Modified Supraorbital Keyhole Approach to Anterior Circulation Aneurysms

'What's in a name', a systematic review of the pterional craniotomy for aneurysm surgery and its many modifications with a proposal for simplified nomenclature

BACKGROUND

The pterional or frontosphenotemporal craniotomy has stood the test of time and continues to be a commonly used method of managing a variety of neurosurgical pathology. Already described in the beginning of the twentieth century and perfected by Yasargil in the 1970s, it has seen many modifications. These modifications have been a normal evolution for most neurosurgeons, tailoring the craniotomy to the patients' specific anatomy and pathology. Nonetheless, an abundance of variations have appeared in the literature.

METHODS

A search strategy was devised according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. To identify articles investigating the variations in the pterional approach, the following search terms were applied: (pterional OR minipterional OR supraorbital) AND (approach OR craniotomy OR technique).

RESULTS

In total, 3552 articles were screened with 74 articles being read in full with 47 articles being included for review. Each article was examined according the name of the technique, temporalis dissection technique, craniotomy technique and approach.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review gives an overview of the different techniques and modifications to the pterional craniotomy since it was initially described. We advocate for the use of a more standardised nomenclature that focuses on the target zone to simplify the management approach to supratentorial aneurysms.

Cosmetic Outcomes of Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy Via Eyebrow Incision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background  Supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy is a minimally invasive alternative to a frontotemporal craniotomy and is often used for tumor and vascular pathologies. The purpose of this study was to investigate how patient cosmetic outcomes are affected by technique variations of this approach. Methods  PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched, and results were reported according to PRISMA guidelines. For the meta-analysis portion, the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used, and the primary end points were patient satisfaction and percentage of permanent cosmetic complications. Results  A total of 2,629 manuscripts were identified. Of those, 124 studies (8,241 surgical cases) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 93.04 ± 11.93% of patients reported favorable cosmetic outcome following supraorbital craniotomy, and mean number of cases with permanent cosmetic complications was 6.62 ± 12.53%. We found that vascular cases are associated with more favorable cosmetic outcomes than tumor cases ( p  = 0.0001). Addition of orbital osteotomy or use of a drain is associated with adverse cosmetic outcomes ( p  = 0.001 and p  = 0.0001, respectively). The location of incision, size of craniotomy, utilization of an endoscope, method of cranial reconstruction, skin closure, use of antibiotics, and addition of pressure dressing did not significantly impact cosmetic outcomes ( p  > 0.05 for all). Conclusions  Supraorbital craniotomy is a minimally invasive technique associated with generally high favorable cosmetic outcomes. While certain techniques used in supraorbital keyhole approach do not pose significant cosmetic risks, utilization of an orbital osteotomy and the addition of a drain correlate with unfavorable cosmetic outcomes.

Keyhole approach in anterior circulation aneurysm: Current indication, advantages, technical limitations, complications and their avoidance

Keyhole surgery recently evolved as a minimal invasive surgical approach for treatment of anterior circulation aneurysm. This review was done to evaluate the keyhole approach for anterior circulation aneurysms, their indications, advantages, technical limitations, complications and their avoidance. The literature review was performed with the phrase "keyhole approach for anterior circulation aneurysm" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, Google scholar and Embase data base to identify all the articles published till December 2020. Out of 113 articles searched, 22 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing these articles, there was total 2058 aneurysm in 1871 patients. Out of 2058 aneurysm, 988 were ruptured and 547 unruptured. In 5 studies, which include 344 aneurysms in 344 cases, aneurysm ruptured or unruptured status was not specified. The most frequent aneurysm site was anterior communicating artery (n=573). The size of the aneurysm mentioned in most of the study was <15 mm. The rate of complete occlusion was ranged from 93.6-100%. The range of intra operative rupture (IOR) was 0-28.6%. The mean operative time was ranged from 70 min-5.34 hours as reported in 13 studies. Good outcome [Glasgow outcome scale (GOS): 4-5] were seen in 75-100% cases. The frontalis muscle weakness has been reported in 3 studies and ranged from 0-1.99%. Keyhole surgery can be a safe and effective treatment modality for treatment of a selected anterior circulation aneurysm. In the experienced hand it has certain advantages over standard pterional craniotomy.

Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy via Eyebrow Incision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Supraorbital eyebrow keyhole craniotomy is a minimally invasive alternative to a frontotemporal craniotomy and is often used for tumor resection and aneurysm clipping. The purpose of this study is to provide a contemporary review on the outcomes related to this approach and to determine whether they vary with the type of pathology and the addition of an endoscope.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched, and results were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. For the meta-analysis portion, the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 2629 manuscripts were identified. of those, 124 studies (8241 surgical cases) met the inclusion criteria. Mean total complication rate was 26.7 ± 25.7% and the mean approach-related mortality rate was 1.3 ± 2.8%. Technical success, defined as gross total tumor resection or complete aneurysm clipping, was achieved in 83.6 ± 21.5% of the cases. Vascular pathologies were associated with greater technical success, lower total complications, and longer length of hospital stay compared with tumor cases (P < 0.05 for all). For vascular cases, addition of the endoscope yielded lower technical success (P = 0.001) and lower complication rate (P = 0.041). The use of the endoscope for tumor pathologies did not affect technical success, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, operative time, or reoperation rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The supraorbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision is a feasible minimally invasive approach with an overall high technical success rate for both vascular and tumor pathologies.

Facial Nerve Preservation for Supraorbital Approaches: Anatomical Mapping Based on Consistent Landmarks

BACKGROUND

The supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKA) provides a safe and advantageous access to the anterior cranial fossa. The implemented skin incision varies depending on surgeon's preferences and requirements. Facial nerve (FN) injury might appear in up to 5.6% of patients. There is a lack of validated tenets for avoiding FN injury.

OBJECTIVE

To define a safety area for FN preservation during a SOKA.

METHODS

Ten dried skulls and 5 injected cadaveric heads (10 sides) were used. A Cartesian frame was created with its horizontal axis at the level of the supraorbital notch and the vertical axis just lateral to the frontozygomatic junction (FZj). FNs were dissected and points along their course were registered and transferred to the Cartesian frame.

RESULTS

Ten microscopic dissections of the FN were performed preserving all branches. A safety area could be defined 8 mm superior and 10 mm inferior to the FZj extending medially to the supraorbital notch and beyond. A 20 mm2 area superior and lateral to the FZj provided low probability (≤10%) of injuring the FN. Similarly, starting 4 mm inferior to the FZj, a lateral safety area was also found. A probabilistic colored heat map was built to represent the results.

CONCLUSION

We provide a "safety zone" for a SOKA incision in which the probability to encounter the FN is low. Clinical studies following our method may validate our findings and add evidence to the tenets for minimizing morbidity related to the SOKA incision.

[A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of the eyebrow supraorbital approach in cerebral aneurysm surgery]

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of supraorbital eyebrow (SEA) and pterional (PA) approaches in surgery of anterior circle of Willis (ACW) aneurysms and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of SEA in aneurysm clipping.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis included 166 patients with ACW aneurysms aged 18 to 70 years who were treated in the Neurosurgery Department of the Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center (Kazan) in the period from 2013 to 2016. At the first stage of the study, factors affecting surgical outcomes were compared (by using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS)) in subpopulations of patients operated on using SEA (n=49) and PA (n=117). At the second stage, we compared the efficacy and safety of approaches using a case-control subanalysis in appropriate subgroups of the SEA (n=37) and PA (n=37) groups. The subgroups were comparable in the following factors: gender, age, severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) on (Fisher scale), severity of the patient's condition (Hunt-Hess scale), size and location of the aneurysm, surgery duration, intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IOAR), amount of blood loss, rate of frontal sinus surgery, rate of nasal CSF leak, rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, hemorrhagic and ischemic complications according to postoperative CT, patient's satisfaction with the cosmetic result of surgery (visual analogue scale - VAS), and treatment outcomes (GOS). Treatment outcomes (GOS) and patient's satisfaction with the cosmetic result of surgery (VAS) were considered as the efficacy parameters. The safety parameters included the amount of blood loss, rate of frontal sinus surgery, rate of nasal CSF leak, and rate of intraoperative and postoperative (hemorrhagic and ischemic) complications.

RESULTS

At the first stage of the study, we found that the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the subpopulation of patients with ACW aneurysms who were operated on using SEA was statistically significantly less than that in the PA group (p=0.0000002). In the postoperative period, patients who underwent surgery using SEA less frequently experienced neurological deficit (p=0.003), less frequently developed first epileptic seizures (p=0.035), and had a lower rate of hemorrhagic complications (p=0.003) and better treatment outcomes (GOS) (p=0.01). Comparison of appropriate subgroups in the SEA and PA groups, which were selected according to the case-control methodology and were comparable in the main factors affecting treatment outcomes, confirmed statistically significantly lower blood loss for SEA (p=0.0000002) than for PA. Compared to the SEA group, the PA group was characterized by more frequent, but not statistically significantly different, IOAR (p=1), postoperative worsening of neurological deficit (p=0.115), newly developed epileptic seizures (p=0.493), and hemorrhagic complications (p=0.0557). There were no deaths in both groups. In the SEA group, the treatment outcome was scored 4 and 5 (GOS, favorable outcome); in the PA group, the treatment outcome was scored 3 (GOS) in 2 (5.4%) patients and 4 or 5 in 35 (94.6%) patients (p=0.063). The mean subjective score of satisfaction with the treatment result (VAS) in the SEA group was significantly higher (9.4±1) than in the PA group (8.8±1; p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

SEA is an adequate approach for clipping ACW aneurysms, in particular ACA-AComA and MCA aneurysms, which is as effective and safe as the pterional approach.

Supraorbital keyhole versus pterional craniotomies for ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched analysis

The safety and efficacy of the supraorbital keyhole approach for aneurysm surgery have not been well researched through a high-quality controlled study. The objective of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the supraorbital and pterional approaches for ruptured anterior communicating aneurysm (AComAn). A total of 140 patients, with 70 patients in each group, were enrolled after 1:1 propensity score matching. Clinical variables, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively compared. Baseline characteristics were equivalent between the two groups. Significantly shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss were observed in the supraorbital group compared to the pterional group (141.9 min vs. 184.5 min, P < 0.001; 160.4 ml vs. 250.7 ml, P = 0.008). The incidence of intraoperative aneurysm rupture was similar between the groups (20% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.830). The rate of procedural complications involving subdural hematoma and intracranial infection was lower in patients treated through the supraorbital (10.0%) vs. the pterional approach (32.9%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed for the incidence of ischemic events (15.7% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.654). Within a median 33.4-month (range, 11-67 months) follow-up, a similar proportion of patients achieved a favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale IV or V) across the two groups (83.6% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.285), while better cosmetic results were observed in the supraorbital group (94.0%) vs. the pterional group (86.2%, P = 0.129). According to our results, we recommend the keyhole approach for AComAn surgery for neurosurgeons who have gained sufficient experience with this technique due to its advantages over the pterional approach.

Median Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for Clipping Ruptured Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm: Technical Report with Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

The minimally invasive approach to distal anterior cerebral artery (DACA) aneurysms has not gained much acceptance due to difficulties associated with the conventional frontal paramedian approach. The more proximal basal interhemispheric approach, however, necessitates extensive dissection of soft tissues. We describe a novel minimally invasive median supraorbital keyhole craniotomy with a basal interhemispheric approach for clipping a ruptured DACA aneurysm.

METHODS

A 62-year-old patient presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Computed tomography angiography revealed a DACA aneurysm. The surgical technique involved a keyhole craniotomy made via an eyebrow incision extending between the supraorbital notches, and flush with the anterior cranial fossa. The dura was opened at the anterior part, the falx was cut, an interhemispheric dissection was carried out, adequate proximal control was obtained, and the aneurysm neck was dissected and clipped. A relevant review of the literature was carried out.

RESULTS

The patient recovered well, with no residual aneurysm or forehead numbness, with good cosmesis. Compared with the previously described "keyhole unilateral interhemispheric" approaches, our technique has less likelihood of encountering bridging veins; easier cisternal cerebrospinal fluid release, making it feasible even in swollen brain; better proximal vascular control; and trajectory toward the neck rather than dome.

CONCLUSION

The median supraorbital keyhole approach is a minimally invasive technique sufficient for clipping most DACA aneurysms, with easier access, better proximal control, and good cosmesis.