1
|
Cui W, Liu X, Zhao Z, Feng Z, Meng X. Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:365. [PMID: 38902785 PMCID: PMC11188284 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04848-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND The complexity of human anatomical structures and the variability of vertebral body structures in patients with scoliosis pose challenges in pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction surgery. Through technological advancements, robots have been introduced in spinal surgery to assist with pedicle screw placement. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and CNKI databases and comparative studies assessing the accuracy and postoperative efficacy of pedicle screw placement using robotic assistance or freehand techniques in patients with scoliosis were included. The analysis evaluated the accuracy of screw placement, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS Seven studies comprising 584 patients were included in the meta-analysis, with 282 patients (48.3%) in the robot-assisted group and 320 (51.7%) in the freehand group. Robot-assisted placement showed significantly better clinically acceptable screw placement results compared with freehand placement (odds ratio [OR]: 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-3.91, P < 0.0001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in achieving "perfect" screw placement between the two groups (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.95-2.46, P = 0.08). The robot-assisted group had longer operation durations (mean deviation [MD]: 43.64, 95% CI: 22.25-64.74, P < 0.0001) but shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD: - 1.12, 95% CI: - 2.15 to - 0.08, P = 0.03) than the freehand group. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. There was no significant difference in Cobb Angle between the two groups before and after operation. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement offers higher accuracy and shorter hospital stay than freehand placement in scoliosis surgery; although the robotics approach is associated with longer operative durations, similar complication rates and intraoperative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Cui
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Xinglin Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Zhiheng Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Zihe Feng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, S Sanlitun Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Xianglong Meng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Naseem AO, Al-Muhannadi A, Ramadhan M, Alfadhli A, Marwan Y, Shafafy R, Abd-El-Barr MM. Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion versus navigation-based and freehand techniques for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform 2024:10.1007/s43390-024-00879-y. [PMID: 38619784 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00879-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of robotics in spine surgery remains controversial, especially for scoliosis correction surgery. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted (RA) surgery specifically for scoliosis surgery by comparing RA to both navigation systems (NS) and conventional freehand techniques (CF). METHODS As per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted via an electronic search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All papers comparing RA to either NS or CF for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis were included. Fixed and random effects models of analysis were utilised based on analysis heterogeneity. RESULTS 10 observational studies were included in total. RA had significantly greater odds of accurate pedicle screw placement relative to both NS (OR = 2.02, CI = 1.52-2.67, p < 0.00001) and CF (OR = 3.06, CI = 1.79-5.23, p < 0.00001). The downside of RA was the significantly greater operation duration relative to NS (MD = 10.74, CI = 3.52-17.97, p = 0.004) and CF (MD = 40.27, CI = 20.90, p < 0.0001). Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss, radiation exposure, length of hospital stay, cobb angle correction rate, postoperative SRS score, VAS pain score, JOA score, as well as rates of neurological injury and revision surgery, were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION RA offers significantly greater pedicle screw placement accuracy relative to NS and CF, however, surgery can take longer. In terms of perioperative outcomes, all three techniques are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yousef Marwan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
| | - Roozbeh Shafafy
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Stanmore, UK.
| | - Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Li HX, Zhu QS, Zhu YH. Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:108. [PMID: 38456994 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw implantation in scoliosis surgery. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023471837). Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The outcomes included operation time, pedicle screw implantation time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopic, accuracy of pedicle screw position, hospital stays, postoperative hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Scoliosis Research Society-22(SRS-22), cobb angle, cobb angle correction rate, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and complications. Eight papers involving 473 patients met all the criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the reduction in operation time. The effect of reducing the pedicle screw implantation time in the RA group was significant (WMD = -1.28; 95% CI: -1.76 to -0.80; P < 0.00001). The effect of reducing the blood loss in the RA group was significant (WMD=-105.57; 95% CI: -206.84 to -4.31; P = 0.04). The effect of reducing the number of fluoroscopic in the RA group was significant (WMD=-5.93; 95% CI: -8.24 to -3.62; P < ). The pedicle screw position of Grade A was significantly more in the RA group according to both the Gertzbein-Robbins scale and the Rampersaud scale. Compared with the FA group, the difference in the hospital stays in the RA group was not statistically significant, but the effect of reducing the postoperative hospital stays in the RA group was significant (WMD = -2.88; 95% CI: -4.13 to -1.63; P < 0.00001). The difference in the VAS, JOA, SRS-22, Cobb angle and Cobb angle correction rate, SVA, and complications between the two groups was not statistically significant. The robot-assisted technique achieved statistically significant results in terms of pedicle screw placement time, blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, accuracy of pedicle screw position, and postoperative hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No.126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hao-Xuan Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No.126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Qing-San Zhu
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No.126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yu-Hang Zhu
- Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No.126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin Y, Rao S, Liu B, Sun Y, Zhao S, Su G, Chen S, Li Y, Chen B. Percutaneous full endoscopic C1 laminectomy for developmental atlantal stenosis with myelopathy: a case report of three cases and review of the literature. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2022; 10:720. [PMID: 35845524 PMCID: PMC9279768 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-2282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Developmental atlantal stenosis with myelopathy (DASM) in adults is a rare disease that only sporadic cases have been reported over the years. C1 laminectomy (C1L) is one of the most common operations for its treatment. However, as an open surgery, it has shortcomings such as large trauma and slow postoperative rehabilitation, and minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) offers alternative treatment options with advantages. MISS instruments expand the technical capabilities of surgeons, which allows safer and more effective therapeutics for difficult and complicated diseases. This case report presents a new minimally invasive approach; percutaneous full endoscopic C1 laminectomy (PFEC1L), for the treatment of DASM, and to consolidate the current literature on the condition to summarize its etiologies, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, surgical management, and prognoses. Case Description The patient in Case 1 presented with neck pain and numbness and weakness in the limbs. The patient in Case 2 presented with numbness in the extremities and the patient in Case 3 presented with bilateral hand numbness and left lower limb weakness. They were all diagnosed with DASM and underwent PFEC1L treatment to maintain the enlargement and decompression of the atlantal canal, which achieved favorable outcomes without complications during the postoperative follow-up visit. Conclusions DASM is rare but potentially dangerous. Its diagnosis is made based on clinical manifestations combined with radiological imaging examinations, especially computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While C1L is the most common surgical method, PFEC1L is a new feasible and safe therapeutic option with comparable good outcomes and the advantage of being minimally-invasive. To our knowledge this is the first report that PFEC1L was applied for DASM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongpeng Lin
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Siyuan Rao
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bingxin Liu
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yueli Sun
- Spine Disease Institute, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guoyi Su
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shudong Chen
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjin Li
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bolai Chen
- Division of Spine Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|