Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Uterine Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcoma (US) is a highly malignant cancer with poor prognosis and high mortality in women. In this study, we evaluated the expression of human fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) in different US subtypes and the relationship between survival and clinicopathological characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative analysis of FGF23 gene expression in different pathological types of US. Utilizing a cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas of 57 patients, a 50-patient microarray dataset (GSE119043) from the Gene Expression Omnibus and a Suining cohort of 44 patients, we analyzed gene expression profiles and corresponding clinicopathological information. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression level of FGF23 in four US subtypes. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between FGF23 expression and prognosis in US patients.

RESULTS

Compared with uterine normal smooth muscle and uterine leiomyoma, FGF23 expression was significantly upregulated in US and was differentially expressed in four US subtypes. Uterine carcinosarcoma exhibited the highest expression of FGF23 among the subtypes. Survival analysis revealed no correlation between FGF23 expression and either overall survival or progression-free survival in US (P > 0.05). Similar results were obtained from the validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no significant correlation between FGF23 expression and the US prognosis. Tumor stage, CA125, and tumor recurrence were independent prognostic factors for survival of US patients.

CONCLUSION

FGF23 was highly expressed in US and was promising as a novel potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of US.

Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Single-Center Experience

Background Uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are associated with more recurrence and higher mortality compared to other uterine cancers. Considering the limited number of case series in the literature, the limited effectiveness of standard treatment methods, and the inadequacy of molecular biomarkers, we planned to investigate the effects of treatment methods and survival outcomes in these patients. Methodology The study was designed retrospectively, and the records of patients who were followed up and treated at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Oncology Clinic, between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, were reviewed. Patients over 18 years of age with a pathological diagnosis of uterine LMS were included. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were recorded using the hospital database. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging was reassessed for each patient in accordance with the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition (2017). Tumor size, location, and grade were also evaluated. Types of treatments, protocols, and adverse effects were recorded. Relapsed patients, relapse localization, and treatments given at relapse were recorded and compared.  Results Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 53.7 years. The median follow-up time was 39.3 months. The localization of LMS could be detected in 22 (78.57%) patients, among them 20 (90.9%) patients had intramural, 1 (4.5%) had submucosal, and 1 (4.5%) had subserosal LMS. All patients (26, 92.8%) underwent primary surgery, except for 2 (7.14%) patients who were metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Adjuvant treatment suggestion was made for 7 (25%) patients with a high risk of recurrence in the multidisciplinary tumor council. Partial response was observed in 1 (3.5%) of the 2 (7.1%) metastatic patients, and stable disease was observed in the other. Recurrence was detected in 22 (84.6%) patients . Fifteen (53.6%) patients died during the follow-up period. Survival was better in premenopausal patients (99.2 versus 51.6 months, P = 0.056). No significant difference was found when the survival of patients who received and did not receive adjuvant treatment were compared. In relapsed patients, there was no significant difference in survival between patients who underwent and did not undergo surgical treatment. Conclusions Uterine LMS is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited diagnostic methods, frequent recurrences, high mortality, and limited use of nonsurgical treatments. The positive effect of adjuvant treatment on survival has not been demonstrated. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of hormone receptor status on prognosis and new biomarkers.

Prognostic factors, oncological treatment and outcomes of uterine sarcoma: 10 years' clinical experience from a tertiary care center in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcoma is an uncommon aggressive malignancy. Optimal management and prognostic factors have yet to be well recognized due to their rarity and various histological subtypes. This study aims to investigate these patients' prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma and treated from January 2010 to December 2019 in a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan. The data were analyzed using STATA software and stratified on the histological subtype. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CI were estimated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients, 16(40%) had uterine leiomyosarcoma (u-LMS), 10(25%) had high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), 8(20%) had low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) and 6(15%) had other histological subtypes. The median age of all patients was 49 (40-55.5). Thirty-seven (92.5%) patients underwent primary surgical resection, and 24 (60%) patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. The survival plots showed the overall population's DFS of 64 months and the OS of 88 months (p-value = 0.001). The median DFS in all patients was 12 months, and the median OS was 14 months (p-value = 0.001). A small but significant DFS benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, 13.5 versus 11 months (p-value = 0.001). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that large tumor size and advanced FIGO stage were substantial factors associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

Uterine sarcomas are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. Multiple factors, including tumor size, mitotic count, stage of the disease, and myometrial invasion, impact survival outcomes. Adjuvant treatment may decrease the recurrence rate and improve DFS but do not affect OS.

Safety and feasibility of laterally extended endopelvic resection for sarcoma in the female genital tract: a prospective cohort study

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) for sarcoma in the female genital tract.

Methods

We prospectively recruited gynecologic cancer patients with sarcoma arising from female genital tract who underwent LEER at Seoul National University Hospital from December 2016 to March 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes including postoperative complications and pain control, and survival outcomes of the patients were investigated.

Results

A total of nine patients were registered for this study. The median age was 56 years. Carcinosarcoma (n=2, 22%), leiomyosarcoma (n=2, 22%), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (n=2, 22%) were common histology types. Complete resection was achieved in 88.9%. The most common location of pelvic sidewall tumors was infra-iliac acetabulum (66.7%). The pathologic outcome showed a median tumor size of 9.0 cm and internal iliac vessel resection with pelvic sidewall muscle was performed in all patients. The median estimated blood loss was 1,600 mL (range, 300–22,300), and the patients were postoperatively admitted to the intensive care unit for median 1 day (range, 0–8). Complete response was observed in 44.4% (4/9) in radiologic studies after LEER, and median progression-free survival, treatment-related survival, and overall survival were 3.3, 19.6, and 98.9 months, respectively.

Conclusion

LEER was feasible and safe in treating recurrent sarcoma presenting pelvic sidewall invasion with acceptable survival outcomes and manageable postoperative complications.

Uterine Sarcoma: Retrospective Study From A Single institute

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are heterogeneous group of tumours comprising 1% of gynaecological malignancies. There is lack of concences on optimal treatment of uterine sarcomas. This is because of lack of randomised controlled trials due to rarity of these tumours. Surgical management without spill remains the standard primary treatment. Most of the times uterine sarcomas are diagnosed postoperatively from histopathology report of either myomectomy or hysterectomy. This retrospective study analysed the clinico pathological characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment details and survival outcome of different types of uterine sarcomas.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 59 patients of uterine sarcomas. All patients underwent surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation treatment were given according to histopathological report and FIGO stage. Patients were followed up every three months for first two years and then every six months. Disease free survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS) were calculated.

Statistical analysis

The data were summarized using descriptive statistics as mean, percent and range. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the significance of difference between the survival curves were calculate using log-rank test.

Results

Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive tumours of uterus. Majority of these tumours present in early stage. Surgery remains the main treatment modality. Role of adjuvant radiation treatment remains controversial. Tumour stage is the most important prognostic factor.

MR Imaging of uterine sarcomas: a comprehensive review with radiologic-pathologic correlation

The aim of this article is to summarize the MRI features of each sarcoma subtype and to correlate them with its pathological findings. Literature review through PubMed/Medline database to identify relevant articles on uterine sarcomas, with a special emphasis on their MRI findings and pathological features. While several, more generalistic, MRI findings of a uterine tumour should raise suspicion for malignancy (including irregular contour, intra-tumoral necrosis/hemorrhage and low ADC values), some particular features may suggest their specific histological subtype such as the gross lymphovascular invasion associated with endometrial stromal sarcomas, the "bag of worms" appearance of the low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and the "lattice-like" aspect of adenosarcomas which results from the mixed composition of solid and multiseptated cystic components. Knowledge of the different histological uterine sarcoma subtypes, their specific MRI features and comprehension of their pathological background allows for a more confident diagnosis and may indicate the correct histological subtype.

The systemic treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review. No news is good news?

BACKGROUND

Uterine leiomyosarcomas are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors. The systemic treatment of these tumors includes chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, there are still a lot of unanswered questions regarding the ideal therapeutic approach.

METHODS

We have conducted a systematic review of the treatment strategies of uterine leiomyosarcomas for the last ten years.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is still a matter of dilemma. Doxorubicin based chemotherapy or the combination of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel are the regimens of choice for the first line setting. Beyond the first line, there are several options;, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and recently efforts of introducing immunotherapy to the therapeutic armamentarium of clinicians treating uterine leiomyosarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the efforts of the clinicians dealing with uterine leiomyosarcomas, the optimal therapeutic algorithm is yet to be described.

The value of clinical parameters combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for preoperatively distinguishing different subtypes of uterine sarcomas: An observational study (STROBE compliant)

To investigate clinical parameters combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in preoperative identification of different subtypes of uterine sarcomas including uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), and carcinosarcoma (CS).Data from 71 patients with uterine sarcoma confirmed by surgery and pathology were collected. The clinical characteristics, conventional MRI features, mean ADC values, minimum ADC values, and lesion-muscle ADC ratio (rADC) values were compared with different subtypes of uterine sarcomas.Age, clinical manifestation, tumor location, shape, and T1-weighted image (T1WI) signals were significantly different between CS and LMS or ESS (all P < .01). The presence of band sign was significantly higher in ESS than in LMS or CS (both P < .001). The cystic change or necrosis and enhancement could help to differentiate LMS from ESS or CS (both P < .02). Significant differences were observed in T2-weighted image (T2WI) signals of the solid components of LMS compared with CS (P < .001). There was a significant difference between ESS and CS in the rADC values (P = .004).Clinical parameters combined with MRI features could help narrowing preoperative diagnostic possibilities in distinguishing subtypes of uterine sarcomas. These findings may be beneficial in helping guide operative decisions.

Prognostic factors, survival outcomes, and surgical practices when dealing with uterine sarcomas: 8 years’ clinical experience

Objective

To determine the clinical and pathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, surgical practice, adjuvant therapies, and survival outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma diagnosed and treated in our institution.

Material and Methods

Patients diagnosed and treated for uterine sarcomas at our institution from 2009 to 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. All histologic slides from the specimens underwent a thorough pathologic review by a gynecologic pathologist. The following variables were assessed: age, family history of cancer, smoking status, age of menarche, parity, age at first delivery, related symptoms, clinical staging, histologic type, treatment received, disease-free period, and the time and site of recurrence, as well as treatment of the latter and overall survival.

Results

Ten patients were diagnosed as having leiomyosarcoma, a further 10 patients had malignant mixed mullerian tumors, and five had endometrial stromal sarcoma; the remaining nine patients had other tumors. At the end of our study, 12 (35.3%) patients were alive and in remission, four (11.8%) were alive with disease, 10 (29.4%) were lost to follow-up, and eight (23.5%) had died. The mean survival time was 80.92 months, and the 2-year survival rate was 75.6%. We found that survival was significantly shorter in the presence of lymph node involvement, residual tumor, and recurrence.

Conclusion

This study serves to inform physicians about the outcome of various uterine sarcomas that were diagnosed and managed at our center. We found that 35.3% of our patients were alive and in remission, 11.8% were alive with disease, 29.4% were lost to follow-up, and 23.5% of patients died.

Utility of Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric MRI as Predictive Factors for Differentiating Uterine Sarcoma From Atypical Leiomyoma

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to find clinical parameters and qualitative and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for differentiating uterine sarcoma from atypical leiomyoma (ALM) preoperatively and to calculate predictive values for uterine sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 60 patients with uterine sarcoma and 88 patients with ALM confirmed by surgery and pathology were collected. Clinical parameters, qualitative MRI features, diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient values, and quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of these two tumor types were compared. Predictive values for uterine sarcoma were calculated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patient clinical manifestations, tumor locations, margins, T2-weighted imaging signals, mean apparent diffusion coefficient values, minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values, and time-signal intensity curves of solid tumor components were obvious significant parameters for distinguishing between uterine sarcoma and ALM (all P <.001). Abnormal vaginal bleeding, tumors located mainly in the uterine cavity, ill-defined tumor margins, and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of <1.272 × 10^-3mm²/s were significant preoperative predictors of uterine sarcoma. When the overall scores of these four predictors were greater than or equal to 7 points, the sensitivity, the specificity, the accuracy, and the positive and negative predictive values were 88.9%, 99.9%, 95.7%, 97.0%, and 95.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of clinical parameters and multiparametric MRI as predictive factors was beneficial for diagnosing uterine sarcoma preoperatively. These findings could be helpful for guiding treatment decisions.