Candiduria in hospitalized patients: an investigation with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine analyzer

Predictive factors and prognostic value of candiduria in critically-ill patients with solid and hematological malignancies

PURPOSE

To investigate the epidemiology of candiduria in critically-ill patients with solid/hematological malignancies and to assess its predictive factors and prognostic value.

METHODS

All adult patients with confirmed solid/hematological malignancy admitted in the intensive care units (ICUs) for more than 48 h were retrospectively included. Urine cultures were sampled on admission and then whenever signs of sepsis were identified. Two groups were compared: (candiduria (+)) and (candiduria (-)).

RESULTS

One-hundred-seventy-three patients were included. Solid cancer was the underlying oncological disease for 147 patients (85%) while 26 patients (15%) had hematological malignancies. Twenty-nine patients (16.8%) were diagnosed with candiduria, and 31 urinary samples grew Candida spp. Candida spp represented 55.8% of the total urinary isolates. Fourteen isolates (45.2%) of Candida albicans were identified. Among the 17 non-albicans isolates, Candida tropicalis was the most predominant (41.9%). Six patients (3.5%) had candidemia with no significant difference between candiduria(+) and candiduria(-) groups (respectively, 6.9% and 2.8%; p = 0.264). In multivariate analysis, previous exposure to quinolones (OR = 3.8, CI95% [1.4-8.3]; p = 0.008), mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.1, CI95% [1.1-14.7]; p = 0.034) and renal replacement therapy (OR = 3.5, 95%CI [1.2-9.7]; p = 0.017) were identified as independent factors predicting candiduria. Candiduria was associated with significantly higher ICU-mortality after adjusting for SAPSII score on admission (OR = 2.9 CI95% [1.3-6.8]; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Candiduria is common in cancer critically-ill patients. We reported an increased rate of non-albicans species, over albicans species. Patients with candiduria had higher ICU mortality, probably related to higher frailty and clinical severity.

Evaluation of a Novel Laboratory Candiduria Screening Protocol in the Intensive Care Unit

Background

Since urine cultures are only guaranteed for patients with obvious urinary symptoms in most cases, most of candiduria episodes are ignored in clinic.

Objective

This study aimed to design a screening protocol to improve diagnostic efficiency of candiduria, and provide information of Candida species and drug susceptibility.

Methods

All patients, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital during December 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019, were enrolled in this study. Urinalysis was performed every three days for each subject from the first day of ICU admission. Urine specimens were sampled for fungal culture with either condition: (1) yeast-like cell counting (YLCC) ≥200; (2) positive YLCCs were observed in two consecutive tests, and at least one YLCC ≥100.

Results

The screening protocol dramatically improved the candiduria diagnostic rate of ICU patients from 2.28% to 17.27%. However, compared to the historical control, the screening protocol has no time-saving advantage in candiduria diagnosing. Higher percentage of C. albicans in screening protocol-identified candiduria patients was observed, although there was no statistical difference. Our results indicated that female gender, pneumonia, diabetes and infarction/hemorrhage patients were more prone to develop candiduria. Non-candiduria patients showed a better tendency for survival and shorter ICU stay length. Multisite colonization was common in the surveyed candiduria patients, who were up to 70.83% showed Candida positive cultures in sputum.

Conclusion

The screening protocol established in the study was a convenient and practical tool for early warning and feasible management of candiduria and IC.

A Rare Case of Urinary Tract Fungal Ball Leading to Fungemia and Bilateral Chorioretinitis

Background

Fungemia due to obstructive urinary tract fungal ball is exceedingly rare. These patients often have multiple predisposing conditions, including diabetes or antimicrobial exposure. While candiduria can be relatively common in this population, urinary tract fungal balls are a rare entity. Hospitalists should be aware of this rare complication in patients presenting with funguria. Case Presentation. We present a case of a 44-year-old male with type II diabetes, chronic hepatitis C secondary to injection drug use, and chronic kidney disease who developed a urinary tract fungal ball leading to fungemia and subsequent bilateral chorioretinitis, additionally complicated by emphysematous cystitis and pyelonephritis. Additional invasive treatment options beyond typical antifungals are often required in the case of urinary tract fungal ball, and in this case, bilateral nephrostomy tubes and micafungin were employed. Hospital course was complicated by C. tropicalis fungemia with subsequent bilateral fungal chorioretinitis on dilated fundus exam. This was effectively treated with cyclogyl and prednisolone drops along with bilateral voriconazole injections. Follow-up imaging and cultures showed resolution of fungemia, urinary tract masses, and chorioretinal infiltrates; however, recurrent polymicrobial UTIs continue to be an issue for this patient.

Conclusions

Special multidisciplinary management is required in the treatment of urinary tract fungal balls with subsequent fungemia, including nephrostomy tubes, antifungal irrigation, ureterorenoscopy, and more powerful antifungals such as amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine. This management draws from a myriad of specialties, including urology, infectious disease, and interventional radiology. Additionally, the literature has demonstrated that only approximately half of patients with fungemia receive an ophthalmologic evaluation. Ophthalmologic and urologic cooperation is essential in the case of obstructive uropathy leading to fungemia as the obstructive uropathy must be relieved and these patients should receive a dilated fundus exam.

Management of candiduria in hospitalized patients: a single-center study on the implementation of IDSA guidelines and factors affecting clinical decisions

Candiduria are common findings in clinic especially in hospitalized patients, while its significance remains undetermined. Since there are few criteria to follow, physicians tended to make decisions by personal experience in many cases in clinical practice. The present study was designed to unveil the present situation of candiduria management in hospitalized patients in clinical practice. A total of 251 hospitalized candiduria patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Clinical data on patient demographics, basic conditions, catheter using, urinary symptoms, laboratory data, and antifungal therapies were obtained from electronic medical records. The high rate of the candiduria cases were managed inappropriately after the introduction of the Infectious Diseases Association of America (IDSA) evidence-based recommendations, both in the management of urinary catheter and antifungal agents. Overtreatment was common in asymptomatic candiduria patients. For symptomatic patients, improper drug selections were not rare. In addition, a part of candiduria patients did not receive antifungal therapies although the IDSA recommends. A statistically significant difference was only found in hospital charges of symptomatic candiduria patients managed following IDSA or not. The recurrence rate, mortality, and hospital stay length were similar in candiduria patients regardless of the clinical management. Physicians tend to start empiric antifungal therapy for candiduria patients with pneumonia, multisite of Candida colonization, higher urine Candida CFUs, and long hospital stay. Candiduria has not received special attention today, and empirical antifungal treatment is common. IDSA guidelines are important to standardize the management of candiduria in clinic; however, the significance of the guidelines needs to be further clarified in future multicenter investigations.