Seven Intracranial Aneurysms in One Patient: Treatment and Review of Literature

Outcome of Microsurgical Clipping for Multiple Versus Single Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Institution Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of microsurgical clipping for single intracranial aneurysm (SIA) and multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIA) and compare the outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgery for intracranial aneurysm (IA) at our institution over a 3-year period (June 2013 to May 2016) were included in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients with 225 IAs were included. Forty-one of these patients had MIA (109 IAs, mean, 2.7 ± 1.2; range, 2-7), and remaining 116 had SIA. In the patients with MIA, all aneurysms were secured during the same admission whenever possible. Depending on the locations of the IAs and condition of brain during surgery (tense/lax), all aneurysms were secured on same day (in a single session, single or multiple craniotomy in 28 patients) or on different days (multiple sessions in 13 patients). Postoperative control angiography (DSA) before discharge could be done for 216 aneurysms (MIA, n = 105; SIA, n = 111). Successful occlusion of the aneurysm from circulation was noted in 96.2% (101/105) of MIA and 93.7% (104/111) of SIA. Follow-up of 6 months or longer was available for 146 patients. A modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 was considered a good outcome. Univariate analysis of the entire group revealed no significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients with SIA and MIA both at discharge (good outcome: MIA, 82.9%; SIA, 93.1%; P = 0.068) and at a final follow-up of ≥6 months (good outcome: MIA, 87.2%; SIA, 94.4%; P = 0.164). Clipping for MIA was not associated with poor outcome in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable clinical outcomes and high rates of complete aneurysm occlusion following microsurgical clipping can be expected in patients with SIA and patients with MIA.

Accuracy in Identifying the Source of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Setting of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid hemorrhage cases with multiple cerebral aneurysms frequently demonstrate a hemorrhage pattern that does not definitively delineate the source aneurysm. In these cases, rupture site is ascertained from angiographic features of the aneurysm such as size, morphology, and location.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the frequency with which such features lead to misidentification of the ruptured aneurysm.

METHODS : Records of patients who underwent surgical clipping of a ruptured aneurysm at our institution between 2004 and 2014 and had multiple aneurysms were retrospectively reviewed. A blinded neuroendovascular surgeon provided the rupture source based on the initial head computed tomography scans and digital subtraction angiography images. Operative reports were then assessed to confirm or refute the imaging-based determination of the rupture source.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one patients had multiple aneurysms. Seventy-one patients had definitive hemorrhage patterns on initial computed tomography scans and 80 patients had nondefinitive hemorrhage patterns. Thirteen (16.2%) of the cases with nondefinitive hemorrhage patterns had discordance between the imaging-based determination of the rupture source and intraoperative findings of the true ruptured aneurysm, yielding an imperfect positive predictive value of 83.8%. Of all multiple aneurysm cases with subarachnoid hemorrhage treated by surgical or endovascular means at our institution, 4.3% (13 of 303) were misidentified.

CONCLUSION

Morphological features cannot reliably be used to determine rupture site in cases with nondefinitive subarachnoid hemorrhage patterns. Microsurgical clipping, confirming obliteration of the ruptured lesion, may be preferentially indicated in these patients unless, alternatively, all lesions can be contemporaneously and safely treated with endovascular embolization.

A Patient with Eight Intracranial Aneurysms: Endovascular Treatment in Two Sessions

The frequency of multiple intracranial aneurysms seen in patients with or without subarachnoid hemorrhage is high. The advancement of the endovascular technique and devices has ensured that endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is the first choice in most cases, especially in unruptured ones. Different combinations of treatment modalities and techniques can be used in the management of multiple aneurysms. But in selected patients without subarachnoid hemorrhage, treatment of all aneurysms in one or more sessions with endovascular techniques is less traumatic than that with surgery. In the literature, the maximum number of aneurysms in one patient treated endovascularly and/or surgically is seven. In this case report, we present, with a review of the literature, a patient with eight intracranial aneurysms, all of which were treated in two sessions with various endovascular techniques. A 40-year-old female patient was admitted due to headache. Angiography showed eight aneurysms in the posterior circulation and, bilaterally, in the anterior circulation. All aneurysms were treated endovascularly in two sessions. In the treatment of the aneurysms, different endovascular techniques were used including flow diverters stents, stent-assisted coiling, Y-stent-assisted coiling, and coiling alone.