Diagnostic performance of clinical properties and conventional magnetic resonance imaging for determining the IDH1 mutation status in glioblastoma: a retrospective study

Two-Stage Training Framework Using Multicontrast MRI Radiomics for IDH Mutation Status Prediction in Glioma

Purpose To develop a radiomics framework for preoperative MRI-based prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, a crucial glioma prognostic indicator. Materials and Methods Radiomics features (shape, first-order statistics, and texture) were extracted from the whole tumor or the combination of nonenhancing, necrosis, and edema regions. Segmentation masks were obtained via the federated tumor segmentation tool or the original data source. Boruta, a wrapper-based feature selection algorithm, identified relevant features. Addressing the imbalance between mutated and wild-type cases, multiple prediction models were trained on balanced data subsets using random forest or XGBoost and assembled to build the final classifier. The framework was evaluated using retrospective MRI scans from three public datasets (The Cancer Imaging Archive [TCIA, 227 patients], the University of California San Francisco Preoperative Diffuse Glioma MRI dataset [UCSF, 495 patients], and the Erasmus Glioma Database [EGD, 456 patients]) and internal datasets collected from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW, 356 patients), New York University (NYU, 136 patients), and University of Wisconsin-Madison (UWM, 174 patients). TCIA and UTSW served as separate training sets, while the remaining data constituted the test set (1617 or 1488 testing cases, respectively). Results The best performing models trained on the TCIA dataset achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.89 for UTSW, 0.86 for NYU, 0.93 for UWM, 0.94 for UCSF, and 0.88 for EGD test sets. The best performing models trained on the UTSW dataset achieved slightly higher AUCs: 0.92 for TCIA, 0.88 for NYU, 0.96 for UWM, 0.93 for UCSF, and 0.90 for EGD. Conclusion This MRI radiomics-based framework shows promise for accurate preoperative prediction of IDH mutation status in patients with glioma. Keywords: Glioma, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation, IDH Mutation, Radiomics, MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also commentary by Moassefi and Erickson in this issue.

Importance of Age and Noncontrast-Enhancing Tumor as Biomarkers for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutant Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the most useful clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters for differentiating isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant and -wildtype glioblastomas in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 327 patients with IDH-mutant or IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in the 2016 World Health Organization classification who preoperatively underwent MRI. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status was determined by immunohistochemistry, high-resolution melting analysis, and/or IDH1/2 sequencing. Three radiologists independently reviewed the tumor location, tumor contrast enhancement, noncontrast-enhancing tumor (nCET), and peritumoral edema. Two radiologists independently measured the maximum tumor size and mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients of the tumor. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with an odds ratio (OR) were performed.

RESULTS

The tumors were IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in 306 cases and IDH-mutant glioblastoma in 21. Interobserver agreement for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations was moderate to excellent. The univariate analyses revealed a significant difference in age, seizure, tumor contrast enhancement, and nCET (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed significant difference in age for all 3 readers (reader 1, odds ratio [OR] = 0.960, P = 0.012; reader 2, OR = 0.966, P = 0.048; reader 3, OR = 0.964, P = 0.026) and nCET for 2 readers (reader 1, OR = 3.082, P = 0.080; reader 2, OR = 4.500, P = 0.003; reader 3, OR = 3.078, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Age and nCET are the most useful parameters among the clinical and MRI parameters for differentiating IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype glioblastomas.

A Review of Radiomics and Deep Predictive Modeling in Glioma Characterization

Recent developments in glioma categorization based on biological genotypes and application of computational machine learning or deep learning based predictive models using multi-modal MRI biomarkers to assess these genotypes provides potential assurance for optimal and personalized treatment plans and efficacy. Artificial intelligence based quantified assessment of glioma using MRI derived hand-crafted or auto-extracted features have become crucial as genomic alterations can be associated with MRI based phenotypes. This survey integrates all the recent work carried out in state-of-the-art radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence based learning solutions related to molecular diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring with the aim to create a structured resource on radiogenomic analysis of glioma. Challenges such as inter-scanner variability, requirement of benchmark datasets, prospective validations for clinical applicability are discussed with further scope for designing optimal solutions for glioma stratification with immediate recommendations for further diagnostic decisions and personalized treatment plans for glioma patients.

Glioma grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization using MR diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) for grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization of gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with suspected gliomas underwent DIVIDE imaging, yielding parameter maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MK_A), isotropic mean kurtosis (MK_I), total mean kurtosis (MK_T), MK_A/MK_T, and microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA). Tumor type and grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 mutant status, and the Ki-67 labeling index (Ki-67 LI) were determined after surgery. Statistical analysis included 33 high-grade gliomas (HGG) and 17 low-grade gliomas (LGG). Tumor diffusion metrics were compared between HGG and LGG, among grades, and between wild and mutated IDH types using appropriate tests according to normality assessment results. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman correlation analysis were also used for statistical evaluations.

RESULTS

FA, MD, MK_A, MK_I, MK_T, μFA, and MK_A/MK_T differed between HGG and LGG (FA: p = 0.047; MD: p = 0.037, others p < 0.001), and among glioma grade II, III, and IV (FA: p = 0.048; MD: p = 0.038, others p < 0.001). All diffusion metrics differed between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors (MK_I: p = 0.003; others: p < 0.001). The metrics that best discriminated between HGG and LGGs and between wild-type and mutated IDH tumors were MK_T and FA respectively (area under the curve 0.866 and 0.881). All diffusion metrics except FA showed significant correlation with Ki-67 LI, and MK_I had the highest correlation coefficient (r_s = 0.618).

CONCLUSION

DIVIDE is a promising technique for glioma characterization and diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• DIVIDE metrics MK_I is related to cell density heterogeneity while MK_A and μFA are related to cell eccentricity. • DIVIDE metrics can effectively differentiate LGG from HGG and IDH mutation from wild-type tumor, and showed significant correlation with the Ki-67 labeling index. • MK_I was larger than MK_A which indicates predominant cell density heterogeneity in gliomas. • MK_A and MK_I increased with grade or degree of malignancy, however with a relatively larger increase in the cell eccentricity metric MK_A in relation to the cell density heterogeneity metric MK_I.

Fluid attenuation in non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET): an MRI Marker for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

The WHO 2016 update classifies glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation status. We aimed to determine MRI-based metrics for predicting IDH mutation in glioblastoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included glioblastoma cases (n = 199) with known IDH mutation status and pre-operative MRI (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T1W1 at minimum). Two neuroradiologists determined the following MRI metrics: (1) primary lobe of involvement (frontal or non-frontal); (2) presence/absence of contrast-enhancement; (3) presence/absence of necrosis; (4) presence/absence of fluid attenuation in the non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET); (5) maximum width of peritumoral edema (cm); (6) presence/absence of multifocal disease. Inter-reader agreement was determined. After resolving discordant measurements, multivariate association between consensus MRI metrics/patient age and IDH mutation status was determined.

RESULTS

Among 199 glioblastomas, 16 were IDH-mutant. Inter-reader agreement was calculated for contrast-enhancement (ĸ = 0.49 [- 0.11-1.00]), necrosis (ĸ = 0.55 [0.34-0.76]), fluid attenuation in nCET (ĸ = 0.83 [0.68-0.99]), multifocal disease (ĸ = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]), and primary lobe (ĸ = 0.85 [0.80-0.91]). Mean difference for peritumoral edema width between readers was 0.3 cm [0.2-0.5], p < 0.001. Multivariate analysis uncovered significant associations between IDH-mutation and fluid attenuation in nCET (OR 82.9 [19.22, ∞], p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.93 [0.86, 0.98], p = 0.009), frontal lobe location (OR 11.08 [1.14, 352.97], p = 0.037), and less peritumoral edema (OR 0.15 [0, 0.65], p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional MRI metrics and patient age predict IDH-mutation status in glioblastoma. Among MRI markers, fluid attenuation in nCET represents a novel marker with high inter-reader agreement that is strongly associated with Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant.

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review: Part 1 - Molecular, morphological and clinical features

With new therapeutic protocols, more patients treated for glioblastoma have experienced a suspicious radiologic image of progression (pseudoprogression) during follow-up. Pseudoprogression should be differentiated from true progression because the disease management is completely different. In the case of pseudoprogression, the follow-up continues, and the patient is considered stable. In the case of true progression, a treatment adjustment is necessary. Presently, a pseudoprogression diagnosis certainly needs to be pathologically confirmed. Some important efforts in the radiological, histopathological, and genomic fields have been made to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and the assessment of response criteria exists but remains limited. The aim of this paper is to highlight clinical and pathological markers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression through a literature review.