the pooled analysis. There was an overall concordance rate of 92.8% in 593 paired cytologic and HT specimens, with LBC having the highest concordance rate of 96.0%, followed by CS and CB, each with a concordance rate of 95.8%, although the concordance rate of CS and/or CB was lower at 90.6% with a larger pool of studies. LBC was found to have a significantly higher concordance rate than CS and/or CB.

CONCLUSION

Cytological specimens have a high concordance rate in detecting EGFR mutations, when compared to HT. LBC has shown superior concordance rates compared to CS and CB. Cytological specimens should be considered as an additional and alternative source of diagnostic material for EGFR testing.

Evaluation of liquid based cytology in detection of EGFR mutation in NSCLC by large samples

Background

Cytology samples are the main resources to detect driver oncogene alterations for advanced lung cancer patients. To explore the value of liquid-based cytology in the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we analyzed data from a large cohort of EGFR mutation-positive patients.

Methods

We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of 8,029 NSCLC cases tested for EGFR mutation by liquid-based cytology specimens and 1,934 NSCLC cases tested by formalin-fixed and paraffine-embedded (FFPE) samples in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from September 2015 to December 2019. Before detection, we evaluated the number of tumor cells in the liquid-based cytology slide, and samples with more than 50 tumor cells and visible sediment were selected for DNA extraction after centrifugation.

Results

The positive rate of EGFR mutation in liquid-based cytology-tested cases was 47.18%, higher than the 41.37% tested through FFPE sample (P<0.01). Accordingly, the mutation rate of EGFR in adenocarcinoma (AC) and NSCLC was higher than that of the FFPE sample (60.01% vs. 54.15%, P<0.01; 30.54% vs. 21.99%, P<0.01). The positive rate of EGFR mutation in pleural effusion was 62.67%, which was the highest rate among liquid-based cytology sample t (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Using quality control and standard procedure, it was found that liquid-based cytology specimen testing is a convenient and reliable method of EGFR detection, as validated by analysis of a large cohort. EGFR mutation detection should also be carried out in NSCLC patients diagnosed by cytology more than in AC patients.

Method for preservation of DNA stability of liquid-based cytology specimens from a lung adenocarcinoma cell line

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens of lung adenocarcinoma have the potential to be widely used for genetic analysis. However, formaldehyde contained in some LBC preservation solutions can cause DNA fragmentation during specimen storage, rendering the samples unsuitable for molecular analysis. To investigate a novel preservation technique for improved DNA stability, which was evaluated by mutation analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cells were fixed in CytoRich Red preservation solution. After 30 min of fixation, cells were either stored using the conventional method (suspended in preservation solution) or washed in phosphate-buffered saline and stored as a cell pellet (newly proposed method). The effect of storage was evaluated after 5, 7, and 9 days of storage at ambient temperature. The cell pellet group was also tested after 14 and 28 days. Specifically, we evaluated the DNA stability, DNA yield, and sample suitability for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and EGFR mutation detection. The DNA yields and degree of stability from the cell pellet group were higher than those from the suspension group at every time point examined. PCR amplification from the cell pellet group was successful up to day 28. Mutation detection using the Cycleave PCR method indicated that the Ct values of the cell pellet group were significantly lower than those of the suspension group. Storing LBC specimens as a cell pellet post-fixation can maintain the DNA quality for a longer period than the conventional method, making it a promising strategy for molecular analysis.

Bronchial brushing cytology is comparable to bronchial biopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation test in non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives:

Bronchial brushing (BB) is often used to obtain supplementary samples for diagnosing lung cancer. We examined the possibility of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing on BB samples and compared them with bronchial biopsy samples.

Material and Methods:

We used 150 BB samples with non-small cell carcinoma submitted to our department within 2 years. Biopsy samples were concurrently submitted for histologic diagnosis. We used the peptide nucleic acid clamping method for EFGR mutation test. Histologic diagnosis identified 137 cases of adenocarcinomas and 13 cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma, not otherwise specified. Each sample was assessed for adequacy and DNA content for EGFR mutation test.

Results:

Among BB samples, 28 had exon 19 deletion, 21 had mutations in exon 21, 99 were wild type, and analysis of two failed. The EGFR mutation rate in BB samples was 33.1% (49/148). Among bronchial biopsy samples, 26 had exon 19 deletion, 20 had mutations in exon 21, 92 were wild type, and analysis of 12 failed. The EGFR mutation rate using biopsy sample was 33.8% (46/136). The mutation detection results were nearly identical in both groups of samples (131/138, 94.9%). However, in two cases, an exon 21 mZutation was detected in biopsy samples but not in BB samples. In five cases, exon 19 deletion (two cases) and exon 21 mutation (three cases) were detected in BB but not in biopsy samples. The median DNA content was 58.83 ng for BB samples and 48.47 ng for biopsy samples. The failure rate for BB samples was lower than for biopsy samples. Overall, the BB samples were comparable to bronchial biopsy samples in terms of DNA quantity and mutation detection results.

Conclusion:

We conclude that in case of inadequate biopsy samples, BB samples can be used as a substitute material for EGFR mutation test.

Subtyping and EGFR mutation testing from blocks of cytological materials, based on liquid-based cytology for lung cancer at bronchoscopic examinations

BACKGROUND

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) allows immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular testing to be performed in fixed cell materials. We examined the feasibility of subtyping and EGFR mutation testing of bronchoscopic samples from patients with lung cancer using cell blocks (CB) based on LBC fixation (LBC-CB).

METHODS

We included 35 consecutive patients with peripheral lung nodules who underwent endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in our hospital. Thirty of these patients were diagnosed with lung cancer by obtaining cytological samples. Cytological subtyping was performed with IHC using LBC-CB, and the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test ver. 2 was performed using extracted genomic DNA from the LBC-CB, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and matched plasma.

RESULTS

Of the 30 cases, 25 were classified cytomorphologically as adenocarcinoma (ADC, n = 17) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SQCC, n = 8). The remaining five cases were classified by IHC as favor ADC (n = 3) and favor SQCC (n = 2) according to the WHO criteria. In the final ADC group (n = 20), EGFR mutations on the LBC-CB were identified in eight cases (40%; 1 exon 19 deletion, 6 L858R, and 1 L861Q). Mutations in FFPE samples were identified in seven cases (35%) at the same site in each case. Plasma EGFR mutations were identified in four cases (20%) at the same site. The CB detection rate was higher than for FFPE and plasma.

CONCLUSION

LBC-CB is suitable for subtyping and EGFR mutation testing in lung cancers.

Molecular Analysis of Liquid-Based Cytological Specimen Using Virtually Positive Sputum with Adenocarcinoma Cells

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) analysis of sputum is a useful diagnostic and prognostic tool for detecting lung cancer. DNA and RNA derived from lung cancer cells can be used for this diagnosis. However, the quality of cytological material is not always adequate for molecular analysis due to the effect of formalin in the commercially available fixation kits. In this study, we examined DNA and RNA extraction methods for LBC analysis with formalin fixation, using lung carcinoma cell lines and sputum. The human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines were fixed with LBC fixation reagents, such as CytoRich red preservative. Quantification of thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and actin mRNA, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) DNA in HCC827, H1975, and H1299 cells, and mutation analysis of EGFR in HCC827 and H1975 cells were performed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based preferential homoduplex formation assay (F-PHFA) method, respectively. mRNA and DNA extracted from cell lines using RNA and/or DNA extraction kits for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) fixed with various LBC solutions were efficiently detected by qPCR. The detection limit of EGFR mutations was at a rate of 5% mutated positive cells in LBC. The detection limit of the EGFR exon 19 deletion in HCC827 was detected in more than 1.5% of the positive cells in sputum. In contrast, the detection limit of the T790M/L858R mutation in H1975 was detected in more than 13% of the positive cells. We also detected EGFR mutations using next generation sequencing (NGS). The detection limit of NGS for EGFR mutation was lower than that of the F-PHFA method. Furthermore, more than 0.1% of positive cells could be cytomorphologically detected. Our results demonstrate that LBC systems are powerful tools for cytopathological and genetic analyses. However, careful attention should be paid to the incidence of false negative results in the genetic analysis of EGFR mutations detected by LBC.

Comparison of the SuperARMS and ARMS for detecting EGFR mutations in liquid-based cytology specimens from NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

Non-surgical cytological specimens are adequate not only for accurate histological subtyping but also for molecular profiling. A modified amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS PCR), known as SuperARMS PCR, was improved by optimizing the primers designation, which provides a higher sensitivity and specificity approach for free plasma DNA detection. It is unclear whether SuperARMS PCR detects epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cytology samples. The aim of this study was to compare the EGFR mutations detected by ARMS PCR and SuperARMS PCR in cytology samples derived from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

From March 2016 to March 2018, a total of 234 cytological samples were obtained from primary or metastatic lesions of NSCLC, including 144 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs), 36 endobroncheal ultrasonography (EBUS) FNAs, 36 transbronchial needle aspirations (TBNAs) and 18 pleural effusion (PLEs). EGFR mutations were simultaneously detected using an ADx-ARMS EGFR kit (Amoy Diagnostics CO., ltd., Xiamen, China) and an ADx-SuperARMS EGFR kit (Amoy Diagnostics CO., ltd., Xiamen, China). Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were further used to verify the EGFR mutant inconsistent samples.

RESULTS

All of the 234 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC were diagnosed and assessed by two cytopathologists, and their EGFR mutation statuses were successfully detected by ARMS and SuperARMS. Importantly, the SuperARMS and ARMS methods showed a highly concordant result of 94.0% (220/234) (95%CI: 85.0, 95.0%). The positive rate of the SuperARMS was higher than the ARMS in the cytology samples for EGFR detection (46.2% vs. 40.2%). The specific EGFR mutation sites in 16 samples (6.8%) were not completely consistent between the SuperARMS and ARMS. A total of 14 patients showed EGFR mutations when detected by SuperARMS, but by ARMS there were EGFR wild-type. Two patients were detected as having one more EGFR mutation site by SuperARMS than by ARMS. ddPCR and NGS were used to further confirm the EGFR mutations in these inconsistent samples. Eight samples had the same mutation results as the SuperARMS, and 6 samples were not verified because the remaining DNA was insufficient. A total of 78 EGFR mutation patients received Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) treatment. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% (69/78) for EGFR TKI treatment.

CONCLUSION

SuperARMS showed a high sensitivity and specificity for EGFR detection and thus, is expected to become a routine test in the clinic to be used as a widely available, easy-to-operate and sensitive method for EGFR mutation detection in liquid-based cytology samples.

To Obtain More With Less: Cytologic Samples With Ancillary Molecular Techniques-The Useful Role of Liquid-Based Cytology

CONTEXT

- Fine-needle aspiration cytology has been increasingly used as the first tool in the evaluation of several diseases. Although cytology has a relevant role in the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions, conventional slides cannot lead to 100% conclusive results. It was hoped that the introduction of liquid-based cytology (LBC) would improve the efficacy of cytology through standardization, quality improvement, and the possibility of carrying out ancillary techniques on the residual stored material. In recent decades, the application of genomic alterations has been studied on cytologic samples with feasible and reliable results. The molecular analysis offers a powerful aid to define the best clinical or surgical approaches and follow-up for patients. In recent years, the application of different ancillary techniques has been carried out on conventional slides even though LBC represents a useful additional and alternative method for molecular testing.

OBJECTIVE

- To demonstrate the relevance of LBC as a valid aid to overcoming the difficulties encountered in the application of ancillary techniques on conventional slides.

DATA SOURCES

- We examined and reviewed our experience with the application of ancillary techniques on LBC performed on different body sites.

CONCLUSIONS

- We emphasize that LBC achieves significant and accurate results. It represents a valid method for cytologic evaluation and it provides highly reproducible and informative molecular yields.

Detection of EGFR and KRAS gene mutations using suspension liquid-based cytology specimens in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

Background

The detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma using liquid-based cytology suspension routine specimens from fine-needle aspiration remains controversial.

Results

The DNA of all specimens was extracted and real time PCR was performed successfully. The rate of EGFR and KARS mutations was 37.7% (58/154) and 5.8% (9/154), respectively. EGFR mutation rate was significantly higher in females than that in males (47.8% vs. 29.4%, P = 0.019). There were no significant differences among different age groups or different tumor sites. These results of EGFR and KRAS mutations using LBC specimens were consistant with the tissue samples. In 30 patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, complete response, partial response, stable disease and progress disease was observed in 2, 10, 13 and 5 patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Liquid-based cytology specimen is reliable and can be an alternative source for the detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations.

Methods

154 fine-needle aspiration cytologic samples were obtained from patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The specimens included 21 cases of mediastinal lymph node 123 cases of neck nodules and 10 cases of subcutaneous nodules. After the diagnosis and count of tumor cells performed by cytopathologists, liquid-based cytology specimens with sufficient tumor cells were used for EGFR and KRAS testing using real-time PCR.

Preanalytic specimen triage: Smears, cell blocks, cytospin preparations, transport media, and cytobanking

With increasing requests for the evaluation of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers, great attention must be paid to the preanalytical issues regarding sample quality and DNA/RNA yield from all different types of cytological preparations. The objectives of this review were: 1) to provide an update regarding the importance of specimen triage as well as specimen handling and collection; 2) to discuss the different cell preparations that can be used for molecular testing, their advantages and limitations; and 3) to highlight the strategies for biobanking cytology samples. Good-quality DNA/RNA can be harvested from fresh cells in cell suspensions, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks, archival stained smears, archival unstained cytospin preparations, liquid-based cytology slides, FTA cards, and cryopreserved cells. In contrast to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens (small biopsies and surgical resections), the multitude of types of sample preparations as well as the diversity in sample collection and processing procedures make cytology an ideal specimen for most genomic platforms, with less DNA and RNA degradation and a purer sample, usually with a higher concentration of tumor cells. The broad incorporation of cytological specimens into clinical practice. A should increase the number of samples potentially available for molecular tests and avoid repeat invasive procedures for tissue procurement, thereby increasing patient safety. In this context, it is of utmost importance that cytopathologists become familiar with the variables that can affect test results and embrace the goal of excellence in sample quality. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125(6 suppl):455-64. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Biomarker Testing in Lung Carcinoma Cytology Specimens: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society

The advent of targeted therapy in lung cancer has heralded a paradigm shift in the practice of cytopathology with the need for accurately subtyping lung carcinoma, as well as providing adequate material for molecular studies, to help guide clinical and therapeutic decisions. The variety and versatility of cytologic-specimen preparations offer significant advantages to molecular testing; however, they frequently remain underused. Therefore, evaluating the utility and adequacy of cytologic specimens is critical, not only from a lung cancer diagnosis standpoint but also for the myriad ancillary studies that are necessary to provide appropriate clinical management. A large fraction of lung cancers are diagnosed by aspiration or exfoliative cytology specimens, and thus, optimizing strategies to triage and best use the tissue for diagnosis and biomarker studies forms a critical component of lung cancer management. This review focuses on the opportunities and challenges of using cytologic specimens for molecular diagnosis of lung cancer and the role of cytopathology in the molecular era.

Factors that predict progression-free survival in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Although first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have shown efficacy in patients with advanced lung cancers, survival predictors with these drugs have not been extensively investigated. This study was performed to explore factors that may predict progression-free survival (PFS) in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data on 208 patients who received either gefitinib, erlotinib or icotinib, including the patients' EGFR mutation status and levels of six serum tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA21-1) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)]. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with PFS.

RESULTS

At the study cutoff date, 189 (90.9%) of the patients met the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 criteria for progressive disease (PD), while 19 (9.1%) had stable disease (SD). The median PFS of the 208 patients was 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.0-13.8 months). In the multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model, a non-smoking history [hazard ratio (HR) =2.460; 95% CI, 1.484-4.079; P<0.001], first-line treatment (HR =1.500; 95% CI, 1.062-2.119; P=0.021), and a high pretreatment serum level of CEA (HR =1.424; 95% CI 1.026-1.977; P=0.035) were found to be significant predictors of a longer PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, a non-smoking history, first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment and a high serum level of CEA were independent predictors of a longer PFS along with an EGFR-activating mutation.

Preanalytic parameters in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing for non-small cell lung carcinoma: A review of cytologic series

The results from molecular assays can be affected significantly by the preanalytic condition of cytologic samples. The authors review current knowledge on the use of cytologic samples for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in non–small cell lung cancer with a focus on preanalytic parameters. A systematic electronic search of the MEDLINE database was performed to identify original articles that reported the use of cytologic samples for EGFR molecular analysis and included a minimum of 100 samples. The information collected included author(s), journal, and year of publication; number of patients and samples; sampling method; type of preparation; type of fixative; staining techniques; mutation analysis techniques; tumor cellularity; the percentage of tumor cells; data on DNA quantity, quality, and concentration; failed assays; and the mutation rate. EGFR mutation analysis was conducted on 4999 cytologic samples from 22 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Fine‐needle aspirates and pleural effusions were the most common types of specimens used. DNA was mainly extracted from cell blocks and smears, and the most commonly reported fixatives included formalin, ethanol, and CytoLyt. Cellularity assessments and DNA yields were available from 5 studies each. The average success rate for the assays that used cytologic specimens was 95.87% (range, 85.2%‐100%). The mutation rate ranged from 6% to 50.46%, and a higher mutation detection rate and lower numbers of insufficient cases were reported for pleural effusions and lymph node samples from endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with histologic specimens. Low cellularity and a low percentage of tumor cells were associated with higher test failure rates. Future guidelines should consider the current data for specific recommendations regarding cytologic samples. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:633–643. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Preanalytic parameters for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing are reviewed in non–small cell lung cancer using 4999 cytologic samples from 22 studies. A higher mutation detection rate and lower numbers of insufficient cases are observed for pleural effusions and lymph node samples obtained using endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with histologic specimens, and low cellularity and a lower percentage of tumor cells are associated with higher test failure rates. Future guidelines should consider the current data for specific recommendations regarding cytologic samples.