CHA2DS2-VASc Is Associated With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study

Infective Endocarditis and Antithrombotic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) is progressively raising because of the increasing number of cardiovascular invasive procedures, support treatment and devices, awareness in the medical community, and improved diagnostic modalities. IE pathophysiology is a unique model of immunothrombosis, and the clinical course is often complicated by either embolic or hemorrhagic events. Managing antithrombotic treatment is challenging and the level of supporting evidence scant. The aim of this review was to discuss and present the embolic and bleeding complication associated with IE and review the available evidence on antithrombotic treatment in patients with IE with and without a previous indication to antithrombotic drugs.

SUMMARY

Embolic events occur in 20-40% of patients with IE and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Acute ischemic stroke is the most common neurological complication. A beneficial effect of antithrombotic therapy in preventing ischemic stroke for patients with IE has never been formally tested in adequately powered randomized clinical trials. Atrial fibrillation is a common complication associated with severe infections, requiring anticoagulation. Furthermore, patients with IE have a high risk of unprovoked and anticoagulation treatment-related bleeding. In particular, intracerebral bleeding is the most severe complication in about 5% of patients with IE. Single antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin after hospitalization for IE has been shown to reduce causes mortality within 90 days without an increase of hemorrhagic strokes. In the absence of bleeding complications, recent guidelines recommend to maintain low-dose aspirin. No data are available on the management of patients with IE while on dual antiplatelet therapy.

KEY MESSAGES

Several gaps in knowledge remain about antithrombotic management in patients with IE and most of the evidence relies on observational studies. Individualized strategies based on clinical evaluation, comorbidities, patient engagement, and shared decisions strategies are encouraged.

Utilization trends and outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism in the US by race/ethnicity

Contemporary data on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) utilization trends and associated hospital outcomes in pulmonary embolism (PE) n the US is limited. Using the nationwide inpatient sample database, we identified patients hospitalized for acute PE treated with CDT from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Cochrane-Armitage test was used to evaluate the temporal trends in utilization, hospital mortality, and major bleeding rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare differences in the outcomes across race/ethnicity, 4444 patients (unweighted hospitalizations) underwent CDT during the study period. The mean age ± standard deviation of the population was 58 ± 16 years and the majority were males (54%). 3269 (73.6%) patients were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 802 (18.0%) patients were non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 373 (8.4%) patients were of 'other' races/ethnicities. There was a more than tenfold increase in CDT use in 2018 compared to 2008. The total mortality and bleeding rates were approximately 7 and 10% respectively. Hospital mortality rates trended down across all races/ethnicities during the study period. A similar downward trend in bleeding rates was noted in NHB only (28.6% vs 10.7%, p = 0.04). In-hospital mortality and major bleeding odds were comparable across all races/ethnicities were comparable. NHB patients and other races were more likely to require blood transfusion and incur higher hospitalization costs compared with NHW patients. CDT use increased significantly in the US during the study period with a corresponding downward trend in in-hospital mortality across all races, and bleeding rates in NHB.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Trends and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

IMPORTANCE

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a recognized complication of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) associated with poor prognosis. Although racial and ethnic disparities have been described in the occurrence and outcomes of PPCM, it is unclear if these disparities persist among patients with PPCM and CS.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the temporal trends in CS incidence among hospitalized patients with PPCM stratified by race and ethnicity and to investigate the racial and ethnic differences in hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use, and heart transplantation (HT).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with PPCM complicated by CS in the US from 2005 to 2019 identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Data analysis was conducted in November 2021.

EXPOSURE

PPCM complicated by CS.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was incidence of CS in PPCM stratified by race and ethnicity. The secondary outcome was racial and ethnic differences in hospital mortality, MCS use, and HT.

RESULTS

Of 55 804 hospitalized patients with PPCM, 1945 patients had CS, including 947 Black patients, 236 Hispanic patients, and 702 White patients, translating to an incidence rate of 35 CS events per 1000 patients with PPCM. The mean (SD) age was 31 (9) years. Black and Hispanic patients had higher CS incidence rates (39 events per 1000 patients with PPCM) compared with White patients (33 events per 1000 patients with PPCM). CS incidence rates significantly increased across all races and ethnicities over the study period. Overall, the odds of developing CS were higher in Black patients (aOR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.15-1.57]; P < .001) and Hispanic patients (aOR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.17-1.59]; P < 001) compared with White patients during the study period. Compared with White patients, the odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.67 [95% CI, 1.21-2.32]; P = .002) and Hispanic (aOR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.45-3.33]; P < .001) patients. Hispanic patients were more likely to receive any type of MCS device (aOR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.60-3.09]; P < .001), intraaortic balloon pump (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.44]; P < .001), and ventricular assisted device (aOR, 4.45 [95% CI, 2.45-8.08]; P < .001), compared with White patients. Black patients were more likely to receive VAD (aOR, 2.69 [95% CI, 1.63-4.42]; P < .001) compared with White patients. Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive HT compared with White patients (Black patients: aOR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33-0.78]; P = .02; Hispanic patients: aOR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.06-0.42]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings highlight significant racial disparities in mortality and HT among hospitalized patients with PPCM complicated by CS in the US. More research to identify factors of racial and ethnic disparities is needed to guide interventions to improve outcomes of patients with PPCM.