Three Weekly Versus Weekly Cisplatin as Radiosensitizer in Head and Neck Cancer: a Decision Dilemma

Improving Radiotherapy Response in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

The application of radiotherapy to the treatment of cancer has existed for over 100 years. Although its use has cured many, much work remains to be done to minimize side effects, and in-field tumor recurrences. Resistance of the tumor to a radiation-mediated death remains a complex issue that results in local recurrence and significantly decreases patient survival. Here, we review mechanisms of radioresistance and selective treatment combinations that improve the efficacy of the radiation that is delivered. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms of radiation resistance is warranted to develop not just novel treatments, but treatments with improved safety profiles relative to current radiosensitizers. This review is written in memory and honor of Dr. Peter Stambrook, an avid scientist and thought leader in the field of DNA damage and carcinogenesis, and a mentor and advocate for countless students and faculty.

A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study Between Weekly Cisplatin Versus Three Weekly Cisplatin with Radiotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

To compare the efficacy, compliance and the complications of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 against the three weekly cisplatin 100 mg/m2 with EBRT(external beam radiotherapy) in unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(LAHNSCC) Study design was Prospective randomized and comparative.85 Patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA LAHNSCC presenting from December 2017 to May 2019 were assigned to concurrent three weekly cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (arm 1) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 (arm 2) with EBRT. There were 41 patients were in arm 1 and 44 patients in arm 2. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 2.0. At 4 week of completion of treatment, response was assessed using RECIST(1.1) criteria.In Arm 1,61% patients and in arm 2 55% patients achieved complete response but the difference was statistically non- significant (p = 0.756).Median follow up was 12 months after which 49% patients in arm 1 and 38% in arm 2 had complete response whereas 12% patients in arm 1 and 15.5% patients in arm 2 had locoregional relapse. There was no statistically significant difference between the two arms in terms of mucositis, nausea,vomiting, dysphagia, acute skin reaction and ototoxicity. Leukopenia (p = 0.003),thrombocytopenia (p = 0.04) and acute renal toxicity (p  = 0.004) was significantly more in three weekly arm. As compared to three weekly cisplatin, weekly cisplatin with radiotherapy is an acceptable approach in a limited resource setting due to good patient compliance where a large number of patients are treated on outpatient basis.

Precision Medicine Gains Momentum: Novel 3D Models and Stem Cell-Based Approaches in Head and Neck Cancer

Despite the current progress in the development of new concepts of precision medicine for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), in particular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI), overall survival rates have not improved during the last decades. This is, on the one hand, caused by the fact that a significant number of patients presents with late stage disease at the time of diagnosis, on the other hand HNSCC frequently develop therapeutic resistance. Distinct intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity is one of the strongest features in HNSCC and has hindered both the identification of specific biomarkers and the establishment of targeted therapies for this disease so far. To date, there is a paucity of reliable preclinical models, particularly those that can predict responses to immune CPI, as these models require an intact tumor microenvironment (TME). The "ideal" preclinical cancer model is supposed to take both the TME as well as tumor heterogeneity into account. Although HNSCC patients are frequently studied in clinical trials, there is a lack of reliable prognostic biomarkers allowing a better stratification of individuals who might benefit from new concepts of targeted or immunotherapeutic strategies. Emerging evidence indicates that cancer stem cells (CSCs) are highly tumorigenic. Through the process of stemness, epithelial cells acquire an invasive phenotype contributing to metastasis and recurrence. Specific markers for CSC such as CD133 and CD44 expression and ALDH activity help to identify CSC in HNSCC. For the majority of patients, allocation of treatment regimens is simply based on histological diagnosis and on tumor location and disease staging (clinical risk assessments) rather than on specific or individual tumor biology. Hence there is an urgent need for tools to stratify HNSCC patients and pave the way for personalized therapeutic options. This work reviews the current literature on novel approaches in implementing three-dimensional (3D) HNSCC in vitro and in vivo tumor models in the clinical daily routine. Stem-cell based assays will be particularly discussed. Those models are highly anticipated to serve as a preclinical prediction platform for the evaluation of stable biomarkers and for therapeutic efficacy testing.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: a novel strategy for tumor radiosensitization

Recently, the focus of enhancing tumor radiosensitivity has shifted from chemotherapeutics to targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are a novel class of selective cell cycle therapeutics that target the cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex and induce G1 phase arrest. These agents have demonstrated favorable effects when used as monotherapy or combined with endocrine therapy and targeted inhibitors, stimulating further explorations of other combination strategies. Multiple preclinical studies have indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitors exhibit a synergistic effect with radiotherapy both in vitro and in vivo. The principal mechanisms of radiosensitization effects include inhibition of DNA damage repair, enhancement of apoptosis, and blockade of cell cycle progression, which provide the rationale for clinical use. CDK4/6 inhibitors also induce cellular senescence and promote anti-tumor immunity, which might represent potential mechanisms for radiosensitization. Several small sample clinical studies have preliminarily indicated that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and radiotherapy exhibited well-tolerated toxicity and promising efficacy. However, most clinical trials in combined therapy remain in the recruitment stage. Further work is required to seek optimal radiotherapy-drug combinations. In this review, we describe the effects and underlying mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitors as a radiosensitizer and discuss previous clinical studies to evaluate the prospects and challenges of this combination.

The Role of Erastin in Ferroptosis and Its Prospects in Cancer Therapy

Erastin was initially discovered as a small molecule compound that selectively kills tumor cells expressing ST and RAS^V12 and was later widely investigated as an inducer of ferroptosis. Ferroptosis is a recently discovered form of cell death caused by peroxidation induced by the accumulation of intracellular lipid reactive oxygen species (L-ROS) in an iron-dependent manner. Erastin can mediate ferroptosis through a variety of molecules including the cystine-glutamate transport receptor (system X_C⁻), the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), and p53. Erastin is able to enhance the sensitivity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, suggesting a promising future in cancer therapy. We hope that this review will help to better understand the role of erastin in ferroptosis and lay the foundation for further research and the development of erastin-based cancer therapies in the future.

Cisplatin Weekly Versus Every 3 Weeks Concurrently with Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: What Is the Best Dosing and Schedule?

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare cisplatin at 2 dose levels given concurrently with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC. The main objectives were to evaluate treatment toxicities, loco-regional control, tumor response and patients compliance.

METHODS

Patients were randomized into two groups that either received 30 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly (arm A) or 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks (arm B). Radiotherapy prescribed dose was 70Gy in 33 fractions. Treatment adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with locally advanced HNSCC were included in this study. Recruitment started at the beginning of July 2016 and ended in July 2019. The Median follow-up was 24 months. Acute non-hematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher during the treatment course were significantly more observed in Arm B patients (76.6%) compared to Arm A patients (56.6%) with a P-value of 0.007. Hematological toxicities in the form of anemia, leucopenia and neutropenia were also significantly higher in Arm B patients with a p-value of 0.435, 0.002 & 0,002, respectively. The median 2 year loco-regional control rate in Arm B was 72.8% versus 57.6% in Arm A with a p-value of 0.015. Complete responses were similar between both groups (77%). Compliance to treatment was better in Arm A with 70% of the patients received at least 6 weekly doses where as 60% of the patients in Arm B completed the three cycles of treatment and 40 % received only 2 cycles.

CONCLUSION

Once weekly low dose cisplatin treatment showed lower acute toxicity and a better compliance compared to once every 3 weeks high dose cisplatin treatment at the expense of a lower loco-regional control.

Drug eruptions associated with tumor therapy: Great imitators

Many studies have investigated cutaneous reactions to antitumor drugs and found them to be quite numerous. We describe drug eruptions that may be associated with different therapies by class: antimetabolite chemotherapeutics, genotoxic agents, spindle inhibitors, signal transduction inhibitors, and immunotherapies. Methotrexate is most often associated with mucocutaneous reactions, alkylating antimetabolite agents with hyperpigmentation, and platinum antimetabolite agents with type I IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Anthracycline derivatives can induce the hand-foot syndrome in patients, and bleomycin is associated with a bleomycin-induced flagellate erythema. Taxane spindle inhibitors can result in acneiform eruptions, which may also be seen with use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Imatinib and its derivatives can cause a truncal maculopapular eruption, whereas multikinase inhibitors can produce a hand-foot-skin reaction. Vemurafenib can result in squamous cell carcinomas and photosensitivity. First-generation mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may cause a maculopapular eruption initially involving the face and neck. Programmed death (PD)-1-ligand and receptor inhibitors are associated with bullous pemphigoid. Ipilimumab, targeting Cytotoxic -T- Lymphocyte- associated (CTLA-4) receptors, can cause a morbilliform reaction, whereas Interleukin -2 (IL-2) analogs can create the capillary leak syndrome. Chemotherapeutic drug eruptions classically can manifest in the aforementioned ways; however, it is important to understand that they are associated with myriad cutaneous adverse effects, which may be mistaken for organic skin disease. Oncologists prescribing these medications should be familiar with the cutaneous side effects of these medications, and so they may counsel patients to be on the lookout for them.

Comparison between hypo-fractionated dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional concurrent chemo-radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a pilot study

Objective:

In the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC), both dose escalation and hypo-fractionation can improve tumour control rates with uncertain role of addition of concurrent chemotherapy. We aimed at developing a new radiotherapy protocol for patients not eligible to receive the standard concurrent chemo-radiation therapy (CCRT) with little toxicity profile.

Methods:

A total of 63 LA-HNC patients were randomised to receive either: 70 Gy in 35 fx in 7 weeks concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 3 doses (Arm A) or 74 Gy in 33 fx in 6·5 weeks (Arm B). Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were created for both treatment arms. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and acute and late toxicity between the two arms.

Results:

A total of 33 patients were in Arm A versus 30 patients in Arm B with median follow-up 24·2 months. No significant differences in LC, PFS and OS between the two arms. Complete remission occurred in 54·5 and 63·3% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively. All toxicities were significantly less in Arm B than Arm A.

Conclusion:

Slightly dose-escalated hypo-fractionated regimen is safe and feasible and has comparable efficacy and less acute and late side effects than conventional dose CCRT with avoidance of chemotherapy-related toxicities in LA-HNC patients.

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m² given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m² given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m² given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m² resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m², and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

Breast cancer subtype and stage are prognostic of time from breast cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis development

Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with breast cancer risk factors associated with rapid development of BCBM could potentially benefit from early brain metastasis screening. We retrospectively reviewed all BCBM patients treated with brain radiotherapy at our institution from 1997 to 2015. Interval time to BCBM was defined as date of pathologic breast cancer diagnosis to date of radiographic evidence of brain metastasis. Patients were stratified by breast cancer molecular subtype and stage at diagnosis. Kaplan Meier analysis was conducted on time to development of BCBM. Breast cancer risk factors were correlated with time to BCBM on Cox proportion hazard analysis. The study cohort comprised 121 BCBM patients, with median interval time to BCBM of 46 months. Times to BCBM for Her2+/2HR+, Her2+, Her2-/HR+, and triple-negative (TNBC) subtypes were 70, 44, 42, and 28 months respectively (p = 0.002). Time to BCBM for stages I, II, III, and IV were 70, 54, 29, and 24 months, respectively (p = 0.000). BCBM patients were further stratified by both molecular subtype (TNBC vs. non-TNBC) and stage (I, II vs. III, IV). Median times to BCBM for non-TNBC/stage I-II, TNBC/stage I-II, non-TNBC stage III-IV, and TNBC/stage III-IV were 68, 47, 29, and 6 months respectively (p = 0.000). Subtype and stage were associated with shorter time to BCBM on multivariate analysis. Subtype and initial stage are independently correlated with decreased time to development of BCBM. Patients with advanced high stage and triple negative breast cancer develop brain metastases significantly earlier.

Toxicities of systemic agents in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN); A new perspective in the era of immunotherapy

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a difficult to treat malignancy and represents the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Systemic therapy has a critical role in the treatment of locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic disease. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been primarily used along with radiation and surgery, with cisplatin being the standard of care choice of therapy. When contraindications to cisplatin exist, other agents such as carboplatin, taxanes, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab are used. Similarly, in the advanced or metastatic setting, platinum agents, taxanes and cetuximab have been predominantly utilized. With the recent approval of novel agents such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and their distinct toxicity profiles, an understanding of the potential sequelae of the different systemic agents is essential to the careful selection of agents in the advanced disease setting. Going forward, choosing novel agents will be weighed against traditional chemotherapy, and understanding the toxicities at stake is critical in this process. In addition to providing an overview of the toxicity profile of the different systemic agents, we also provide a perspective into the future of SCCHN treatment.

Do selective radiation dose escalation and tumour hypoxia status impact the loco-regional tumour control after radio-chemotherapy of head & neck tumours? The ESCALOX protocol

Background

Standard of care primary treatment of carcinoma of locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LAHNSCC) consists of platinum-based concomitant chemo-irradiation. Despite progress in the treatment of LAHNSCC using modern radiotherapy techniques the outcome remains still poor. Using IMRT with SIB the escalation of total dose to the GTV is possible with the aim to improve clinical outcome. This study tests the hypothesis if radiation dose escalation to the GTV improves 2-year-LRC and -OS after concomitant chemo-irradiation.

Methods

The ESCALOX trial is a prospective randomized phase III study using cisplatin chemo-irradiation and the SIB-IMRT concept in patients with LAHNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx to escalate the total dose to the GTV up to 80.5 Gy. Chemotherapy is planned either in the 1^st and 5^th week (cisplatin 20 mg/m²/d d 1–5 and d 29–33) or weekly (cisplatin 40 mg/m²/d) during RT. RT is delivered as SIB with total doses of 80.5 Gy/70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.3 Gy/2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy in the experimental arm and in the control arm with 70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy. A pre-study with dose escalation up to 77.0 Gy/70.0 Gy/56.0 Gy with 2.2 Gy/2.0 Gy and 1.6 Gy is demanded by the German federal office of radiation protection (BfS). In the translational part of the trial 100 of the randomised patients will be investigated by 18-F-FMiso-PET-CT for the presence and behaviour of tumor hypoxia twice in the week before treatment start.

Discussion

The primary endpoint of the pre-study is acute radiation induced toxicity. Primary endpoint of the main trial is 2-year-LRC. By using the dose escalation up to 80.5 Gy to the GTV of the primary tumor and lymph nodes > 2 cm a LRC benefit of 15% at 2 years should be expected. The ESCALOX trial is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG); Grant No.: MO-363/4-1.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT 01212354, EudraCT-No.: 2010-021139-15

A Comparative Study on Weekly Versus Three Weekly Cisplatinum Based Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers

INTRODUCTION

Head and Neck Cancers constitute around 30% of cancers occurring in India and majority of cases present with locoregionally advanced disease. Cisplatin based concurrent chemoradiation is the most common modality of definitive treatment in these advanced cases. However, it is unclear regarding priority of weekly versus three weekly cisplatin based concurrent chemoradiation schedule in treatment of such advanced diseases.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy in terms of response, locoregional control, and disease status in both the arms, and to compare the acute and late toxicity in both arms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty untreated patients of locally advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of head and neck were randomized into two arms: Arm A (n=15) patients received injection cisplatin 30 mg/m² weekly along with radiation; Arm B (n=15) patients received injection cisplatin 100 mg/m² on a three weekly basis along with radiation. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 66 Gy in conventional fractionation schedule in telecobalt machine.

RESULTS

Major toxicities included mucositis, dermatitis, vomiting, neutropenia, and anaemia. There was a trend towards increase in grade-III leukopenia and grade-III dermatitis in arm A compared to arm B, and increase in grade-III mucositis and grade-III vomiting in arm B in comparison to arm A although statistically not significant. Within a median follow-up of seven months, in arm A complete response was 73.33% (11/15) and partial response was 26.67%; whereas in arm B complete response was 85.71% (12/14) and partial response was 14.29%, which was not statistically significant. However, there was a trend towards better efficacy in arm B.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, weekly cisplatin arm is as good as three weekly cisplatin arms. But efficacy is not statistically significant. However, there was a trend of three weekly cisplatin arms towards better efficacy, with comparable haematological and mucosal toxicities.