Once-weekly subcutaneous administration of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma

Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy for hematological malignancies: A review

Chemotherapy is one of the main treatments for hematologic malignancies. However, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common long-term toxic reactions in chemotherapy, and the occurrence of CIPN affects patients' quality of life and can cause interruption of chemotherapy in severe cases, thus reducing the efficacy of chemotherapy. We currently summarize the existing CIPN animal models, including the characteristics of several common animal models such as bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy, vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy, and oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. It was found that CIPN may lead to behavioral, histopathological, and neurophysiological changes inducing peripheral neuropathy. However, the mechanism of CIPN has not been fully elucidated, especially the prevention and treatment protocols need to be improved. Therefore, this review article summarizes the progress of research on CIPN animal models and the possible mechanisms and treatment of CIPN.

Drug-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis and Management

Peripheral neuropathy comes in all shapes and forms and is a disorder which is found in the peripheral nervous system. It can have an acute or chronic onset depending on the multitude of pathophysiologic mechanisms involving different parts of nerve fibers. A systematic approach is highly beneficial when it comes to cost-effective diagnosis. More than 30 causes of peripheral neuropathy exist ranging from systemic and auto-immune diseases, vitamin deficiencies, viral infections, diabetes, etc. One of the major causes of peripheral neuropathy is drug induced disease, which can be split into peripheral neuropathy caused by chemotherapy or by other medications. This review deals with the latest causes of drug induced peripheral neuropathy, the population involved, the findings on physical examination and various workups needed and how to manage each case.

Outcomes with different administration schedules of bortezomib in bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) as first-line therapy in multiple myeloma

Induction therapy for multiple myeloma with bortezomib (Velcade), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (d) (VRd) was traditionally administered as bortezomib given twice weekly on a 3 week cycle. A modified schedule of weekly bortezomib has been adopted over time to decrease treatment burden for patients and reduce treatment-emergent neuropathy. This study evaluates the response rates and outcomes with different schedules of bortezomib in VRd administered for first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with upfront VRd from June 30th 2008 to December 31st 2018, for variations of bortezomib administration. Five hundred and fifty-five (555) NDMM patients met inclusion criteria; median age 63 years and 61% men. Bortezomib was administered twice weekly every 21 days in 43%, once weekly every 21 days in 41% and once weekly every 28 days in 16%. Though peripheral sensory neuropathy was more frequent with twice weekly dosing (P = .002), this group achieved shorter time to best response (P = .01). Weekly every 21-day treatment saw higher VGPR or better rates (P = .02). However, with median follow up time of 37 months (IQR 22-56), we found no difference in PFS or OS among the groups. While small differences in response rates were found among the varying administration schedules of bortezomib administration, there was no significant effect on PFS or OS. Given that VRd remains a first line standard of care option for newly diagnosed MM, in the absence of a large trial comparing bortezomib dosing schedule modifications, these results are helpful in supporting current practices of once weekly administration.

The effect of rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B on peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients

Background: Peripheral neuropathy can induce marked disability and negative effects on quality of life and is the most common therapy-related complication in multiple myeloma patients treated with bortezomib. Currently, there is no useful method to prevent or treat it. So, it is necessary to study the clinical efficacy of rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients. Methods: Sixty multiple myeloma patients who developed peripheral neuropathy after bortezomib-based chemotherapy in Jiaxing First Hospital from October 2015 to May 2018 were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Changes in serum NGF level and electromyograms before and after treatment were analyzed, and the effects were evaluated via a FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire score. Results: After treatment, the NGF level in the treatment group (13.2 ± 3.73 pg/ml) was higher than that in the control group (9.22 ± 2.93 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Improvements in the electromyograms were more pronounced in treatment group than those in the control group, with statistical significance. The FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire scores, both in the treatment group and the control group, were decreased (4.00 ± 1.58 vs. 5.20 ± 2.33; P < 0.05), and the alleviation of the symptoms in the treatment group were more obvious. Conclusion: Rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B is a safe and effective method for treating peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients.

Once-weekly bortezomib had similar effectiveness and lower thrombocytopenia occurrence compared with twice-weekly bortezomib regimen in treating patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in China

The study aims to examine the treatment effect and adverse reactions of patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving different bortezomib-based regimens.This was a retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed MM and who were treated with bortezomib-based combined chemotherapy at the Department of Hematology of the 2 affiliated hospitals of Wenzhou Medical University between July 2009 and May 2016. Cox proportion hazard multivariate analyses were carried out to assess the differences in treatment effect and adverse events between standard (1.3 mg/m on days 1, 4, 8, 11) and weekly (1.6 mg/m on days 1, 8, 15) cohorts, as well as the differences between intravenous injection and subcutaneous injection therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.Among the 117 patients, 78 patients were treated with bortezomib standard therapy and 39 patients were treated with bortezomib weekly therapy (all with intravenous injection). In all patients, the treatment strategy was not independently associated with PFS or OS. The patients in the weekly therapy group had less thrombocytopenia events than those in the standard therapy group. The subcutaneous route had similar treatment effect as the intravenous route, but the incidence of peripheral neuropathy was lower.The once-weekly bortezomib regimen was similar in effectiveness to standard therapy in treating patients with newly diagnosed MM, but the incidence of thrombocytopenia was lower with the weekly regimen compared with the standard regimen.

Tolerance, Kinetics, and Depth of Response for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib Combination in Chinese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is an important toxicity that limits the use of bortezomib (Btz). Attempts to reduce PN have included its subcutaneous (SC) administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 307 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from a single Chinese center, receiving Btz-based regimens administered either via SC injection (SC group, n = 167) or intravenous (IV) infusion (IV group, n = 140). The efficacy and safety of Btz administration via SC and IV were then compared.

RESULTS

Most baseline characteristics were similar between these 2 groups. A lower frequency of adverse events, especially grade ≥ 3 PN (P = .002), was observed in the SC group compared with the IV group. The estimated median Btz dosage when PN developed was higher (20.8 mg/m2 vs. 15.6 mg/m2), and fewer patients reduced or discontinued Btz owing to adverse events in the SC group compared with the IV group. The overall response rate (≥ partial response [PR]) was comparable (94.8% vs. 96.2%). However, patients in the IV group required fewer cycles to achieve PR, whereas a larger proportion of patients in the IV group achieved ≥ very good PR. After a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 1-84 months), no significant difference in median progression-free survival (not arrived vs. 33.0 ± 2.735 months) and overall survival (not arrived vs. 56.0 months) was noted.

CONCLUSION

SC Btz is associated with better tolerance; however, IV administration achieves a faster and deeper response in Chinese patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Proteasome-associated deubiquitinases and cancer

Maintenance of protein homeostasis is a crucial process for the normal functioning of the cell. The regulated degradation of proteins is primarily facilitated by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), a system of selective tagging of proteins with ubiquitin followed by proteasome-mediated proteolysis. The UPS is highly dynamic consisting of both ubiquitination and deubiquitination steps that modulate protein stabilization and degradation. Deregulation of protein stability is a common feature in the development and progression of numerous cancer types. Simultaneously, the elevated protein synthesis rate of cancer cells and consequential accumulation of misfolded proteins drives UPS addiction, thus sensitizing them to UPS inhibitors. This sensitivity along with the potential of stabilizing pro-apoptotic signaling pathways makes the proteasome an attractive clinical target for the development of novel therapies. Targeting of the catalytic 20S subunit of the proteasome is already a clinically validated strategy in multiple myeloma and other cancers. Spurred on by this success, promising novel inhibitors of the UPS have entered development, targeting the 20S as well as regulatory 19S subunit and inhibitors of deubiquitinating and ubiquitin ligase enzymes. In this review, we outline the manner in which deregulation of the UPS can cause cancer to develop, current clinical application of proteasome inhibitors, and the (pre-)clinical development of novel inhibitors of the UPS.

Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Bortezomib Administration for Multiple Myeloma Patients: a Meta-analysis

Bortezomib, the first potent therapeutic proteasome inhibitor, has been suggested as a standard care in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, evidence bearing on the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) administration of bortezomib for MM patients is controversial. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib via SC vs. IV administration on MM patients. Sixteen trials with a total of2575 patients with MM (SC, n=1191; IV, n=1384) were included in our meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between these two arms regarding overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), or very good partial response (VGPR). The pooled RRs for rate of adverse events (AEs), such as thrombocytopenia and bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN), were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.92) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.79), respectively. Moreover, there was much more largely decreased incidence of grade 3 and higher thrombocytopenia and BIPN in bortezomib SC administration than IV route. In general, alternative SC administration should be considered instead of IV administration in use of bortezomib for patients with MM. Key words: bortezomib; multiple myeloma; meta-analysis; subcutaneous administration.

Neuropathy and efficacy of once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib in multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis

INTRODUCTION

Randomized studies have shown that bortezomib (BTZ) can be given weekly via intravenous (IV) route or twice weekly via subcutaneous (SC) route with lower neuropathy risk and no loss of anti-myeloma efficacy compared to original standard IV twice weekly schedule. Weekly SC should therefore yield the best therapeutic index and is widely used but has not been compared to established administration schedules in the context of a clinical trial.

METHODS

Comprehensive electronic medical record review was done for disease control and neuropathy symptoms of 344 consecutive patients who received their first BTZ-containing regimen for myeloma or AL amyloidosis before or after we changed to SC weekly in December 2010. Univariate and multivariable analyses were carried out that adjusted for age, underlying disease, concurrently used anticancer agents, underlying conditions predisposing to neuropathy, and number of prior regimens compared SC weekly to other schedules.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received BTZ SC weekly, 17 SC twice weekly, 127 IV weekly and 147 IV twice weekly. Risk for neuropathy of any grade was higher with other schedules compared to SC weekly (44.3% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.001) while response rate was similar (72.1% vs. 76.6%, respectively, p = 0.15). Multivariable analyses upheld higher neuropathy risk (Odds ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.26-4.76, p = 0.008) while the likelihood of not achieving a response (= partial response or better) was comparable (Odds ratio 1.25, 95% CI 0.58-2.71, p = 0.56) for other schedules compared to SC weekly, respectively. Lower neuropathy risk translated into longer treatment duration when BTZ was started SC weekly (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly SC BTZ has activity comparable to other schedules and causes low rates of neuropathy.

International Scoring System in Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) is an acquired B-cell malignant proliferation of anti- body secreting plasma cells, characterized by end organ damage due to monoclonal immunoglobulin secretion. The aim of this study wa to determine the stage stratification according to an international scoring system in adult Pakistani MM patients at presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single centre retrospective study extendedfrom January 2012 to December 2015. Data were retrieved from the departmental maintained records.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were diagnosed at our center with MM during the period of the study, 25 males and 14 females. Age ranged between 36 and 81 with a mean of 54.5±14.8 and a median of 57 years. Common presenting complaints included fatigue (80.9%), backache (79.3%) and bone pain (66.2%). Overall, 9 patients were in ISS stage I (23%), 12 were in stage II (30.7%) and 18 were in stage III (46.1%). Out of the total, 29 (74.3%) had kappa immunoglobulin andthe remaining 10 (25.6%) had lambda type myelomas. IgG myeloma was commonest, seen in 26 (66.6%) followed by IgA in 11 (28.2%) with non secretory myeloma in one (2.5%) and light chain disease also in one patient (2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

MM in Pakistani patients is seen in a relatively young population with male predominance. Primarily patients are symptomatic and risk stratification revealed a predominance of advanced stage III disease in our setting.

Multiple Myeloma: a Retrospective Analysis of 61 Patients from a Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an acquired clonal B-cell malignancy which primarily affects elderly individuals with an annual incidence of approximately 1% of all malignancies. Our aim is to study demographic and clinicopathological features of adult Pakistani MM patients at presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single centre retrospective study extended from January 2010 to December 2014. Data were retrieved from the patients' maintained records on predetermined performa.

RESULTS

Overall, 61 patients were diagnosed at our institution with MM during the study period. There were 43 males and 18 females. Age ranged between 34 and 81 years with a mean of 56.1±12.8 and a median of 57 years. The male to female ratio was ~2:1. Common presenting complaints included fatigue (81.9%), backache (80.3%) and bone pain (67.2%). Physical findings revealed pallor (44.2%) as a presenting clinical feature. The mean hemoglobin value was 8.9±1.7g/dl with a mean MCV of 85.3±11.0 fl. Severe anemia with hemoglobin <8.5 gm/dl was seen in 40.9%. The mean total leukocyte count was 8.9±8.2x109/l, the ANC was 5.0±3.1x109/l and the mean platelet count was 188.4±150.6x109/l.

CONCLUSIONS

MM in Pakistani patients is seen in a relatively young population with male preponderance. The majority of patients present with symptomatic anemia and backache to seek medical attention. However, clinico-pathological features appear comparable to the published literature.

Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Despite the significant therapeutic advances achieved with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as bortezomib and carfilzomib in prolonging the survival of patients with multiple myeloma, the development of drug resistance, peripheral neuropathy, and pharmacokinetic limitations continue to pose major challenges when using these compounds. Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs. Unlike bortezomib and carfilzomib, which are administered by injection, ixazomib is the first oral PI approved by US Food and Drug Administration. This review discusses the biochemical properties, mechanisms of action, preclinical efficacy, and clinical trial results leading to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of ixazomib.