Transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion: going for broke?

Practical Implementation of Anticoagulation Strategy for Patients Undergoing Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Anticoagulation is routinely prescribed to patients with persistent AF before cardioversion to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events. As direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a rapid onset of action, a consistent anticoagulant effect, if taken correctly, and do not need monitoring or dose adjustments, there is considerable interest in their use for patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. Post-hoc analyses show that DOACs are safe to use prior to and following cardioversion. In addition, two randomised controlled trials, X-VeRT and ENSURE-AF, have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the DOACs rivaroxaban and edoxaban, respectively, in this setting. The use of DOACs allows cardioversions to be performed promptly and reduces the number of cancelled procedures compared with the use of warfarin.

Role of transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation

Electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently performed to relieve symptoms and improve cardiac performance. Patients undergoing cardioversion are treated conventionally with therapeutic anticoagulation for three weeks before and four weeks after cardioversion to decrease the risk of thromboembolism. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy has been proposed as an alternative that may lower stroke and bleeding events. Patients without atrial cavity thrombus or atrial appendage thrombus by TEE are cardioverted on achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation, whereas cardioversion is delayed in higher risk patients with thrombus. The aim of this review is to discuss the issues and controversies associated with the management of patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. We provide an overview of the TEE-guided and conventional anticoagulation strategies in light of the recently completed Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) clinical trial. The two management strategies comparably lower the patient's embolic risk when the guidelines are properly followed. The TEE-guided strategy with shorter term anticoagulation may lower the incidence of bleeding complications and safely expedite early cardioversion. The inherent advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are presented. The TEE-guided approach with short-term anticoagulation is considered to be a safe and clinically effective alternative to the conventional approach, and it is advocated in patients in whom earlier cardioversion would be clinically beneficial.

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has evolved over the past decade as a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation management. Its use grew out of a need for a more predictable, dependable, and convenient approach to this difficult management dilemma, which has become increasingly prevalent in practice as an increasing number of patients present to clinics and hospitals with atrial fibrillation. In addition to its use in risk stratification of patients scheduled to undergo cardioversion, this management strategy allows for early cardioversion, which enables a minimal delay in proceeding from the diagnosis to the institution of therapy (electrical cardioversion). This review explores the evolution of the transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, and possible modifications to the strategy that would allow for a more convenient, practical, and more widely acceptable approach in the near future.