Impact of adalimumab on clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and sick leave in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an observational study from five Central and Eastern European countries

An Overview of Adalimumab Therapy for Ankylosing Spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease known for causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility in the axial skeleton. Adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for AS.

METHODS

This systematic review involved a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials related to AS treatment, conducted in major databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed. The search terms encompassed ankylosing spondylitis, adalimumab, methotrexate, other non-biologic DMARDs, glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and analgesics. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 4,500 participants were included in the review.

RESULTS

The review's results revealed that adalimumab demonstrated notable superiority when compared to a placebo. It effectively reduced disease activity, improved physical function, and lowered inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Adalimumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with adverse events comparable to those observed with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, adalimumab is deemed an effective treatment for AS, showcasing its potential as a first-line therapeutic option. Notably, no significant increase in adverse events was observed compared to placebo. However, the conclusion emphasizes the need for further studies with extended follow-up durations to ascertain the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in AS management. This systematic review provides valuable insights supporting the use of adalimumab in the treatment of AS and underscores the importance of ongoing investigations into its long-term effects to optimize its clinical utilization in AS patients.

Clinical and Economic Benefit of Achieving Disease Control in Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Retrospective Analysis from the OM1 Registry

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the clinical and economic benefit of achieving disease control in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), thus we aimed to assess the impact of disease control on healthcare resource use (HCRU) and direct medical costs among US patients with PsA or AS over 1 year.

METHODS

Data were derived from the US OM1 PsA/AS registries (PsA: 1/2013-12/2020; AS: 01/2013-4/2021) and the Optum Insight Clinformatics® Data Mart to identify adult patients with PsA or AS. Two cohorts were created: with disease control and without disease control. Disease control was defined as modified Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) ≤ 4 for PsA and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) < 4 for AS. Outcomes were all-cause inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) visits and associated costs over a 1-year follow-up period. Mean costs per person per year (PPPY) were assessed descriptively and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the likelihood of HCRU by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 1235 PsA (with disease control: N = 217; without: N = 1018) and 581 AS patients (with disease control: N = 342; without: N = 239). Patients without disease control were more likely to have an inpatient (aOR [95% CI]; PsA: 3.0 [0.9, 10.1]; AS: 7.7 [2.3, 25.1]) or ED (PsA: 1.6 [0.6, 4.2]; AS: 3.5 [1.5, 8.3]) visit than those with disease control. Those without disease control, vs. those with disease control, had greater PPPY costs associated with inpatient (PsA: $1550 vs. $443), outpatient (PsA: $1789 vs. $1327; AS: $2498 vs. $2023), and ED (PsA: $114 vs. $57; AS: $316 vs. $50) visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study demonstrate lower disease activity among patients with PsA and AS is associated with less HCRU and lower costs over the following year.

The Association Between TNF Inhibitor Therapy Availability and Hospital Admission Rates for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. A Longitudinal Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

TNF inhibiting drugs (TNFi) provide symptomatic relief for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but uncertainty remains about long-term benefits. We compared hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, and direct health care costs before and after the availability of subsidized TNFi therapy for AS patients.

METHODS

State-specific dispensing and cost data for TNFi therapy for AS in Western Australia (WA) were obtained from Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and expressed as the number of defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 population/day. Linked admission and ED data for 1783 AS patients followed for 14,257 person-years between 1990 and 2015 were extracted. Pre- and post-2005 admission rates/100,000 population were compared by rate ratio (RR).

RESULTS

TNFi uptake in WA reached a DDD/1000 population/day 0.45 at an annual cost of AU$17.7 million in 2020. Hospital admission rates remained unchanged (RR: 0.95, CI 0.71-1.27, p = 0.66) but increased slightly in female patients (RR 1.22; CI 0.91-1.64, p = 0.20). While there was no change in cardiovascular admissions (6.3 vs. 6.2%, p = 0.6) or ED visit rates since 2005, frequency for cancer (2.7 vs. 3.8%, p < 0.01), infection (1.1 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01) and mental health (4.0 vs. 4.5%, p < 0.02) admissions increased. Associated direct health care costs (2020 values) averaged AU$14.7 million before and AU$ 24.7 million per year after 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of subsidized TNFi therapy did not change all-cause hospital admission or ED visit rates for existing AS patients. Whether the significantly increased direct health care costs are offset by reductions in other health care costs remains to be determined.

Investigating diagnosis, treatment, and burden of disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Central Eastern Europe and the United States: a real-world study

Introduction/Objectives

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated condition. We compared AS diagnosis, treatment, and burden in Central Eastern European countries (CEE), where this has been less researched, and the United States (US) from a real-world perspective.

Methods

Point-in-time survey of rheumatologists and their AS patients was conducted in the US (Apr–Oct 2018) and CEE (Aug–Nov 2019) via physician- and patient-completed record forms, including clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, t-tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and generalized linear models.

Results

In total, 487 patients were recruited from 88 rheumatologists in the US and 922 patients from 126 rheumatologists in CEE. Time from onset of symptoms to final AS diagnosis was longer in CEE than the US (4.2 vs 2.7 years, p < 0.05). At diagnosis, a greater use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and injected steroids was reported in CEE vs the US (43.7% vs 27.6%, p < 0.05; 19.3% vs 8.7%, p < 0.05). 22.9% of US patients received a biologic DMARD at diagnosis vs 10% of CEE patients (p < 0.05). At current consultation, biologic DMARD use in CEE was lower vs the US (27.9% vs 71.0%, p < 0.05). CEE vs US patients had greater disease activity (mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 4.2 vs 3.1, p < 0.05) and worse quality of life (QoL; mean Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire score 6.2 vs 8.4, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

AS patients in CEE vs the US faced slower diagnosis and worse access to biologics, disease activity, and QoL. Whether early access to biologics can improve symptoms, QoL, and daily activities in AS patients in CEE remains to be seen.

Key Points • The study provided evidence on the real-world approach to the diagnosis, treatment, and burden of axSpA (axial spondyloarthritis) in CEE compared with the US. • The study reported patients in CEE experienced longer delays in diagnosis and poorer access to biologics than in the US. • This may have resulted in higher disease activity, greater levels of pain, and poorer outcomes, as reported by patients with axSpA in CEE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-021-05864-8.

Cost of Illness, Quality of Life, and Work Outcomes in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Treated With Adalimumab in China

Objectives: To access the cost of illness, quality of life and work limitation in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients using adalimumab in China.

Methods: A prospective study was performed in 91 patients with active AS in China. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) fulfilled the 1984 New York modified criteria of AS with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥ 4 were enrolled. All participants received adalimumab (40 mg per 2 weeks) therapy and completed questionnaires about disease characteristics, quality of life and cost. Only patients with pay-work completed the Work Limitation Questionnaire and Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in AS. Factors associated with work outcomes were evaluated.

Results: A total of 91 patients with mean age of 30 years old (87.8% males) and mean disease duration of 10 years received adalimumab treatment for 24 weeks. The annual estimated cost of each patient was $37581.41 while the direct cost accounted for 84.6%. Seventy-eight percent of patients have a paid job with average work productivity loss of 0.28 measured by work limitation questionnaire, absenteeism and presenteeism were 10.22 and 43.86%, respectively, with a mean work productivity loss of 47.92% measured by Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire in AS. Patients experienced significantly greater improvements after adalimumab treatment in presenteeism, absenteeism, work productivity, and quality of life.

Conclusions: The cost of AS patients with adalimumab therapy was high in China. Disease activity, physical function, quality of life, and work outcomes improved significantly after therapy.

A case of advanced ankylosing spondylitis complicated with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of yellow ligament in which bone histomorphometry demonstrated delayed calcification

There is minimal information available about bone histomorphometric findings in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Herein, we report a case of advanced AS complicated with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of yellow ligament (OYL). A 37-year-old Japanese man who had been diagnosed with AS was administered adalimumab. Thirty-four months after adalimumab treatment, he reported upper extremity numbness, dexterity impairment and a spastic gait. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the cervical spine revealed cervical cord compression at the C5/6 level due to OYL. After surgery including posterior spinal fusion and cervical cord decompression with iliac bone graft at C5 and C6 arches, these symptoms improved. Bone histomorphometry of his ilium revealed marked osteoid formation and reduced mineral apposition, suggesting a calcification disorder. In addition, 25-hydroxy vitamin D was abnormally low (<4 ng/mL), and at 148 pg/mL parathyroid hormone was higher than the reference value, indicating secondary hyperparathyroidism. This case warrants reporting because OYL was complicated with AS and bone histomorphometric findings in AS were evaluated.