A Meta-analysis for Evaluating Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Clinical Efficacy of Neuroendoscopy Combined with Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in postoperative complications and prognosis between patients treated with neuroendoscopy versus conventional craniotomy surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 107 patients with HICH were included. Among them, 58 underwent neuroendoscopy (Group A), while 49 underwent conventional craniotomy under microscopic guidance (Group B). Intracranial pressure monitoring was applied in both groups. The clinical data, incidence of postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative intracranial pressure values, and rate of favorable prognosis were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference in baseline clinical data upon admission was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative intracranial pressure did not differ between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), but the postoperative intracranial pressure in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P < 0.05). After intervention with the different surgical approaches, Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and a significantly higher rate of favorable prognosis compared with Group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroendoscopy combined with Intracranial pressure monitoring is a safe and reliable approach for the treatment of HICH that reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and improves the recovery of neurological function after surgery.

Neuroendoscopy surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage with concurrent brain herniation: a retrospective study of comparison with craniotomy

Background

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage combined with cerebral hernia (HIH-CH) is a serious condition. Neuroendoscopy can effectively remove intracranial hematoma, but there is no relevant research support for its utility in patients with HIH-CH. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopy in patients with HIH-CH.

Methods

Patients with HIH-CH who received craniotomy or neuroendoscopy treatment were included. The patients were divided into craniotomy (CHE) group and neuroendoscopy (NEHE) group. Clinical data and follow-up outcome of the two groups were collected. The primary outcome was hematoma clearance.

Results

The hematoma clearance rate (%) of patients in NEHE group was 97.65 (92.75, 100.00), and that of patients in CHE group was 95.00 (90.00, 100.00), p > 0.05. The operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume of patients in NEHE group were significantly less than those in CHE group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the volume of residual hematoma and the incidence of rebleeding between the two groups (p > 0.05). The length of stay in ICU in NEHE group was significantly shorter than that in CHE group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Neuroendoscopy can safely and effectively remove the intracranial hematoma in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral hernia, significantly shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage, shorten the ICU stay.

Post-operative rebleeding in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: factors and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To explore factors affecting postoperative rebleeding in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 724 patients with SSICH treated at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2018 to October 2021. Finally, 294 people were eligible to be included in this study. Hematoma locations were classified as basal ganglia, thalamus, subcortex, or intraventricular. Surgery was categorized as neuroendoscopic surgery, burr hole (stereotactic drilling and drainage), or open craniotomy. Postoperative rebleeding was recorded. The incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of postoperative rebleeding were evaluated.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed. Postoperative rebleeding occurred in 57 patients (19.83%, 57/294). Univariate logistic regression analysis identified these risk factors for rebleeding: admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, irregular hematoma morphology by preoperative Computed Tomography (CT), postoperative hypertension, hematoma location, surgical method (P<0.05), and preoperative hematoma volume (P<0.1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed admission GCS score, irregular hematoma morphology by preoperative CT, postoperative hypertension, hematoma location, and surgical method as significant risk factors (P<0.05). Burr hole surgery and basal ganglia hematomas were associated with increased odds of rebleeding, and the mortality rates in patients with rebleeding versus no rebleeding were 7.02% versus 0.84%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroendoscopic surgery, craniotomy, and burr hole are all effective for treating SSICH, but burr hole surgery was an important risk factor for rebleeding and an adverse outcome. Admission GCS score, irregular hematoma morphology, blood pressure control, hematoma location, and surgical method are affected the risk of postoperative rebleeding. 3D Slicer-assisted neuroendoscopic surgery may be the most effective treatment for many patients with SSICH.

Endoscopic surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Treatment for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (SSICH) is limited and consist of either best medical treatment (BMT) or surgical hematoma evacuation. Treatment methods and choice of surgical technique are debated, and so far, no clear advantage of endoscopic surgery (ES) over conventional craniotomy (CC) or BMT was shown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the differences in outcome, morbidity, and mortality between ES and CC or BMT.

Methods

We systematically searched Embase and PubMed databases for randomised controlled trials comparing ES to CC or BMT. The primary outcome was favourable functional outcome after 6 months. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality rates and duration of surgery.

Results

Seven articles were eligible for the outcome analysis with 312 subjects in the control (216 CC, 96 BMT) and 279 in the treatment group (ES). Compared to BMT, ES showed significantly improved favourable functional outcome (RR 1.93 [1.12; 3.33], p = 0.02) and mortality rates (RR 0.63 [0.44; 0.90], p = 0.01). No significant difference in favourable functional outcome and mortality was seen in ES compared to CC (RR 2.13 [0.01; 737], p = 0.35; RR 0.42 [0.17; 1.05], p = 0.06). ES showed significantly lower morbidity (RR 0.41 [0.29; 0.58], p < 0.01), and overall infection rates (RR 0.33 [0.20; 0.54], p < 0.01) compared to CC. Duration of surgery was significantly shorter for ES compared to CC (SMD -3.17 [-4.35; -2.00], p < 0.01).

Conclusion

ES showed significantly improved favourable functional outcome and mortality rates compared to BMT while showing reduced length of surgery and lower complication rates compared to CC. Therefore, ES appears a promising approach for treatment of SSICH justifying further prospective trials.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020181018.

Recent Updates in Neurosurgical Interventions for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Minimally Invasive Surgery to Improve Surgical Performance

The efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have long been subjects of investigation and debate. The recent results of the minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) III trial demonstrated the safety of the procedure and a reduction in mortality compared to medical treatment. Although no improvement in functional outcomes was shown, the trial elucidated that benefits of intervention depend on surgical performance: a greater ICH reduction, defined as ≤ 15 mL end of treatment ICH volume or ≥70% volume reduction, correlated with significant functional improvement. Recent meta-analyses suggested the benefits of neurosurgical hematoma evacuation, especially when performed earlier and done using minimally invasive procedures. In MISTIE III, to confirm hemostasis and reduce the risk of rebleeding, the mean time from onset to surgery and treatment completion took 47 and 123 h, respectively. Theoretically, the earlier the hematoma is removed, the better the outcome. Therefore, a higher rate of hematoma reduction within an earlier time course may be beneficial. Neuroendoscopic surgery enables less invasive removal of ICH under direct visualization. Minimally invasive procedures have continued to evolve with the support of advanced guidance systems and devices in favor of better surgical performance. Ongoing randomized controlled trials utilizing emerging minimally invasive techniques, such as the Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intra Cerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH) trial, Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgical Treatment with Apollo/Artemis in Patients with Brain Hemorrhage (INVEST) trial, and the Dutch Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery Trial (DIST), may provide significant information on the optimal treatment for ICH.

Effects of mild hypothermia therapy combined with minimally invasive debridement in patients with hypertensive intracranial hemorrhage: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of mild hypothermia therapy (MHT) combined with minimally invasive debridement (MID) in patients with severe hypertensive intracranial hemorrhage (HICH).

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with severe HICH who received clinical intervention in our hospital were enrolled as study subjects. In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, they were divided into a study group (SG, n=70) and a control group (CNG, n=50). The CNG was treated with MID, and the SG was treated with MID combined with MHT. The general surgical indices, short-term postoperative outcomes, postoperative neurological and recovery in activities of daily living, and complications were compared between the two groups. Patients' Glasgow prognosis (Glasgow Outcome Scale, GOS) scores at 1 year after surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

The operative time, intraoperative blood loss and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were shorter/lower in the SG than in the CNG (P<0.05). The SG had higher hematoma clearance rate at 1 d and 3 d postoperatively, and lower residual hematoma volume at 3 d and 7 d postoperatively than the CNG (P<0.05). Patients in the SG had higher Barthel scores and lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores than the CNG at 1-12 months after intervention (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the SG was lower than that in the CNG (P<0.05). The percentage of GOS grade IV and V was significantly higher in the SG than in the CNG 1 year after surgery (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of MID and MHT in patients with severe HICH has better clinical results in the short and long term, and improves the postoperative outcomes and quality of life. It can also reduce the incidence of perioperative complications.

Application of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical significance of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Patients with hypertensive ICH who required to undergo surgical treatment were assigned into treatment group (126 cases), who were assisted by intraoperative ultrasound, and control group (122 cases), who were not assisted by intraoperative ultrasound. In the treatment group, intraoperative ultrasound was used for real-time positioning after opening the bone flap, so as to guide the surgery. After surgery, conventional treatment and follow-up were conducted, and the statistical analysis was eventually performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean rate of hematoma clearance was (95.20 ± 5.18)% in the treatment group and (86.20 ± 4.85)% in the control group (P<0.05); the average time required for intraoperative hematoma clearance was 44.5±3.2 min in the treatment group and 66.3±5.1 min in the control group (P < 0.05). Finally, the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of therapeutic efficacy and overall prognosis (P = 0.03 and 0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ultrasound possessed the features of precise positioning, real-time guidance, and being user-friendly, which can shorten the operation time, increase the efficacy of surgery, and improve patients' overall prognosis, highlighting high clinical significance of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery.

Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Techniques: A Review

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) continues to have high morbidity and mortality. Improving ICH outcomes likely requires rapid removal of blood from the parenchyma and restraining edema formation while also limiting further neuronal damage due to the surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches promise to provide these benefits and have become alluring options for management of ICH. This review describes six MIS techniques for ICH evacuation including craniopuncture, stereotactic aspiration with thrombolysis, endoport-mediated evacuation, endoscope-assisted evacuation, adjunctive aspiration devices, and the surgiscope. The efficacy of each modality is discussed based on current literature. The largest clinical trials have yet to demonstrate definitive effects of MIS intervention on mortality and functional outcomes for ICH. Thus, there is a significant need for further innovation for ICH treatment. Multiple ongoing trials promise to better clarify the potential of the newer, non-thrombolytic MIS techniques.

Efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol of randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is the most serious complication of hypertension. Clearing intracranial hematoma as soon as possible, reducing brain cell edema, and controlling intracranial pressure could effectively reduce neuron damage, lower patient mortality, and improve patient prognosis. At present, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely used and plays an important role in the treatment of HICH. However, it is still in controversies about the choice of surgical treatment and medication treatment for HICH. Therefore, we try to conduct a randomized, controlled, prospective trial to observe the efficacy of MIS treatment against HICH compared with medication treatment.

METHODS

Patients will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group in a 1:1 ratio using the random number generator in Microsoft Excel. Stereotactic soft channel minimally invasive intracranial hematoma puncture and drainage treatment and medication treatment will be applied respectively. The outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage volume, Glasgow coma scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale will be recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the study will be helpful for the choice of MIS and conservative treatment when treating HICH patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/ME6Y5.

Surgical strategy for patients with supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: minimally invasive surgery and conventional surgery

Objective

The role of surgery in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to conventional surgery (CS) for supratentorial sICH.

Methods

The medical data of 70 patients with surgically treated supratentorial sICH were retrospectively reviewed. MIS was performed in 35 patients, and CS was performed in 35 patients. The surgical technique was selected based on the neurological status and radiological findings, such as hematoma volume, neurological status and spot signs on computed tomographic angiography. Treatment outcomes, prognostic factors and the usefulness of the spot sign were analyzed.

Results

Clinical states in both groups were statistically similar, preoperatively, and in 1 and 3 months after surgery. Both groups showed significant progressive improvement till 3 months after surgery. Better preoperative neurological status, more hematoma removal and intensive care unit (ICU) stay ≤7 days were the significant prognostic factors for favorable 3-month clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10–0.96, p=0.04; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.08, p=0.02; OR 26.31, 95% CI 2.46–280.95, p=0.01, respectively). Initial hematoma volume and MIS were significant prognostic factors for a short ICU stay (≤7 days; OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91–0.99; p=0.01; OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.03–14.82, p=0.045, respectively). No patients in the MIS group experienced hematoma expansion before surgery or postoperative rebleeding.

Conclusions

MIS was not inferior to CS in terms of clinical outcomes. The spot sign seems to be an effective radiological marker for predicting hematoma expansion and determining the surgical technique.

Endoscopic hematoma removal of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage under local anesthesia reduces operative time compared to craniotomy

The surgical efficacy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unknown. We compared the advantages of the widely practiced endoscopic hematoma removal under local anesthesia with that of craniotomy under general anesthesia for ICH. We also focused on our novel operative concept of intentional hematoma leaving technique to avoid further damage to the brain. We retrospectively analyzed 134 consecutive patients (66 endoscopies and 68 craniotomies) who were surgically treated for supratentorial ICH. The characteristics of the 134 patients were as follows: The median (interquartile range) age was 73 (61-82) years. The median Glasgow Coma Scale scores at admission, on day 7, and the median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months were 10 (7-13), 13 (10-14), and 4 (3-5) respectively. The statistical comparison revealed there were no differences in GCS score on day seven between the endoscopy 13 (12-14) and craniotomy group 12 (9-14). No differences were observed in mRS scores at 6 months between the endoscopy 4 (2-5) and craniotomy group 4 (3-5). However, the patients treated with our technique tended to have favorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed the operative time was significantly decreased in the endoscopy group compared to the craniotomy group (p < 0.001).