The CDK Pef1 and protein phosphatase 4 oppose each other for regulating cohesin binding to fission yeast chromosomes

Phosphate uptake restriction, phosphate export, and polyphosphate synthesis contribute synergistically to cellular proliferation and survival

Phosphate (Pi) is a macronutrient, and Pi homeostasis is essential for life. Pi homeostasis has been intensively studied; however, many questions remain, even at the cellular level. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we sought to better understand cellular Pi homeostasis and showed that three Pi regulators with SPX domains, Xpr1/Spx2, Pqr1, and the VTC complex synergistically contribute to Pi homeostasis to support cell proliferation and survival. SPX domains bind to inositol pyrophosphate and modulate activities of Pi-related proteins. Xpr1 is a plasma membrane protein and its Pi-exporting activity has been demonstrated in metazoan orthologs, but not in fungi. We first found that S. pombe Xpr1 is a Pi exporter, activity of which is regulated and accelerated in the mutants of Pqr1 and the VTC complex. Pqr1 is the ubiquitin ligase downregulating the Pi importers, Pho84 and Pho842. The VTC complex synthesizes polyphosphate in vacuoles. Triple deletion of Xpr1, Pqr1, and Vtc4, the catalytic core of the VTC complex, was nearly lethal in normal medium but survivable at lower [Pi]. All double-deletion mutants of the three genes were viable at normal Pi, but Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed severe viability loss at high [Pi], accompanied by hyper-elevation of cellular total Pi and free Pi. This study suggests that the three cellular processes, restriction of Pi uptake, Pi export, and polyP synthesis, contribute synergistically to cell proliferation through maintenance of Pi homeostasis, leading to the hypothesis that cooperation between Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex protects the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus from lethal elevation of free Pi.

Cyclin-dependent kinases: Masters of the eukaryotic universe

A family of structurally related cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs) drives many aspects of eukaryotic cell function. Much of the literature in this area has considered individual members of this family to act primarily either as regulators of the cell cycle, the context in which CDKs were first discovered, or as regulators of transcription. Until recently, CDK7 was the only clear example of a CDK that functions in both processes. However, new data points to several "cell-cycle" CDKs having important roles in transcription and some "transcriptional" CDKs having cell cycle-related targets. For example, novel functions in transcription have been demonstrated for the archetypal cell cycle regulator CDK1. The increasing evidence of the overlap between these two CDK types suggests that they might play a critical role in coordinating the two processes. Here we review the canonical functions of cell-cycle and transcriptional CDKs, and provide an update on how these kinases collaborate to perform important cellular functions. We also provide a brief overview of how dysregulation of CDKs contributes to carcinogenesis, and possible treatment avenues. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes RNA Processing > 3' End Processing RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing.

Modulation of DNA methylation and protein expression in the prefrontal cortex by repeated administration of D-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): Impact on neurotropic, neurotrophic, and neuroplasticity signaling

AIM

Psychedelic compounds elicit relief from mental disorders. However, the underpinnings of therapeutic improvement remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the effects of repeated lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on whole-genome DNA methylation and protein expression in the mouse prefrontal cortex (PFC).

METHODS

Whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) and proteomics profiling of the mouse prefrontal cortex (PFC) were performed to assess DNA methylation and protein expression changes following 7 days of repeated LSD administration (30 μg/kg/day); a treatment we previously found to potentiate excitatory neurotransmission and to increase dendritic spine density in the PFC in mice. qRT-PCR was employed to validate candidate genes detected in both analyses.

RESULTS

LSD significantly modulated DNA methylation in 635 CpG sites of the mouse PFC, and in an independent cohort the expression level of 178 proteins. Gene signaling pathways affected are involved in nervous system development, axon guidance, synaptic plasticity, quantity and cell viability of neurons and protein translation. Four genes and their protein product were detected as differentially methylated and expressed, and their transcription was increased. Specifically, Coronin 7 (Coro7), an axon guidance cue; Penta-EF-Hand Domain Containing 1 (Pef1), an mTORC1 and cell cycle modulator; Ribosomal Protein S24 (Rps24), required for pre-rRNA maturation and biogenesis of proteins involved with cell proliferation and migration, and Abhydrolase Domain Containing 6, Acylglycerol Lipase (Abhd6), a post-synaptic lipase.

CONCLUSIONS

LSD affects DNA methylation, altering gene expression and protein expression related to neurotropic-, neurotrophic- and neuroplasticity signaling. This could represent a core mechanism mediating the effects of psychedelics.