Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study

The dynamics of recovery of external breathing function in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the acute period under the influence of the rehabilitation program

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To determine the dynamics of renewal of the function of external respiration in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the acute stage of rehabilitation under the influence of a rehabilitation program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: The study is randomized, simple with blinded assessors. The forced vital capacity (FVC, l), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1, l) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, l/s) were assessed. Spirometry was performed 120 patients on the first day of admission of patients to the surgical department for surgical intervention, on the second day and on the day of discharge. Methods of mathematical statistics: arithmetic mean (M) and standard error of the mean (}m), Student's t-test were calculated, differences at p<0,05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Results: It has been established that laparoscopic cholecystectomy leads to a statistically significant decrease in the parameters of respiratory function in all age categories. More pronounced positive dynamics of respiratory function in the group of respiratory therapy. It was established that without respiratory therapy on the day of discharge there was no restoration (р<0.05) in groups of elderly patients of group of FVC l, FEV1 l, PEFR l/s; in middle-aged patients did no restoration FEV1, l, PEFR, l/s; in younger patients there was no recovery of FEV1, l.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: The results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the introduction of diaphragmatic breathing exercises in combination with early mobilization at the acute and subacute stages of rehabilitation in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in order to restore the function of the respiratory system.

Predictive Factors for Drain Placement After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Purpose

Currently, surgical drainage during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still placed in selected patients. Evidence of the non-beneficial effect of the surgical drain comes from studies with a heterogeneous population. This preliminary study aims to identify any clinical, demographic, or intraoperative predictive factors for a surgical drain placement during LC as the first step to identify population for a prospective randomized study.

Method

The study was conducted in a single referral center and academic hospital between 2014 and 2018. Patients who underwent unconverted LC were divided into two groups: Group A (drain) and Group B (no drain). We explored baseline, preoperative, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Between 409 patients who underwent LC: 90 (22%) patients were in Group A (drain). Age &gt;64 years, male sex, cholecystitis, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1, experienced surgeon, intraoperative technical difficulties, need for an additional trocar, operative time &gt;60 min, and estimated blood loss &gt;10 ml were predictive factors at univariate analysis. While at multivariate analysis, cholecystitis (odds ratio [OR]: 2.8, 95% CI:1.5–5.1; p &lt; 0.001), CCI ≥ 1 (OR:1.9, 95% CI:1.0–3.5; p = 0.05), intraoperative technical difficulties (OR: 3.6, 95% CI:1.8–6.2; p &lt; 0.001), need of an additional trocar (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4–4.4; p &lt; 0.005), and estimated blood loss &gt;10 ml (OR: 3.0, 95% CI:1.7–5.3; p &lt; 0.0001) were predictive factors for a surgical drain placement during LC.

Conclusions

This study identified predictive factors that currently drive the surgeons to a surgical drain placement after LC. Randomized prospective studies are needed to define the use of drain placement in these selected patients.

The Value of Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild or Moderate Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Although the preoperative management of mild and moderate (Grade I-II) acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) has been standardized, there is no consensus on the value of abdominal drainage after early cholecystectomy.

METHODS

In a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT01015417) focused on the value of postoperative antibiotic therapy in patients with ACC, we determined the value of abdominal drainage in patients having undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for Grades I-II ACC. All postoperative complications were analyzed after using a propensity score. A post hoc test was used to assess the statistical robustness of our results.

RESULTS

Of the 414 enrolled patients, 178 did not have abdominal drainage (forming the no-drainage group) and 236 had drainage (the drainage group). After matching on PS, the deep incisional site infection was 1.1 versus 0.8 %, p = 0.78. This result is similar for the superficial incisional site infections; the distant infections; the overall morbidity, and the readmission rate. Only the hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the drainage group (3.3 vs. 5.1 days, p = 0.003). Neither abdominal drainage nor the absence of postoperative antibiotic therapy was found to be a risk factor for deep incisional site infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of abdominal drainage depends on the surgeon's personal preferences but is often used in high-risk populations. However, abdominal drainage does not appear to be of any benefit (in terms of postoperative outcomes) and may even compromise recovery in patients having undergone early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild or moderate ACC.