Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology versus Concurrent Core Needle Biopsy in Evaluation of Intrathoracic Lesions: a Retrospective Comparative Study

Clinical value of CT-guided biopsy of small (≤1.5 cm) suspicious lung nodules: Diagnostic accuracy, molecular characterization and long-term clinical outcomes

Small pulmonary nodules (≤1.5 cm) are frequently detected on routine chest imaging and lung cancer screening studies. Our goal was to determine the clinical value of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in the evaluation of such nodules. In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed patient data (n = 44) for CNBs on lung nodules (≤1.5 cm) performed at our biopsy center between May 2017 and March 2020. We analyzed for the rate of pathology diagnosis, molecular/biomarker analysis, complications, and change in clinical management and outcome over a period ranging up to 60 months after biopsy. A pathology diagnosis of malignancy or benign lesion was obtained in 97.9% of biopsies in this cohort. The rate of complications was low with only 6.8% of patients requiring the insertion of a temporary small profile interventional radiology (IR) pigtail chest tube for pneumothorax. Out of the subset of biopsy specimens that were sent for tissue molecular analysis, 90% had enough tissue preserved after initial pathological analysis to obtain at least one molecular marker. Our data show that CT-guided CNB is safe and reliable, and should be considered for the evaluation of small, suspicious lung nodules found on routine screenings for the early detection and evaluation of malignant lesions.

Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment by different rapid staining techniques for rapid on-site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost-effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a technique beneficial in determining the adequacy of the samples, thereby increasing the diagnostic yield, useful in triage of specimens for ancillary studies and can also help determine a preliminary diagnosis in emergency cases. The different rapid stains for on-site evaluation described in the literature are diff quik, toluidine blue (TB), brilliant cresyl blue (BCB), ultra-fast Pap stains, and rapid hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). This study was undertaken as there is sparse literature regarding the best and the most cost-effective rapid stain.

METHOD

Fine needle aspiration samples from 200 patients with palpable swellings in easily accessible regions were taken. Smears stained by rapid and routine stains were assessed based on four parameters, with provisional diagnosis on the rapid stained smears. A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the rapid stains was carried out with appropriate statistical tests with the routinely stained smears as gold standard.

RESULTS

There was adequate material in 100% of ROSE smears. rapid pap stained smears showed well preserved cytoplasmic details, nuclear details, and background details. The time taken was least with TB and BCB being 5 s each. The most cost-effective was found to be TB.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that TB is the most cost-effective, quick, least labor-intensive, and reliable rapid stain for ROSE especially in resource-poor settings.