A neural progenitor mitotic wave is required for asynchronous axon outgrowth and morphology

Scabrous is distributed via signaling filopodia to modulate Notch response during bristle patterning in Drosophila

During development, cells in tissues must be patterned correctly in order to support tissue function and shape. The sensory bristles of the peripheral nervous system on the thorax of Drosophila melanogaster self-organizes from a unpatterned epithelial tissue to a regular spot pattern during pupal stages. Wild type patterning requires Notch-mediated lateral inhibition. Scabrous is a protein that can bind to and modify Notch receptor activity. Scabrous can be secreted, but it is also known to be localized to basal signaling filopodia, or cytonemes, that play a role in long-range Notch signaling. Here we show that Scabrous is primarily distributed basally, within the range of signaling filopodia extension. We show that filamentous actin dynamics are required for the distribution of Scabrous protein during sensory bristle patterning stages. We show that the Notch response of epithelial cells is sensitive to the level of Scabrous protein being expressed by the sensory bristle precursor cell. Our findings at the cell-level suggest a model for how epithelial cells engaged in lateral inhibition at a distance are sensitive local levels of Scabrous protein.

Modeling early germline immunization after horizontal transfer of transposable elements reveals internal piRNA cluster heterogeneity

BACKGROUND

A fraction of all genomes is composed of transposable elements (TEs) whose mobility needs to be carefully controlled. In gonads, TE activity is repressed by PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), a class of small RNAs synthesized by heterochromatic loci enriched in TE fragments, called piRNA clusters. Maintenance of active piRNA clusters across generations is secured by maternal piRNA inheritance providing the memory for TE repression. On rare occasions, genomes encounter horizontal transfer (HT) of new TEs with no piRNA targeting them, threatening the host genome integrity. Naïve genomes can eventually start to produce new piRNAs against these genomic invaders, but the timing of their emergence remains elusive.

RESULTS

Using a set of TE-derived transgenes inserted in different germline piRNA clusters and functional assays, we have modeled a TE HT in Drosophila melanogaster. We have found that the complete co-option of these transgenes by a germline piRNA cluster can occur within four generations associated with the production of new piRNAs all along the transgenes and the germline silencing of piRNA sensors. Synthesis of new transgenic TE piRNAs is linked to piRNA cluster transcription dependent on Moonshiner and heterochromatin mark deposition that propagates more efficiently on short sequences. Moreover, we found that sequences located within piRNA clusters can have different piRNA profiles and can influence transcript accumulation of nearby sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that genetic and epigenetic properties, such as transcription, piRNA profiles, heterochromatin, and conversion efficiency along piRNA clusters, could be heterogeneous depending on the sequences that compose them. These findings suggest that the capacity of transcriptional signal erasure induced by the chromatin complex specific of the piRNA cluster can be incomplete through the piRNA cluster loci. Finally, these results have revealed an unexpected level of complexity that highlights a new magnitude of piRNA cluster plasticity fundamental for the maintenance of genome integrity.