Perceptions of patients' pain: a study assessing nurses' attitudes

Attitudes and Beliefs About Chronic Pain Among Nurses-Biomedical or Behavioral? A Cross-sectional Survey

CONTEXT

Studies have documented that nurses and other health care professionals are inadequately prepared to care for patients in chronic pain. Several reasons have been identified including inadequacies in nursing education, absence of curriculum content related to pain management, and attitudes and beliefs related to chronic pain.

AIMS

The objective of this paper was to assess the chronic pain-related attitudes and beliefs among nursing professionals in order to evaluate the biomedical and behavioral dimensions of their perceptions on pain.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of 363 nurses in a multispecialty hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study utilized a self-report questionnaire - pain attitudes and beliefs scale (PABS) - which had 31 items (statements about pain) for each of which the person had to indicate the level at which he or she agreed or disagreed with each statement. Factor 1 score indicated a biomedical dimension while factor 2 score indicated a behavioral dimension to pain.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Comparisons across individual and professional variables for both dimensions were done using one-way ANOVA and correlations were done using the Karl-Pearson co-efficient using SPSS version 11.5 for Windows.

RESULTS

The overall factor 1 score was 52.95 ± 10.23 and factor 2 score was 20.93 ± 4.72 (P = 0.00). The female nurses had a higher behavioral dimension score (21.1 ± 4.81) than their male counterparts (19.55 ± 3.67) which was significant at P < 0.05 level.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses had a greater orientation toward the biomedical dimension of chronic pain than the behavioral dimension. This difference was more pronounced in female nurses and those nurses who reported very "good" general health had higher behavioral dimension scores than those who had good general health. The study findings have important curricular implications for nurses and practical implications in palliative care.

How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions

AIM

This paper is a report of a study to explore how military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions, particularly when these differ from patients' pain self-reports.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors that make assessment difficult. Nurses are taught to believe what patients say about their pain. However, their attitudes to pain are influenced by their cultural background and they may disagree with patients' self-reports. Military nurses belong to a military culture with different pain attitudes that may also influence their postoperative pain assessment.

METHOD

An ethnomethodological ethnography study was carried out in 2003. A purposive sample of 29 British military surgical/orthopaedic Registered Nurses were interviewed to identify their taken-for-granted assumptions and commonsense cultural knowledge surrounding postoperative pain assessment. The data were analysed using a systematic process of inductive reasoning aided by Non-numerical, Unstructured Data for Indexing, Searching and Theorizing (QSR N6, NUD*IST).

FINDINGS

Participants told two distinct stories in their postoperative pain narratives. The first, the cultural story, described how military nurses normally assess postoperative pain and revealed taken-for-granted assumptions surrounding this assessment. However, when military nurses believe that patients over- or under-report their pain, the cultural story was challenged through a collective story in which nurses used their commonsense knowledge to account for these differences.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain assessment within a military culture is complex, but all nurses need to be aware that their socialization into different nursing cultures may influence their attitudes to postoperative pain assessment.

Student nurses' attitudes to pain relieving drugs

This paper reports the results of a longitudinal survey of 217 student nurses undertaken during their common foundation programme (CFP), which comprises the first 18 months of the course. The study explored changes during the CFP in students' perceptions of the risk of addiction and their attitudes towards analgesics. The results revealed that although the students had a more accurate view of the risk of addiction by the end of the CFP there was still an exaggerated fear of the risk of addiction in over half the students. Follow-up interviews with 14 students also indicated that students displayed a more general wariness in relation to the use of analgesics.

An intervention study to enhance postoperative pain management

This study, conducted before and after the implementation of an acute pain service (APS) in a 1000-bed hospital, describes the process of the implementation of an APS. The nursing, anesthesia, and surgery departments were involved. In this study we sought to evaluate the results of a continuous quality improvement program by defining quality indicators and using quality tools. A quality program in accordance with current standards of acute pain treatment (multimodal) was worked out to enhance pain relief for all surgical inpatients. A survey of nurses' knowledge with regard to postoperative pain was conducted, and a visual analog scale (VAS) was introduced to assess pain intensity. Both nurses and physicians became familiar with evidence-based guidelines concerning postoperative pain. The entire process was monitored in three consecutive surveys and enrolled 2383 surgical inpatients. Pain indicators based on VAS and analgesic consumption were recorded during the first 72 postoperative hours. After a baseline survey about current practices of pain treatment, a nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised APS was implemented. The improvement in pain relief, expressed as VAS scores, was assessed in two further surveys. A quality manual was written and implemented. A major improvement in pain scores was observed after the APS inception (P < 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

The implementation of an acute pain service, including pain assessment by a visual analog scale, standard multimodal pain treatment, and continuous quality evaluation, improved postoperative pain relief. Establishing teams of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses is the prerequisite for this improvement.

Refusing analgesics: using continuous improvement to improve pain management on a surgical ward

Despite advances in pain control many patients experience moderate to severe pain whilst in hospital. Contributory factors include inadequate assessment and documentation of pain, as well as patient and professional misconceptions. A 28-bedded surgical ward in a District General Hospital in the South of England was the setting for the project. A small preliminary audit of pain on this ward indicated that some patients experienced postoperative pain, which was not effectively controlled. A 'continuous improvement' framework was used to increase understanding of the problem and identify an aim for the project, which was to reduce the number of patients refusing analgesics when offered by nurses. An audit to ascertain how many patients refused analgesia revealed that, of 133 patients offered, 93 (70%) refused. Using the 'Model for Improvement' (Langley et al., 1996) a number of changes were introduced, including a patient information sheet, regular documented pain assessment and an innovative staff education programme. To evaluate if the changes in practice had been successful, further audit data were collected from 167 patients. Sixty-three (44%) accepted analgesics, indicating a significant decrease in the number refusing (P = 0.005). This small project demonstrated that continuous improvement methodology can improve the management of pain and quality of care for patients. Such an approach brings practitioner and patient into meaningful understanding and offers solutions which are realistic, achievable and sustainable over time. Despite finite resources and increased pressure on staff it is possible to motivate people when they feel they have ownership and change is meaningful. Continuous improvement methods offer an exciting, feasible, patient-centred approach to improving care.

Effects of performance feedback on patient pain outcomes

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an individual feedback intervention provided to nurses on selected patient outcomes related to postoperative pain management Individual performance feedback served as the intervention. Thirty orthopedic staff nurses received feedback information on their past performance of recommended pain management practices. Data were collected preintervention and postintervention on selected patient pain outcomes from the medical records of 240 patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. The patient outcome measures were mean 4-hour pain intensity ratings, mean highest pain intensity ratings, mean number of times pain ratings exceeded patients' acceptable level of pain, mean administered morphine equivalents, and mean pain ratings on reassessment following analgesia administration. An improvement was noted in all pain outcomes following the feedback intervention. Results indicate that providing nurses with feedback on their past performance of pain management practices may contribute to decreased postoperative pain.

Pressure area management in an orthopaedic setting

Pressure area care for patients who have undergone a hip replacement is extremely difficult as patients' mobility tends to be restricted because of fear of dislocation. Orthopaedic surgeons influence the positional changes and techniques utilized by nurses in the postoperative period. This article reviews factors that prevent early rehabilitation and highlights methods of pressure relief for this patient group. Alternating-pressure mattresses are a main source of pressure-relieving equipment. A pilot study using the Nimbus II mattress was carried out to establish the role of alternating-pressure mattresses in the postoperative management of patients undergoing elective/emergency hip replacement surgery. None of the patients in the pilot study suffered prosthetic dislocation and 87% did not develop pressure sores. Three patients did develop a grade 2 pressure sore postoperatively. The results reinforce the use of alternating-pressure mattresses in the postoperative management of patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.