Prognostic value of peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic malignancies: a controversial issue

The Significance of Peritoneal Washing as a Prognostic Indicator for Ovarian Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

During ovarian cancer (OC) debulking surgery, the surgeon can examine the peritoneal cavity for malignant cancer cells with peritoneal washing (PW) cytology. The goal of this study was to examine the significance of peritoneal washing as a prognostic indicator for ovarian cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information considering the prognostic factors of OC and their impact in PW's result was collected, compared, and combined.

RESULTS

Omental metastasis, tumor type, tumor invasion, tumor size, tumor grade/ stage, tumor's cytoreduction, and recurrence affect both the peritoneal washing result and the patient's prognosis. The correlation that most of the above factors have with a positive PW and dismal prognosis, led us to the assumption that PW has a significance as a prognostic indicator.

CONCLUSION

The significance of PW as a prognostic indicator remains an assumption.

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer patients

Although peritoneal cytology has been shown to be an independant predictor of survival in endometrial cancer, the present international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification. This work aimed to assess the prognostic importance of PPC (positive peritoneal cytology) in endometrial cancer patients. The medical profiles of uterine carcinoma patients were reviewed who were referred to Khatam-al- Anbia and Bahman hospital within 2010-2019. The factors possibly affecting peritoneal fluid cytology in all patients were analysed. There was a considerable association between survival and the number of lymph nodes involvement (95% CI = 2.5 - 12.51, OR = 5.59, p < .001), stage 3 (95% CI = 2.95-22.10, OR = 7.12, p < .001), stage IV (95% CI = 2.14 - 30.09, OR = 8.04, p < .001), Grade (95% CI = 4.4-47.7, OR = 14.54, p < .001). Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer. Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Peritoneal cytology is one of the independent risk factors for poor survival for endometrial cancer, but international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification.What do the results of this study add? Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is recommended peritoneal cytology for future FIGO staging reviews. Till now, peritoneal washings need to be still regarded as a key part for precise risk-stratification.

Primary tumor types and origins in positive abdominopelvic washing cytology, a single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Abdominopelvic washing cytology is a common specimen evaluated for ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer staging or other nongynecologic malignancies presented as metastases. We reviewed our experience in diagnosing abdominopelvic washing specimens and assessing the primary tumor types and origins of the positive abdominopelvic washings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pathology archive database search was performed for abdominopelvic washing specimens from 2007 to 2018. The corresponding cytologic diagnoses, results of ancillary studies, clinical histories, and surgical follow-up were reviewed. The primary sites were determined based on the synoptic reports, when available.

RESULTS

A total of 5.8% (350 of 6023) of cases were positive for malignancy or neoplasm. Additionally, 1.3% (78 of 6023) were diagnosed as atypical cells. Of the 350 positive cases, 93.4% were müllerian tumors. The frequency of primary sites for müllerian tumors in descending order were: ovary, uterus, fallopian tube, peritoneum, and uncertain müllerian sites. The common ovarian tumors identified in pelvic washing in descending order were: high-grade serous carcinoma, serous borderline tumor, clear cell carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, and endometrioid carcinoma. Gastrointestinal, breast, bladder, and lymphoma primaries were the 23 nongynecologic tumors identified in pelvic washings.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive findings in abdominopelvic washing cytology is rare. The majority of the positive cases were from müllerian origins, with ovary and uterus as the most common sites. Endometrial adenocarcinoma, endometrioid type and ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma were the most common tumor types. Knowing prior history of malignancy, morphologic comparison with concurrent surgical cases, and performing ancillary studies are keys to improve diagnostic accuracy of abdominopelvic washings.

The prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer and its correlations with L1-CAM biomarker

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) in a cohort of patients with endometrial cancer (EC). The secondary objective was to correlate the PPC and the expression of L1CAM in a group of patients with recurrence endometrial disease.

METHODS

All women diagnosed with EC and who performed a peritoneal cytology at "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute of Rome from 2001 to 2013 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to positivity at peritoneal cytology. Moreover, patients with a recurrence disease and whose a tissue microarray (TMA) tumor sample was available underwent a L1CAM analysis.

RESULTS

Seven hundred sixty six patients underwent to EC staging in our Institute: 696 (90.8%) with negative and 70 (9.2%) with positive cytology. Five-year recurrence rate was higher in women with PPC (46.9% vs 18.4%, p = 0 < 0.0001) and, in particular, distant recurrence (86.7% vs 53.4%, p = 0.03). Moreover, we found an interesting pattern of recurrence disease in the group of early stage of EC with NPC and positive L1CAM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the data that PPC may be a potential prognostic factor in early EC, due to its significant association with other risk factors and its significant influence on survival. Our findings confirm the need for large studies that point out the role of PPC and new prognostic factors, including biomarkers as L1CAM.

Diaphragmatic smears are not of additional benefit in the detection of peritoneal spread in gynecological cancers

Peritoneal biopsies (PB) and peritoneal washing (PW) are routine measures in abdominal staging of gynecological malignancies and are used particularly for the assessment of occult microscopic tumor spread to the peritoneal surface including the diaphragm. Cytological diaphragmatic smears (DS) have been suggested as a supplemental tool; however, they are not routinely taken and their usefulness is still unclear. The present study retrospectively evaluated whether DS provide an additional benefit over PB and PW for the detection of peritoneal malignancies in patients with gynecological cancer. The data from patients who underwent laparotomy for suspected gynecological cancer and had DS and either PB, PW or ascites were reviewed. Sensitivity and specificity, and the number upstaged patients were determined. A total of 43 patients were excluded due to benign diagnosis (those with negative DS or PW) and 2 out of the remaining had 2 carcinomas simultaneously. Among these 41 malignancies, DS were positive in 12, PW in 18 and PB in 19 cases. No case was DS-positive while negative for both PB and PW. Four cases were missed when only PB and 5 when only PW was performed. Notably, no case of peritoneal disease was identified solely on positive DS, indicating that all 23 positive cases (presence of occult peritoneal disease in 56.1%) were identified by PB and PW together (100% sensitivity; 62% specificity). In addition, none of the cases was upstaged solely on positive DS results. Taken together, these data demonstrated that DS do not present an additional benefit to PW and PB in the detection of peritoneal gynecological disease.