Boxer's fracture: management and outcomes

Comparison of the radiological and functional results of a plaster splint and dynamic stabilization splint for Boxer's fractures: A prospective randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

This study compared the clinical and radiological results of fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with a short-arm plaster splint (SAPS) versus a dynamic metacarpal stabilization splint (DMSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 119 patients were referred to our institute between 2018 and 2019 and treated with SAPS or DMSS after appropriate initial closed reduction. Follow-up examinations were conducted at days 10 and 20, and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Alignment of the fracture, range of motion (ROM), and complications were evaluated during each visit. Grip strength was evaluated using a dynamometer. Self-care, usual daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were evaluated using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and a VAS.

RESULTS

Of the 119 patients, 103 completed all follow up examinations. In total, 51 patients were treated with SAPS and 52 with DMSS. Skin lesions were detected in five patients in the DMSS group, but none in the SAPS group (p = 0.008). The grip strength of patients in the DMSS group was statistically better at the 1-, 2-month and 3-month follow-up visits (p < 0.001). ROM of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints were statistically better in the DMSS group at the 1-month visit (p < 0.001) but similar at the 3-month visit (p = 0.27). Wrist ROM was statistically higher in the DMSS group at the 3-month visit (p < 0.05). Self-care, usual daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were statistically better in the DMSS group at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), as determined by the EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic stabilization of a stable boxer's fracture with DMSS is as effective as static stabilization with SAPS for maintaining the reduction and ensuring union. However, DMSS provides better early ROM, comfort, and muscle strength, as well as an earlier return to usual daily activities despite the occasional skin lesions happened.

Functional Hand-Based Splint in the Treatment of Metacarpal Fractures

Background: Post-treatment stiffness remains a significant hurdle following treatment for displaced or minimally displaced metacarpal fractures. Treatment goals should focus on a stable and acceptable reduction, minimal patient morbidity, and optimal mobility. Methods: A retrospective review of all non-operative metacarpal fractures over a five-month period at a tertiary center hand clinic treated with a hand-based splint were reviewed for radiologic and clinical stability. The splint allowed metacarpophalngeal joint, interphalangeal joint, and radiocarpal joint motion. Data collected included age, handedness, type and location of fracture, occupation, and ability to continue working. Radiologic images were reviewed by a radiologist not otherwise involved in patient care. Results: Thirty-three patients were reviewed with a total of 39 fractures of the second, third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals. Nine patients had nondominant hand fractures while 24 were dominant hand injuries. Twenty out of 24 patients employed pre-injury were able to continue working without missing any days. Three patients were lost to the final follow-up. The average splint duration was 24 days. Twenty-seven of 30 patients showed no change in alignment from start of splinting to end, while three showed some change but remained within non-operative criteria. Conclusion: A hand-based functional splint for metacarpal fractures allows for excellent maintenance of fracture reduction, early or immediate return to pre-injury activities, low patient morbidity, and maintains functional motion throughout treatment. It can be applied to any non-operative fracture of the second through the fifth metacarpal.

POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND FOR GUIDANCE OF CLOSED REDUCTION OF FIFTH METACARPAL NECK (BOXER'S) FRACTURE

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound has been used previously in fracture identification, analgesia delivery, and fracture reduction for patients in the emergency department. It has not been previously described as a tool for the guidance of closed fracture reduction in fifth metacarpal neck fractures ("boxer's fractures").

CASE REPORT

A 28-year-old man presented with hand pain and swelling after punching a wall. Point-of-care ultrasound revealed a significantly angulated fifth metacarpal fracture, which was confirmed with a subsequent hand x-ray study. After an ultrasound-guided ulnar nerve block, closed reduction was performed. Ultrasound was used to assess reduction and ensure improvement in bony angulation during the closed reduction attempts. Post-reduction x-ray study confirmed improved angulation and adequate alignment. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? Point-of-care ultrasound has previously had efficacy in fracture diagnosis and anesthesia delivery for fifth metacarpal fractures. Ultrasound can also be used at the bedside to assist in the determination of adequate fracture reduction when performing closed reduction of a boxer's fracture.

The Conservative Treatment of Some Hand and Carpal Fractures

In recent decades, there has been a trend toward increased use of operative treatment of hand fractures. However, internal stabilization with wires or open reduction and internal fixation of the phalanges and the metacarpals carries a risk of surgical complications that can be avoided by using appropriate conservative treatment. In this article, some hand fractures that can be managed safely without surgery are discussed. In conclusion, when facing a fracture in the hand, the first consideration is whether the fracture can be treated nonoperatively and not which operative treatment is most appropriate. This applies to both displaced and undisplaced fractures.

Challenging the dogma: severely angulated neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal must be treated surgically

Cadaveric studies suggest that the acceptable deformity in fifth metacarpal neck fractures is maximally 30° palmar angulation. This systematic review verifies the validity of these threshold values. Eighteen prospective comparative studies on operative and/or conservative treatment options in adults were included. None of the studies demonstrated any correlation between the residual or initial angulation and the clinical results despite accepting more severe angular deformities. Closed reduction and immobilization without internal fixation improved the palmar angle by 5° to 9° in three studies and 29° in a fourth. Operative treatments compared with non-reducing conservative treatments showed no benefit of the surgery other than aesthetic issues. The synthesis of this review indicates that 90% of fractures of the metacarpal neck with apex angulation up to 70° can be treated successfully with a functional metacarpal brace without reduction. Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores <10 are uniformly reported. I modified my own practice accordingly a decade ago to treating these fractures conservatively regardless of the palmar angulation, except in patients with exceptional demands or other fracture deformities.