Plantar Pressure and Gait Symmetry in Individuals with Fractures versus Tendon Injuries to the Hindfoot

Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are widely used for measurement of functional outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, PROMs rely on patient collaboration and suffer from various types of bias. Wearable Activity Monitors (WAMs) are increasingly used to objectify functional assessment. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify and characterise the WAMs technology and metrics currently used for orthopaedic trauma research.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase biomedical literature search engines were queried. Eligibility criteria included: Human clinical studies published in the English language between 2010 and 2019 involving fracture management and WAMs. Variables collected from each article included: Technology used, vendor/product, WAM body location, metrics measured, measurement time period, year of publication, study geographic location, phase of treatment studied, fractures studied, number of patients studied, sex and age of the study subjects, and study level of evidence. Six investigators reviewed the resulting papers. Descriptive statistics of variables of interest were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six papers were available for analysis, showing an increasing trend of publications per year. Accelerometry followed by plantar pressure insoles were the most commonly employed technologies. The most common location for WAM placement was insoles, followed by the waist. The most commonly studied fracture type was hip fractures followed by fragility fractures in general, ankle, "lower extremity", and tibial fractures. The rehabilitation phase following surgery was the most commonly studied period. Sleep duration, activity time or step counts were the most commonly reported WAM metrics. A preferred, clinically validated WAM metric was not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

WAMs have an increasing presence in the orthopaedic trauma literature. The optimal implementation of this technology and its use to understand patients' pre-injury and post-injury functions is currently insufficiently explored and represents an area that will benefit from future study.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO ID:210344.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00629-0.

Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures

Background

Extensile lateral approach had been recognized as the gold standard technique for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) while sinus tarsi approach had been increasingly valued by surgeons and comparative clinical outcome was shown in both techniques. Appropriate decisions could be made by the clinicians with the help of cost-utility analysis (CUA) about optimal healthcare for type II/III calcaneus fracture.

Method

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in which basic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and health care costs of 109 patients had been obtained and analyzed. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, validated by EuroQol five-dimensional-three levels (EQ-5D-3L), were used to enumerate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost per QALY.

Results

One hundred nine patients were enrolled in our study including 62 in the ELA group and 47 in the STA group. There were no significant differences between these two groups in mean total cost, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation expense, surgery, anesthesia, and antibiotic expense. The expense of internal fixation materials ($3289.0 ± 543.9) versus ($2630.6 ± 763.7) and analgesia ($145.8 ± 85.6) versus ($102.9 ± 62.7) in ELA group were significantly higher than in the STA group (P < .001, P = .008, respectively). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores showed significant difference at postoperative 3 and 5 days (P < .001). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores and the Bohlers’ and Gissane angle showed no significant differences between the two groups before and after the operation. The cost-effectiveness ratios of ELA and STA were $8766.8 ± 2835.2/QALY and $7914.9 ± 1822.0/QALY respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) of ELA over STA was $32110.00/QALY, but both showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Both ELA and STA techniques are effective operative procedures for the patients with calcaneus fracture. Moreover, STA seems to be more reasonable for its merits including less postoperative pain, and less expense of analgesia as well as internal fixation materials.

Level of evidence

5

What is the added value of pedobarography for assessing functional outcome of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures? A systematic review of existing literature

BACKGROUND

Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures often result in permanent disability, reduced quality of life and high socio-economic costs. Since they often result in a change in geometry of the foot, pedobarography may be useful in predicting outcome at an early stage. The aim of this study was to examine whether a correlation exists between pedobarography and functional outcomes in patients with a displaced intra-articular fracture.

METHODS

In this systematic review, studies were included when they investigated the correlation between pedobarography and functional outcome in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Excluded were studies on <10 patients or on animals/cadavers. Collected were baseline patient/treatment characteristics, pedobarographic data (peak pressures, maximum force and centre of pressure) and functional outcome scores.

FINDINGS

Out of 153 abstracts, 40 remained for full text screening and 9 were included. Pedobarographic measurements (pressure plate or insoles) showed a lateralization of centre of pressure, decreased pressures underneath the hindfoot, first and second toe and increased pressure underneath the midfoot and forefoot. Correlations with functional outcome were found in some combined pedobarographic results (entire foot/multiple measurements), but hardly in pressures underneath specific foot areas.

INTERPRETATION

Even though increased or decreased pressures in specific areas of the foot may not be directly related to functional outcome, combined scores often did. For pedobarography to serve as a prediction tool, it should be more standardised. However, assessing centre of pressure and altered peak pressures underneath the foot, may be useful in developing customized aids such as insoles, aiming for a more individualized improvement.