Improving the identification of patients with delirium using the 4AT assessment

A quality improvement project addressing the underreporting of delirium in hip fracture patients

INTRODUCTION

After discovering a low incidence of delirium for hip fracture patients at our institution, we evaluated if this was due to underreporting and, if so, where process errors occurred.

METHODS

Hip fracture patients aged ≥60 with a diagnosis of delirium were identified. Chart-Based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL) identified missed diagnoses of delirium. Process maps were created based off staff interviews and observations.

RESULTS

The incidence of delirium was 15.3% (N = 176). Within a random sample (n = 98), 15 patients (15.5%) were diagnosed, while 20 (24.7%) went undiagnosed despite evidence of delirium. Including missed diagnoses, delirium prevalence was higher in the sample compared to all patients (35.7% vs 15.3%, p < 0.001). Most missed diagnoses were due to failure in identifying delirium (60%) or failure in documenting/coding diagnosis (20%). The prevalence of baseline cognitive impairment was higher in undiagnosed delirium patients versus correctly diagnosed patients (80% vs 20%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our institution significantly underreports delirium among hip fracture patients mainly due to; (1) failure to identify delirium by the clinical staff, and (2) failure to document/code diagnosis despite correct identification. Baseline cognitive impairment can render delirium diagnosis challenging. These serve as targets for quality improvement and hip fracture care enhancement.

A Quality Improvement Study on Delirium Awareness Day: In Pursuit of Missed Delirium Diagnoses

The current study aimed to screen for delirium in hospitalized older adults and assess the validity of the Turkish version of the 4A's Test (4AT-TR) as a feasible tool to integrate in routine patient care. The point prevalence of delirium according to clinical evaluation in routine practice was detected among all patients aged ≥60 years in 12 pilot wards. Delirium screening was then conducted by two arms: (a) nurses using the 4AT-TR and (b) geriatricians according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) criteria. Prevalence of delirium according to clinical impression was 3.3% (n = 4), whereas prevalence was 12.4% (n = 17) according to DSM-5 criteria and 13.8% (n = 17) according to the 4AT-TR. The 4AT-TR performed by nurses had a sensitivity of 66.6% and specificity of 93.5%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for delirium diagnosis was 0.819 (p < 0.001). Most delirium cases remain undetected unless a routine and formal delirium assessment is integrated in hospital care of high-risk patients. The 4AT-TR performed by nurses seems to be a valid tool for determining delirium in hospitalized older adults. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(8), 43-51.].

Impact of a dementia-friendly program on detection and management of patients with cognitive impairment and delirium in acute-care hospital units: a controlled clinical trial design

Background

Frail older persons with cognitive impairment (CI) are at special risk of experiencing delirium during acute hospitalisation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a dementia-friendly hospital program contributes to improved detection and management of patients with CI and risk of delirium at an acute-care hospital in Norway. Furthermore, we aimed to explore whether the program affected the detection of delirium, pharmacological treatment, 30-day re-hospitalisation, 30-day mortality and institutionalisation afterwards.

Methods

This study was part of a larger quality improvement project aiming at developing and implementing a new program for early screening and management of patients with CI. This study, evaluating the program are designed as a controlled clinical trial with a historical control group. It was conducted at two different medical wards at a large acute-care hospital in Norway from September 2018 to December 2019. A total of 423 acute hospitalised patients 75 years of age or older were included in the study. Delirium screening and cognitive tests were recorded by research staff with the 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) and the Confusion Assessment Measure (CAM), while demographic and medical information was recorded from the electronic medical records (EMR).

Results

Implementation of the dementia-friendly hospital program did not show any significant changes in the identification of patients with CI. However, the share of patients screened with 4AT within 24 h increased from 0% to 35.5% (P < .001). The proportion of the patients with CI identified by the clinical staff, who received measures to promote “dementia-friendly” care and reduce the risk for delirium increased by 32.2% (P < .001), compared to the control group. Furthermore, the number of patients with CI who were prescribed antipsychotic, hypnotic or sedative medications was reduced by 24.5% (P < .001). There were no differences in delirium detection, 30-day readmission or 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

A model for early screening and multifactorial non-pharmacological interventions for patients with CI and delirium may improve management of this patient group, and reduce prescriptions of antipsychotic, hypnotic and sedative medications. The implementation in clinical practice of early screening using quality improvement methodology deserves attention.

Trial registration

The protocol of this study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System with the registration number: NCT04737733 and date of registration: 03/02/2021.

Comparison of the '4-item assessment test' and 'nursing delirium screening scale' delirium screening tools on non-intensive care unit wards: A prospective mixed-method approach

BACKGROUND

In elderly patients following surgery, postoperative delirium (POD) is the most frequent complication and is associated with negative outcomes. The 2017 European Society of Anaesthesiology guideline on POD aims to improve patient care by implementing structured delirium prevention, diagnosis and treatment. However, these recommendations, especially systematic delirium screening, are still incompletely adopted in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptance of validated delirium screening tools and to identify barriers to their implementation on nonintensive care unit wards.

METHODS

Screening rates, as well as practicability, acceptance and the interprofessional handling of positive results, were assessed for each group. Screening rates were calculated as a percentage of the total potential testing episodes completed (up to 15 per patient). Patients were considered eligible when aged 65 years and above. Barriers and motivating factors were assessed in a mixed method approach by utilising questionnaires and focus group discussions.

INTERVENTION

In a 3-month phase, a guideline-compliant screening protocol involving screening for POD three times daily for 5 days following surgery was introduced in five wards: both the 4-item assessment test (4AT) and the nursing delirium screening scale (NuDESC) were used. Before commencing the study and again after 6 weeks, medical staff of the respective wards underwent a 45 min training session.

RESULTS

Of a total of 3183 potential testing episodes, 999 (31.4%) were completed, with more NuDESC observational tests (43%) than 4AT bedside tests completed (20%). The 4AT was considered more difficult to integrate into daily working routines, it took longer to administer, and nurses felt uncomfortable conducting the screening (53 vs. 13%). Screening results indicating delirium were often not discussed within the team (47%), and nurses felt that often such results were not taken seriously by physicians (54%).

CONCLUSION

The observational NuDESC showed a higher completion rate than the bedside 4AT, although overall testing rates were low. The necessary time needed to conduct the screening, the negative reactions by patients, insufficient team communication and a lack of initiation of any therapy were identified as major barriers in the implementation of the guideline-compliant screening protocol. For all staff, further education and awareness of the importance of POD diagnosis and treatment might improve the screening rates. The NuDesc received better results concerning acceptance, practicability and introduction into daily work routine, leading to higher screening rates compared with the 4AT. The latter instrument, which was intended to be used rather selectively or when POD is suspected, might therefore not be suitable for guideline-compliant regular and repeated screening for POD.

Use of a digital delirium pathway and quality improvement to improve delirium detection in the emergency department and outcomes in an acute hospital

BACKGROUND

delirium is a common condition associated with hospital admission. Detection and diagnosis is important to identify the underlying precipitating cause and implement effective management and treatment. Quality improvement (QI) methodology has been applied in limited publications. There are even fewer publications of the role of development of the electronic health record (EHR) to enhance implementation.

METHODS

we used QI methodology to improve delirium detection in the emergency department (ED). Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles could be broadly categorised into technology, training and education and leadership. As part of the technology PDSA an electronic delirium pathway was developed as part of an NHS England digital systems improvement initiative (NHS England Global Digital Exemplar). The electronic pathway incorporated the 4AT screening tool, the Confusion Assessment Method, the TIME delirium management bundle, investigation order sets and automated coding of delirium as a health issue.

RESULTS

development of the EHR combined with education initiatives had benefit in terms of the number of people assessed for delirium on admission to the ED and the total number of people diagnosed with delirium across the organisation. The implementation of a delirium pathway as part of the EHR improved the use of 4AT in those 65 years and over from baseline of 3% completion in October 2017 to 43% in January 2018.

CONCLUSION

we showed that enhancement of the digital record can improve delirium assessment and diagnosis. Furthermore, the implementation of a delirium pathway is enhanced by staff education.