1
|
Vadlakonda A, Curry J, Gao Z, Chervu N, Ali K, Lee H, Thompson CK, Benharash P. Current Status of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Investigating Structural Racial Disparity. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 239:253-262. [PMID: 38602342 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) remains a personal decision, influenced by psychosocial factors, including cosmesis and peace of mind. Although use of CPM is disproportionately low among Black patients, the degree to which these disparities are driven by patient- vs hospital-level factors remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing mastectomy for nonmetastatic ductal or lobular breast cancer were tabulated using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. The primary endpoint was receipt of CPM. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with interaction terms between Black-serving hospital (BSH) status and patient race to evaluate associations with CPM. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate long-term survival. RESULTS Of 597,845 women studied, 70,911 (11.9%) were Black. After multivariable adjustment, Black race (adjusted odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.67) and treatment at BSH (adjusted odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.85) were independently linked to lower odds of CPM. Although predicted probability of CPM was universally lower at higher BSH, Black patients faced a steeper reduction compared with White patients. Receipt of CPM was linked to improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.86), whereas Black race was associated with a greater HR of 10-year mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.17). CONCLUSIONS Hospitals serving a greater proportion of Black patients are less likely to use CPM, suggestive of disparities in access to CPM at the institutional level. Further research and education are needed to characterize surgeon-specific and institutional practices in patient counseling and shared decision-making that shape disparities in access to CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amulya Vadlakonda
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| | - Joanna Curry
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| | - Zihan Gao
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| | - Konmal Ali
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA (Lee)
| | - Carlie K Thompson
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery (Thompson), University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Peyman Benharash
- From the Department of Surgery (Vadlakonda, Curry, Gao, Chervu, Ali, Benharash)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fasano GA, Bayard S, Chen Y, Marti J, Simmons R, Swistel A, Bensenhaver J, Davis M, Newman L. Survival Outcomes in Women with Unilateral, Triple-Negative, Breast Cancer Correlated with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4648-4656. [PMID: 36681737 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13056-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increased utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), there is insufficient evidence that it improves survival in average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer. CPM may be of heightened interest to patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) because these patients are more likely to have BRCA1 mutation-associated disease and are not candidates for the chemoprevention benefits of adjuvant endocrine therapy. METHODS Survival and recurrence outcomes were evaluated for all TNBC patients from a multi-institutional database (1999-2018) at two academic cancer programs in two metropolitan cities of the Northeast and Midwest. Median follow-up time was 3.7 years. RESULTS Seven hundred and nighty six TNBC patients were evaluated and 15.45% underwent CPM. Women undergoing CPM were more likely to be white (p < 0.001), younger (p < 0.001), and underwent genetic testing (p < 0.001). A borderline survival benefit was observed for TNBC patients undergoing CPM (5-year overall survival 95.1% vs. 85.0%; p = 0.05). There was no difference in survival when BRCA mutation carriers were excluded (5-year overall survival 94.1% vs. 85.2%; p = 0.12). For BRCA mutation carriers, a numeric trend was observed for improved survival for patients undergoing CPM (5-year overall survival 97.2% vs. 84.1%; p = 0.35). Among patients not undergoing CPM, the rate of developing a new primary breast cancer was 2.2% (15/673). Among these 15 patients, 20% (3/15) were known BRCA mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate no survival benefit for TNBC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations undergoing CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve A Fasano
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Solange Bayard
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yalei Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Marti
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rache Simmons
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Swistel
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Melissa Davis
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Newman
- Department of Breast Surgery, New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122542. [PMID: 36554065 PMCID: PMC9777860 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young women (AYA) with breast cancer represent a unique patient population, compared to the general population with breast cancer. We performed a literature review to evaluate the factors that influenced the surgical outcomes in this patient population. Fifty-two studies were identified, which evaluated breast surgery type, axillary surgery, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), surgical timing, psychological factors, disparities, and imaging use. AYA patients had equivalent oncologic outcomes with breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. CPM did not improve survival. There are limited data on axillary management in the AYA population, and while more data would be beneficial, this is currently extrapolated from the general breast cancer population. A shorter time to initiate treatment correlated to better outcomes, and disparities need to be overcome for optimal outcomes. AYA patients appreciated involvement in clinical decisions, and shared decision making should be considered whenever possible. Providers must keep these factors in mind when counseling AYA patients, regarding the surgical management of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathelin C, Barranger E, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boutet G, Brousse S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Coutant C, Daraï E, Delpech Y, Duraes M, Espié M, Fornecker L, Golfier F, Grosclaude P, Hamy AS, Kermarrec E, Lavoué V, Lodi M, Luporsi É, Maugard CM, Molière S, Seror JY, Taris N, Uzan C, Vaysse C, Fritel X. [Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2022; 50:107-120. [PMID: 34920167 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the value of performing a risk-reducting mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer. DESIGN The CNGOF Commission of Senology, composed of 26 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted. METHODS The Commission of Senology considered 8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, familial (no identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's disease) risk. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival. RESULTS The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). CONCLUSION There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practice for performing or not performing RRM in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Mathelin
- CHRU, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | | | | | - Gérard Boutet
- AGREGA, service de chirurgie gynécologique et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Susie Brousse
- CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France.
| | | | - Charles Coutant
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Yann Delpech
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - Martha Duraes
- CHU de Montpellier, 191, avenue du Doyen-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex, France.
| | - Marc Espié
- Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Luc Fornecker
- Département d'onco-hématologie, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - François Golfier
- Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, bâtiment 3B, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | | | | | - Edith Kermarrec
- Hôpital Tenon, service de radiologie, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- CHU, service de gynécologie, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France.
| | | | - Élisabeth Luporsi
- Oncologie médicale et oncogénétique, CHR Metz-Thionville, hôpital de Mercy, 1, allée du Château, 57085 Metz, France.
| | - Christine M Maugard
- Service de génétique oncologique clinique, unité de génétique oncologique moléculaire, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | | - Nicolas Taris
- Oncogénétique, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Charlotte Vaysse
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, CHU Toulouse, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France.
| | - Xavier Fritel
- Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peleg Hasson S, Menes T, Sonnenblick A. Comparison of Patient Susceptibility Genes Across Breast Cancer: Implications for Prognosis and Therapeutic Outcomes. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2020; 13:227-238. [PMID: 32801835 PMCID: PMC7394592 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s233485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer syndromes affect a small (10–15% of cases) but significant group of patients. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most familiar and well-studied genes associated with inherited breast cancer. However, mutations in the high-penetrance genes, TP53, PTEN, CDH1, MSH1, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2, PALB2, and STK11, and in the moderate-penetrance genes, CHEK2, ATM, and BRIP1, also correlate with high lifetime risks of breast cancer and other malignancies as well. Advances in breast cancer genetics have led to an improved perception of diagnosis and screening strategies. The specific considerations and challenges involved in treating this unique population have become a fertile ground for research. Indeed, these genes and downstream molecular pathways have now become potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer patients, including those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This review describes the variety of hereditary breast cancer genes, from their molecular origins to the prognosis and multidisciplinary clinical decision-making processes. Key publications and other reported recent clinical trials and guidelines are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shira Peleg Hasson
- Oncology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tehillah Menes
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teoh V, Tasoulis MK, Gui G. Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with Unilateral Breast Cancer Who Are Genetic Carriers, Have a Strong Family History or Are just Young at Presentation. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E140. [PMID: 31935898 PMCID: PMC7016894 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is rising with increasing trends that are possibly highest in the USA. Whilst its role is generally accepted in carriers of recognized high-risk predisposition genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 when the affected individual is premenopausal, controversy surrounds the benefit in less understood risk-profile clinical scenarios. This comprehensive review explores the current evidence underpinning the role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its impact on contralateral breast cancer risk and survival in three distinct at-risk groups affected by unilateral breast cancer: known genetic carriers, those with strong familial risk but no demonstrable genetic mutation and women who are of young age at presentation. The review supports the role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in "high risk" groups where the evidence suggests a reduction in contralateral breast cancer risk. However, this benefit is less evident in women who are just young at presentation or those who have strong family history but no demonstrable genetic mutation. A multidisciplinary and personalized approach to support individuals in a shared-decision making process is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Teoh
- Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London SW36JJ, UK; (M.-K.T.); (G.G.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer without a family history or genetic predisposition : Consensus statement from the Austrian Gynecologic Oncology Working Group of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2019; 131:233-236. [PMID: 30887224 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-019-1468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The working group recommends against contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in women with breast cancer without a family history or genetic predisposition with unilateral breast cancer. This is based on the low risk of developing contralateral breast cancer, the lack of a survival benefit, the increased risk of surgical complications, and the lack of benefit on quality of life.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bouchard-Fortier A, Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Fernandes K, Camacho X, Graham P, Quan ML. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in young women with breast cancer: a population-based analysis of predictive factors and clinical impact. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e562-e568. [PMID: 30607124 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (cpm) has been increasingly common among women with unilateral invasive breast cancer (ibca) even though the data that support it are limited. Using a population-based cohort, the objectives of the present study were to describe factors predictive of cpm in young women (≤35 years) with ibca and to evaluate the impact of the procedure on mortality. Methods All women diagnosed during 1994-2003 and treated with cpm were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Logistic regression was used to identify patient and tumour factors associated with the use of cpm. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the effect of cpm on recurrence and mortality. Results Of 614 women identified, 81 underwent cpm (13.2%). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with cpm included negative lymph node status, negative estrogen receptor status, and initial breast-conserving surgery with re-excision. At follow-up, breast cancer-specific mortality was similar for women who did and did not undergo cpm. Conclusions Use of cpm in young women with ibca (compared with non-use) was not associated improved breast cancer-specific mortality. Factors found to be predictive of cpm were negative lymph node status, negative estrogen receptor status, and initial breast-conserving surgery followed by re-excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - R Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - K Fernandes
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - X Camacho
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - P Graham
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - M L Quan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Larson KE, Grobmyer SR, Valente SA. Evaluation of recurrence patterns and survival in modern series of young women with breast cancer. Breast J 2018; 24:749-754. [PMID: 29687541 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The data on oncologic outcomes in young women with breast cancer (BC) are dated as it relates to recurrences and mortality. Our goal was to assess these outcomes in a modern series of young women with BC. A retrospective chart review identified women ≤40 years old with stage I-III BC diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 at our institution. Demographics, tumor biology, type of operation, recurrence, and survival were analyzed. Overall, 322 women were identified. Most had ER+(70%) infiltrating ductal tumors (88%) with low stage (42% T1; 41% T2; 56% N0). Follow-up was 4.2 years with 5.6% local-regional recurrence (LRR), 15.2% metastatic recurrence (MR), and 8% mortality. There was no survival difference based on demographics, tumor biology, or type of operation. T3 tumors (P < .001) and node positivity (P < .001) were associated with worse disease-free survival. In this modern series of young women with BC, stage rather than tumor biology or surgical choice has more effect on recurrence-free survival. MR was more common than LRR, with most MR occurring within the first 2 years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey E Larson
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephen R Grobmyer
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie A Valente
- Division of Breast Services, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carbine NE, Lostumbo L, Wallace J, Ko H. Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4:CD002748. [PMID: 29620792 PMCID: PMC6494635 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002748.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent progress in understanding the genetic basis of breast cancer and widely publicized reports of celebrities undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) have increased interest in RRM as a method of preventing breast cancer. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2004 and previously updated in 2006 and 2010. OBJECTIVES (i) To determine whether risk-reducing mastectomy reduces death rates from any cause in women who have never had breast cancer and in women who have a history of breast cancer in one breast, and (ii) to examine the effect of risk-reducing mastectomy on other endpoints, including breast cancer incidence, breast cancer mortality, disease-free survival, physical morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes. SEARCH METHODS For this Review update, we searched Cochrane Breast Cancer's Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 9 July 2016. We included studies in English. SELECTION CRITERIA Participants included women at risk for breast cancer in at least one breast. Interventions included all types of mastectomy performed for the purpose of preventing breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently abstracted data from each report. We summarized data descriptively; quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity of study designs and insufficient reporting. We analyzed data separately for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM). Four review authors assessed the methodological quality to determine whether or not the methods used sufficiently minimized selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, and attrition bias. MAIN RESULTS All 61 included studies were observational studies with some methodological limitations; randomized trials were absent. The studies presented data on 15,077 women with a wide range of risk factors for breast cancer, who underwent RRM.Twenty-one BRRM studies looking at the incidence of breast cancer or disease-specific mortality, or both, reported reductions after BRRM, particularly for those women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Twenty-six CRRM studies consistently reported reductions in incidence of contralateral breast cancer but were inconsistent about improvements in disease-specific survival. Seven studies attempted to control for multiple differences between intervention groups and showed no overall survival advantage for CRRM. Another study showed significantly improved survival following CRRM, but after adjusting for bilateral risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (BRRSO), the CRRM effect on all-cause mortality was no longer significant.Twenty studies assessed psychosocial measures; most reported high levels of satisfaction with the decision to have RRM but greater variation in satisfaction with cosmetic results. Worry over breast cancer was significantly reduced after BRRM when compared both to baseline worry levels and to the groups who opted for surveillance rather than BRRM, but there was diminished satisfaction with body image and sexual feelings.Seventeen case series reporting on adverse events from RRM with or without reconstruction reported rates of unanticipated reoperations from 4% in those without reconstruction to 64% in participants with reconstruction.In women who have had cancer in one breast, removing the other breast may reduce the incidence of cancer in that other breast, but there is insufficient evidence that this improves survival because of the continuing risk of recurrence or metastases from the original cancer. Additionally, thought should be given to other options to reduce breast cancer risk, such as BRRSO and chemoprevention, when considering RRM. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS While published observational studies demonstrated that BRRM was effective in reducing both the incidence of, and death from, breast cancer, more rigorous prospective studies are suggested. BRRM should be considered only among those at high risk of disease, for example, BRCA1/2 carriers. CRRM was shown to reduce the incidence of contralateral breast cancer, but there is insufficient evidence that CRRM improves survival, and studies that control for multiple confounding variables are recommended. It is possible that selection bias in terms of healthier, younger women being recommended for or choosing CRRM produces better overall survival numbers for CRRM. Given the number of women who may be over-treated with BRRM/CRRM, it is critical that women and clinicians understand the true risk for each individual woman before considering surgery. Additionally, thought should be given to other options to reduce breast cancer risk, such as BRRSO and chemoprevention when considering RRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora E Carbine
- Georgetown University Lombardi Cancer CenterTranslational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC)WashingtonD.C.USA20007
| | | | | | - Henry Ko
- University of SydneyNHMRC Clinical Trials CentreK25 ‐ Medical Foundation Building92‐94 Parramatta Rd.,CamperdownNSWAustralia2050
- Academic Medicine Research Institute, Duke‐NUS Graduate Medical SchoolCentre for Health Services Research, SingHealthSingaporeSingapore169857
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in patients with sporadic breast cancer. Benefits and hazards. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:913-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
12
|
Shankar A, Roy S, Malik A, Kamal VK, Bhandari R, Kishor K, Mahajan M, Sachdev J, Jeyaraj P, Rath G. Contralateral breast cancer: a clinico-pathological study of second primaries in opposite breasts after treatment of breast malignancy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16:1207-11. [PMID: 25735357 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.1207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is by far the most frequent cancer of women (23 % of all cancers), ranking second overall when both sexes are considered together. Contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is becoming an important public health issue because of the increased incidence of primary breast cancer and improved survival. The present communication concerns a study to evaluate the role of various clinico-pathological factors on the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, menopausal status, family history, disease stage, surgery performed, histopathology, hormone receptor status, and use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. The diagnosis of CBC was confirmed on histopathology report. Relative risk with 95%CI was calculated for different risk factors of contralateral breast cancer development. RESULTS CBC was found in 24 (4.5%) out of 532 patients. Mean age of presentation was 43.2 years. Family history of breast cancer was found in 37.5% of the patients. There was statistically significant higher rate (83.3%) of CBC in patients in age group of 20-40 years with RR=11.3 (95% CI: 1.4, 89.4, p=0.006) seen in 20-30 years and RR=10.8 (95% CI:1.5-79.6, p=0.002) in 30-40 years as compared to older age of 60-70 years. Risk of development was higher in premenopausal women (RR=8.6, 95% CI: 3.5-21.3, p≤0.001). Women with family history of breast cancer had highest rate (20.9%) of CBC (RR=5.4, 95% CI: 2.5-11.6, p≤0.001). Use of hormonal therapy in hormone receptor positive patients was protective factor in occurrence of CBC but not significant (RR=0.7, 95% CI: 0.3-1.5, p=0.333). CONCLUSIONS Younger age, premenopausal status, and presence of family history were found to be significant risk factors for the development of CBC. Use of hormonal therapy in hormone receptor positive patients might be protective against occurrence of CBC but did not reach significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Shankar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Han KT, Park EC, Kim SJ, Jang SI, Shin J, Kim CO, Choi JW, Lee SG. Factors affecting the quality of life of Korean cancer survivors who return to the workplace. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15:8783-8. [PMID: 25374207 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.20.8783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the prevalence of cancer is increasing, it is no longer synonymous with death. The number of cancer survivors is estimated to be increasing due to development in medical treatments and social programs; cancer survivors are increasingly returning to work after long-term unemployment. Thus, we examined the quality of life (QOL) and the factors associated with return of cancer survivors to the workplace. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was performed using the 2008 Community Health Survey administered by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (N=548). We used Chi-square tests to compare demographic variables based on self-perceived health status, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare QOL scores among groups. We also performed a mixed-model analysis of the relationship between QOL and factors at the workplaces of cancer survivors. RESULTS Based on the results of our study, the overall QOL of cancer survivors was associated with 'mutual respect', 'free emotional expression', occupation, and age. Moreover, different trends of QOL according to self-perceived health were identified on additional analysis. In the 'bad' self-perceived health group, QOL was significantly different according to income. The QOL of cancer survivors in the low-income group was lower than in the other groups. Conversely, the 'normal' group had a lower QOL caused by 'no mutual respect' and "no free emotional expression" in the workplace. The QOL in the 'good' group based on self-perceived health was higher in the younger age group. CONCLUSIONS There may be a significant relationship between QOL and workplace factors for cancer survivors, although further study is needed to investigate this relationship in detail. This may facilitate formulation of policy and efforts to prevent and manage the decline in the QOL of cancer survivors returning to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Tae Han
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Davies KR, Cantor SB, Brewster AM. Better contralateral breast cancer risk estimation and alternative options to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Int J Womens Health 2015; 7:181-7. [PMID: 25678823 PMCID: PMC4324540 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s52380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has increased among women with breast cancer, despite uncertain survival benefit and a declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Patient-related reasons for undergoing CPM include an overestimation of the risk of CBC, increased cancer worry, and a desire to improve survival. We summarize the existing literature on CBC risk and outcomes and the clinical benefit of CPM among women with unilateral breast cancer who have a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast. Published studies were retrieved from the MEDLINE database with the keywords "contralateral breast cancer" and "contralateral prophylactic mastectomy". These include observational studies, clinical trials, survival analyses, and decision models examining the risk of CBC, the clinical and psychosocial effects of CPM, and other treatment strategies to reduce CBC risk. Studies that have evaluated CBC risk estimate it to be approximately 0.5% annually on average. Patient-related factors associated with an increased risk of CBC include carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, young age at breast cancer, and strong family history of breast cancer in the absence of a BRCA1/2 mutation. Although CPM reduces the risk of CBC by approximately 94%, it may not provide a significant gain in overall survival and there is conflicting evidence that it improves disease-free survival among women with breast cancer regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status. Therefore, alternative strategies such as the use of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, which reduce the risk of CBC by approximately 50%, should be encouraged for eligible women with ER-positive breast cancers. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of decision and educational tools that can be used for personalized counseling of patients regarding their CBC risk, the uncertain role of CPM, and alternative CBC risk reduction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalatu R Davies
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott B Cantor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abenaa M Brewster
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Basu NN, Barr L, Ross GL, Evans DG. Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: review of risk factors and risk-reducing strategies. Int J Surg Oncol 2015; 2015:901046. [PMID: 25692038 PMCID: PMC4322656 DOI: 10.1155/2015/901046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Revised: 01/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Rates of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy have increased substantially over the last decade. Surgical oncologists are often in the frontline, dealing with requests for this procedure. This paper reviews the current evidence base regarding contralateral breast cancer, assesses the various risk-reducing strategies, and evaluates the cost-effectiveness of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. N. Basu
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Department of Breast Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - L. Barr
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - G. L. Ross
- The Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - D. G. Evans
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- University of Manchester Department of Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zeichner SB, Cavalcante L, Suciu GP, Ruiz AL, Hirzel A, Krill-Jackson E. Long-term survival of women with locally advanced breast cancer with ≥ 10 involved lymph nodes at diagnosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15:3435-41. [PMID: 24870735 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.8.3435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axillary lymph node status at diagnosis remains the strongest predictor of long-term survival in breast cancer. Patients with more than ten axillary lymph nodes at diagnosis have a poor long-term survival. In this single institutional study, we set out to evaluate the prognosis of this high-risk group in the era of multimodality therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we looked at all breast cancer patients with greater than ten axillary lymph nodes diagnosed at Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC) from January 1st 1990 to December 31st 2007 (n=161). In the univariate analysis, descriptive frequencies, median survival, and 5- and 10-year survival rates were estimated for common prognostic factors. A multivariate prognostic analysis for time-to-event data, using the extended Cox regression model was carried out. RESULTS With a median and mean follow-up of 70 and 89.9 months, respectively, the overall median survival was estimated to be 99 months. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 59.3% and the ten-year DFS was 37.9%, whereas the five- and ten-year overall survival (OS) was 66.6% and 43.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant improvement in DFS among black patients compared to whites (p=0.05), improved DFS and OS among young patients (ages 21-45) compared to elderly patients (age greater than 70) (p=0.00176, p=0.0034, respectively), and improved DFS and OS among patients whose tumors were ER positive (p=0.049, p=0.0034). CONCLUSIONS In this single institution study of patients with greater than 10 positive axillary nodes, black patients had a significantly improved DFS compared with white patients. Young age and ER tumor positivity was associated with improved outcomes. Using multivariate analysis, there were no other variables associated with statistically significant improvements in DFS or OS including date of diagnosis. Further work is needed to improve breast cancer survival in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
|