Assessment of Insulin Injection Technique Among Diabetic Patients in Makkah Region in Saudi Arabia

Are People With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Appropriately Following Insulin Injection Technique Practices: A Review of Literature

People with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) need to take multiple doses of insulin injections daily throughout their lives. However, a notable portion of people with diabetes mellitus (DM) show suboptimal insulin injection technique practices. They are supposed to follow the recommended insulin injection technique guidelines. Our explorative literature search, including studies from the past 30 years, is expected to identify the deficiencies of self-injection insulin techniques and the associated complications in people with T1DM, where we have summarised the overall incidence of complications that have occurred due to nonadherence of the prescribed guidelines, along with their associated risk factors. We have attempted to include multiple systematic reviews, meta-analyses, literature reviews, case reports, and original articles from the search engines and databases like PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and BioMed Central, and studies with only human participants were included in this search. The knowledge sharing from this research may be utilised for enhancing the structured education diabetes programme and implementing the population-based corrective measures, including the thrust areas in future multi-centre longitudinal research studies and recommendations, which can prevent unnecessary complications and enhance their quality of life. Correct insulin administration technique, abstaining from administration of injection at the areas with lipohypertrophy, rotation of injection sites, and ultrasound scanning can be used as a complimentary method to detect the lipohypertrophy at an early stage. Liposuction is beneficial in reducing the extensive lipohypertrophic tissues but helps achieve only cosmetically satisfactory outcome; thus, empowering people to follow insulin injection technique guidelines is one of the best strategies to reduce the high prevalence of lipohypertrophy. To conclude, education among the people with DM, especially T1DM who have to take insulin regularly, needs to be carried out consistently in the clinical settings, to prevent the severe complications caused due to inappropriate insulin injection techniques.

Expert Opinion on Addressing the Gap in Injection Technique and Needle Reuse for People with Diabetes in Indonesia

The use of insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus in Indonesia appears to be under expectation; moreover, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the proper injection technique and pen needle reuse by both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. To address these issues, a scientific expert meeting was held with the participation of endocrinologists and public health specialist from many different organizations in Indonesia to identify the challenges and problem related to injection technique, high pen needle reuse rate, and the need of all stakeholders. The experts agreed that it is necessary to ensure physicians to start the initiation phase as early as indicated, continue optimizing its dosage to reach targeted blood sugar based on guideline, and involve all relevant stakeholders to improve insulin distribution and patient access in every primary care facility in order to optimize the use of insulin or other injectable diabetes medications in Indonesia. Additionally, the experts believed that education on proper injection technique and improved reuse rate of pen needle is necessary. To date, Indonesian Diabetes Educators Association (IDEA/PEDI) has established guideline on injection technique. There are also recommendations on injection technique and needle reuse from Indonesian Society of Endocrinology (PERKENI) and Forum for Injection Technique & Therapy: Expert Recommendations (FITTER); however, this guideline/recommendation should be disseminated more widely among HCPs. In addition, cost-effectiveness studies based on local data are needed to propose and convince the Payors and other stakeholders. This article can be used as a guidance for HCPs and policymakers to improve current practice on injection technique, pen needle reuse, needle prescription and reimbursement policy in Indonesia and elsewhere.

Insulin injection practice and health related quality of life among individuals with diabetes at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Insulin therapy can be inconvenient, painful, burdensome, and restrict patients' daily activities and health related quality of life (HRQOL) due to improper injection techniques or the nature of administration.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess insulin injection practice, HRQOL and predictors among patients treated with insulin at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH).

METHODS

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among diabetes patients on insulin therapy from May to June 2022. A structured questionnaire was used to collect patient characteristics and insulin injection practice. The validated Amharic version of an EQ-5D-5L tool was used to assess the HRQOL. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The patient data were summarized using descriptive statistics. One-way ANOVA using Kruskal-Wallis H tests was used to assess factors that predict insulin handling practice scores. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess factors affecting HRQOL among diabetes patients treated with insulin. The EQ5D-5L utility scores of the patients were calculated using disutility coefficients taken from the Ethiopian general population. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 319 patients who agreed and completed the survey, 51.1% of them were males. Almost half of the participants (n = 158) were > 50 years of age. Among the study participants, 62.1% were only on intermediate acting insulin. A significantly higher proportion of participants 291(91.2%) in this study were taking insulin two times per day. Most of the participants 234(73.4%) had fair practice with a median insulin handling practice score of 38 out of 56. Patient characteristics such as age, educational status, occupation, disease duration, and type of diabetes were significantly association with insulin injection practice (p < 0.05). The mean ± SD utility score of patients were 0.89 ± 0.19 (ranged from -0.04 to 1). Being female (β = -5.42, 95%CI:-8.63,-2.21, p = 0.001) and treated for type-I diabetes mellitus (β =  + 9.04, 95%CI: 4.23,13.85, p-value < 0.0001) were significantly associated with HRQOL of patients on insulin therapy.

CONCLUSION

The study participants had fair practices in insulin handling, storage, and administration techniques, and it was seen that male and type one diabetes patients have a better quality of life compared to their counterparts.

Effect of Insulin Injection Techniques on Glycemic Control Among Patients with Diabetes

Objective

Previous studies have shown that healthcare professionals rarely instruct patients about proper insulin injection techniques. This study aimed to assess the practices of insulin injection techniques among patients with diabetes treated and assess the effect of these practices on glycemic control.

Patients and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2020 and February 2021. A random systematic sampling technique was used to recruit study subjects at specialist outpatient clinics. Subjects with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus who had been using insulin injections for at least a year were included in this study.

Results

A total of 298 subjects with type 1 diabetes and 553 with type 2 diabetes participated in this study. The mean age of patients with type 1 diabetes was 20.1 ± 10.4 years. The mean age of patients with type 2 diabetes was 58.6 ± 9.5 years. The median type 1 diabetes duration was 6.0 years, and median type 2 diabetes duration was 15.0 years. About 66.8% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 69.4% of patients with type 2 diabetes were rotating insulin injection sites. Almost 36.6% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 50.5% of patients with type 2 diabetes reported using the same insulin needle more than three times. The prevalence of lipohypertrophy was 57.0% among patients with type 1 diabetes and 55.5% among patients with type 2 diabetes. The absence of lipohypertrophy, rotation of insulin injection site, and total daily insulin dose ≤50 units were all independently significantly associated with better glycemic control.

Conclusion

Insulin injection techniques were suboptimal among significant proportion of patients with diabetes in Jordan. Improper insulin injection technique, especially the rotation of injection sites and lipohypertrophy formation, was associated with uncontrolled blood glucose levels. Educational interventions that focus on insulin injection techniques among Jordanian patients with diabetes are strongly recommended.

Patient-Reported Preference and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Pen Devices With Safety Needles in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study

Purpose Current evidence indicates that diabetic patients' preference and medication adherence can be affected by the type of insulin pen needles. We aimed to assess the impact of insulin pen devices with safety needles (SPN) on the usability, behavioral, lifestyle, and emotional aspects of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in adolescents and young adults. Patients and methods We conducted a prospective single-center study on adolescent T1DM patients treated with multiple insulin doses using basal-bolus therapy for at least one year. Patients were followed for 12 weeks to compare the changes in the baseline usability and insulin fear of self-injection scales between SPN and conventional needles. Results In this 12-week study, we included 72 participants with a mean age of 15.5 ± 1.3 years. The mean disease duration was 5.1 ± 2.2 years. At 12 weeks, substantial improvement was evident in the SPN group, compared to the conventional group, in terms of the overall satisfaction score with a mean difference (MD) of 4.1 ± 1.9 (p < 0.01). Participants in the SPN group reported significant reduction in all aspect of fear from self-injection, such as being restless (MD = -1.4 ± 0.9), tense (MD = -1.8 ± 0.9), afraid (MD = -1.9 ± 0.9), worried (MD = -1.9 ± 0.9), nervous (MD = -1.7 ± 0.9), and brood using the SPN needles (MD = -1.6 ± 0.9), as compared to the conventional needles group. The glycemic control parameters, as determined by HbA1c and fasting blood glucose, exhibited significant improvements in the SPN group compared to the conventional group (p < 0.05). Conclusion SPN significantly improved usability, glycemic parameters, and reduced the fear of insulin self-injections amongst T1DM patients compared to conventional pen therapy.