Amorphous silica nanoparticles induce tumorigenesis via regulating ATP5H/SOD1-related oxidative stress, oxidative phosphorylation and EIF4G2/PABPC1-associated translational initiation

Research progress on the carcinogenicity of metal nanomaterials

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, new nanomaterials with enormous potentials continue to emerge, especially metal nanomaterials. Metal nanomaterials possess the characteristics of metals and nanomaterials, so they are widely used in many fields. But at the same time, whether the use or release of metal nan4omaterials into the environment is toxic to human beings and animals has now attained widespread attention at home and abroad. Currently, it is an indisputable fact that cancer ranks among the top causes of death among residents worldwide. The properties of causing DNA damage and mutations possessed by these metal nanomaterials make them unpredictable influences in the body, subsequently leading to genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Due to the increasing evidence of their roles in carcinogenicity, this article reviews the toxicological and carcinogenic effects of metal nanomaterials, including nano-metal elements (nickel nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, and cobalt nanoparticles) and nano-metal oxides (titanium dioxide nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles, and alumina nanoparticles). This article provides a reference for the researchers and policymakers to use metal nanomaterials rationally in modern industries and biomedicine.

Toxicologic Evaluation for Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles: Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Tumor-Promoting Potential

Amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiO₂NPs) have been widely used in medicine including targeted drug/DNA delivery, cancer therapy, and enzyme immobilization. Nevertheless, SiO₂NPs should be used with caution due to safety concerns associated with unique physical and chemical characteristics. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of SiO₂NPs on genotoxic and non-genotoxic mechanisms associated with abnormal gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in multistage carcinogenesis. The SiO₂NPs exhibited negative responses in standard genotoxicity tests including the Ames test, chromosome aberration assay, and micronucleus assay. In contrast, the SiO₂NPs significantly induced DNA breakage in comet assay. Meanwhile, SiO₂NPs inhibited GJIC based on the results of scrape/loading dye transfer assay for the identification of non-genotoxic tumor-promoting potential. The reduction in expression and plasma membrane localization of Cx43 was detected following SiO₂NP treatment. Particularly, SiO₂NP treatment increased Cx43 phosphorylation state, which was significantly attenuated by inhibitors of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) and threonine and tyrosine kinase (MEK), but not by protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor. Taken together, in addition to a significant increase in DNA breakage, SiO₂NP treatment resulted in GJIC dysregulation involved in Cx43 phosphorylation through the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Overall findings of the genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogenic potential of SiO₂NPs provide useful toxicological information for clinical application at an appropriate dose.