1
|
Choi G, Giuliano D, Tibbles A, Howarth SJ, Tran S, Lee J, Funabashi M. Investigating force-time characteristics of prone thoracic SMT and self-reported patient outcome measures: a feasibility study. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:19. [PMID: 37420257 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00491-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is commonly used to treat musculoskeletal conditions, including thoracic spine pain. Applying patient-specific force-time characteristics are believed to be important to improve SMT's effectiveness. Investigating SMT as part of a multimodal approach is fundamental to account for the complexity of chiropractic clinical practice. Therefore, pragmatic investigations balancing minimal disruptions to the clinical encounter at the same time as ensuring a robust data quality with rigorous protocols are needed. Consequently, preliminary studies are required to assess the study protocol, quality of data recorded and the sustainability of such investigation. Therefore, this study examined the feasibility of investigating SMT force-time characteristics and clinical outcome measures in a clinical setting. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, providers recorded thoracic SMT force-time characteristics delivered to patients with thoracic spinal pain during regular clinical encounters. Self-reported clinical outcomes of pain, stiffness, comfort during the SMT (using an electronic visual analogue scale), and global rating of change scale were measured before and after each SMT application. Feasibility was quantitatively assessed for participant recruitment, data collection and data quality. Qualitative data assessed participants' perceptions on the impact of data collection on patient management and clinical flow. RESULTS Twelve providers (58% female, 27.3 ± 5.0 years old) and twelve patients (58% female, 37.2 ± 14.0 years old) participated in the study. Enrolment rate was greater than 40%, data collection rate was 49% and erroneous data was less than 5%. Participant acceptance was good with both providers and patients reporting positive experience with the study. CONCLUSIONS Recording SMT force-time characteristics and self-reported clinical outcome measures during a clinical encounter may be feasible with specific modification to the current protocol. The study protocol did not negatively impact patient management. Specific strategies to optimize the data collection protocol for the development of a large clinical database are being developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grand Choi
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Dominic Giuliano
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Anthony Tibbles
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Samuel J Howarth
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Steve Tran
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Joyce Lee
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Martha Funabashi
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Funabashi M, Wang S, Lee AD, C K Duarte F, Budgell B, Stilwell P, Hogg-Johnson S. Discomfort, pain and stiffness: what do these terms mean to patients? A cross-sectional survey with lexical and qualitative analyses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:283. [PMID: 35331201 PMCID: PMC8944041 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05214-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While pain is often the focus of clinical interventions, other clinical outcomes (e.g., discomfort, stiffness) might also contribute to patients' functionality and well-being. Although researchers and clinicians may view discomfort, pain and stiffness as different constructs, it remains unclear how patients perceive and differentiate between these constructs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore patients' perceptions of pain, discomfort, and stiffness. METHODS Chiropractic patients were invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey and describe what 'discomfort', 'pain' and 'stiffness' meant to them using their own words. Lexical and inductive qualitative content analyses were conducted independently and then triangulated. RESULTS Fifty-three chiropractic patients (47.2% female, mean age: 39.1 ± 15.1 years) responded. The most common combinations of words to describe discomfort were "can be ignored" and "less severe than". "Cannot be ignored" and "sharp shooting" were used to describe pain. "Limited range of motion" was used to describe stiffness. Qualitatively, five themes were developed: impact, character, feeling, intensity and temporality. Stiffness was described as limited movement/mobility. Although discomfort and stiffness impacted patients' activities, patients remained functional; pain was described as stopping/limiting activities. Discomfort was described as dull and tingling, pain as sharp and shooting, and stiffness as tight and restricted. Patients felt displeased and annoyed when experiencing discomfort and stiffness but hurt and in danger of harm when experiencing pain. Discomfort and stiffness were described as less intense than pain, with shorter/intermittent duration; however, all constructs could be experienced constantly. CONCLUSION Patients perceived discomfort, pain and stiffness as different, yet overlapping constructs. This preliminary work advances our knowledge of how patients conceptualize these constructs, contributing to better understanding of what patients mean when reporting these experiences, potentially improving the clinician-patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Funabashi
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. .,Université du Québec À Trois-Rivières, 3351 boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
| | - Simon Wang
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Alexander D Lee
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Felipe C K Duarte
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Brian Budgell
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Peter Stilwell
- McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada.,University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harsted S, Nyirö L, Downie A, Kawchuk GN, O'Neill S, Holm L, Nim CG. Posterior to anterior spinal stiffness measured in a sample of 127 secondary care low back pain patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2021; 87:105408. [PMID: 34157436 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sensation of spinal stiffness is a commonly reported symptom among back pain patients, with the clinical assessment of spinal stiffness usually being part of the decision-making process when deciding on providing manual treatment of low back pain. While any relationship between spinal stiffness and low back pain is likely to be multifactorial, prior exploration of this relationship has been overly simplistic (e.g., univariate regression analyses). The purpose of this study was to address this gap by taking a broader approach to compare instrumented measures of spinal stiffness to demographic characteristics, pain phenotypes, psychometrics, and spine-related disability in a sample of secondary care low back pain patients using multivariate regression analysis. METHODS Instrumented spinal stiffness measures from 127 patients in secondary care were used to calculate terminal and global spinal stiffness scores. A best subset analysis was used to find the subsets of 14 independent variables that most accurately predicted stiffness based on the evaluation of the adjusted R-square, Akaike Information Criteria, and the Bayesian Information Criteria. FINDINGS In the resulting multivariate models, sex (p < 0.001) and age (p < 0.001) were the primary determinants of terminal stiffness, while global stiffness was primarily determined by age (p = 0.003) and disability (p = 0.024). INTERPRETATION Instrumented measures of spinal stiffness are multifactorial in nature, and future research into this area should make use of multivariate analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steen Harsted
- Research Unit for Clinical Biomechanics, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
| | - Luana Nyirö
- Integrative Spinal Research Group, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aron Downie
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Gregory N Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, 8205 114St, 2-50 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G4, Canada
| | - Søren O'Neill
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Liam Holm
- Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Casper Glissmann Nim
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Spine Center of Southern Denmark, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Østre Hougvej 55, 5500 Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hadizadeh M, Kawchuk G, French S. A consensus approach toward the standardization of spinal stiffness measurement using a loaded rolling wheel device: results of a Delphi study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:436. [PMID: 33985464 PMCID: PMC8120899 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04313-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal stiffness assessment has the potential to become an important clinical measure. Various spinal stiffness-testing devices are available to help researchers objectively evaluate the spine and patient complaints. One of these is VerteTrack, a device capable of measuring posteroanterior displacement values over an entire spinal region. This study aimed to develop a best-practice protocol for evaluating spinal stiffness in human participants using VerteTrack. METHODS Twenty-five individuals with research experience in measuring spinal stiffness, or who were trained in spinal stiffness measurement using the VerteTrack device, were invited to participate in this 3-Round Delphi study. Answers to open-ended questions in Round 1 were thematically analyzed and translated into statements about VerteTrack operation for spinal stiffness measurements. Participants then rated their level of agreement with these statements using a 5-point Likert scale in Rounds 2 and 3. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of the participants either strongly agreed, agreed, (or strongly disagreed, disagreed) to include a statement in the final protocol. RESULTS Twenty participants completed Round 1 (80%). All these participants completed Rounds 2 and 3. In total, the pre-defined consensus threshold was reached for 67.2% (123/183) of statements after three rounds of surveys. From this, a best-practice protocol was created. CONCLUSIONS Using a Delphi approach, a consensus-based protocol for measuring spinal stiffness using the VerteTrack was developed. This standard protocol will help to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of spinal stiffness measurements, facilitate the training of new operators, increase consistency of these measurements in multicenter studies, and provide the synergy and potential for data comparison between spine studies internationally. Although specific to VerteTrack, the resulting standard protocol could be modified for use with other devices designed to collect spinal stiffness measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maliheh Hadizadeh
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4 Canada
| | - Greg Kawchuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 3-44 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4 Canada
| | - Simon French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|