A retrospective study: does upper airway morphology differ between non-positional and positional obstructive sleep apnea?

Upper airway morphology in adults with positional obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

To compare the anatomical balance and shape of the upper airway in the supine position between adults with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) and adults with non-positional OSA (NPOSA).

METHODS

Adults diagnosed with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 10 events/h) were assessed for eligibility. POSA was defined as the supine AHI more than twice the AHI in non-supine positions; otherwise, patients were classified as NPOSA. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging was performed for every participant while awake in the supine position. The anatomical balance was calculated as the ratio of the tongue size to the maxillomandibular enclosure size. The upper airway shape was calculated as the ratio of the anteroposterior dimension to the lateral dimension at the location of the minimal cross-sectional area of the upper airway (CSAmin-shape).

RESULTS

Of 47 participants (28 males, median age [interquartile range] 56 [46 to 63] years, median AHI 27.8 [15.0 to 33.8]), 34 participants were classified as having POSA (72%). The POSA group tended to have a higher proportion of males and a lower AHI than the NPOSA group (P = 0.07 and 0.07, respectively). After controlling for both sex and AHI, the anatomical balance and CSAmin-shape were not significantly different between both groups (P = 0.18 and 0.73, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Adults with POSA and adults with NPOSA have similar anatomical balance and shape of their upper airway in the supine position.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Trial ACTRN12611000409976).

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Do Positional Patients Become Nonpositional Patients With Time?

OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with breathing abnormalities only or mainly in the supine posture are designated positional patients (PPs), whereas nonpositional patients (NPPs) have many breathing abnormalities in both lateral and supine postures. Positional therapy (PT), the avoidance of the supine posture during sleep, is the obvious treatment for PPs. The stability over time of being PP and leading factors that are involved in converting a PP to an NPP are addressed.

METHODS

We analyzed polysomnographic (PSG) recordings of 81 consecutive adult patients with OSA who were judged to be PPs at the first PSG evaluation, and their follow-up PSGs were obtained after an average period of 6.6 years.

RESULTS

The follow-up PSGs indicated that 57 PPs (70.4%) remained PPs, whereas 24 (29.6 %) converted to NPPs. Among PPs and NPPs, body mass index (P ≤ 0.05), overall Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI, P ≤ 0.087), and lateral AHI (P ≤ 0.046) increased and minimum SpO₂ during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (P ≤ 0.028) decreased significantly during the follow-up. However, among patients who became NPPs, the changes in these parameters were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more pronounced compared to the patients who remained PPs.

CONCLUSION

After an average of 6.6 years, 70.4% of PPs remained PPs. Therefore, if adherence for PT is good, they could continue to benefit from this therapy. For those who turned to NPPs, PT will not be the optimal treatment anymore; thus, these patients should be frequently monitored. Furthermore, an early treatment of PPs with PT would be highly beneficial to prevent worsening of their OSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 130:2263-2268, 2020.