1
|
Pallapothu MR, Quintana Mariñez MG, Chakkera M, Ravi N, Ramaraju R, Vats A, Nair AR, Bandhu AK, Koirala D, Mohammed L. Long-Term Management of Migraine With OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) vs Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Antibodies (Anti-CGRP). Cureus 2023; 15:e46696. [PMID: 38021691 PMCID: PMC10630153 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In this literature review, we will evaluate the effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) in the treatment of migraine headaches. Both therapies are frequently prescribed for managing and preventing migraines and have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. The mechanism of action, side effects, compliance, cost-effectiveness, and migraine treatment provided by these two medicines were compared in the analysis of several studies. Many studies found that as Botox was administered by a doctor every three months and had fewer side effects than anti-CGRP, which is self-administered every month, it was more compliant than anti-CGRP. After examining the data, Botox is believed to be the most effective therapy. Although both therapies are efficient, this article compares them to determine which is the best management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj R Pallapothu
- Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- Neurology, Pontiac General Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | | | - Mohana Chakkera
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Niriksha Ravi
- Internal Medicine and Neurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Rajita Ramaraju
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Aastha Vats
- General Practice, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, IND
- Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Athira R Nair
- Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
- Internal Medicine, Pontiac General Hospital, Pontiac, USA
| | - Atithi K Bandhu
- Internal Medicine, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, NPL
- Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Divya Koirala
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| | - Lubna Mohammed
- Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lampl C, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Jassal T, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Reuter U, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Zeraatkar D, Sacco S. The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:56. [PMID: 37208596 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria.
- Headache Medical Center Linz, Linz, Austria.
| | | | | | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tanvir Jassal
- Department of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dena Zeraatkar
- Department of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L´Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahon R, Vo P, Pannagl K, Tiwari S, Heemstra H, Ferraris M, Zhao J, Betts KA, Proot P. Assessment of the relative effectiveness of erenumab compared with onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of chronic migraine. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:105-112. [PMID: 36189948 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2131299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the available clinical and economic evidence of erenumab vs onabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine (CM) and present de-novo indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) based on available clinical trial data. METHODS We conducted ITCs based on results from the pivotal 295 trial (NCT02066415) of erenumab vs placebo and published aggregate data from the PREEMPT 1 (NCT00156910) and PREEMPT 2 (NCT00168428) trials of onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo. ITCs were conducted for CM patients with and without prior administration of onabotulinumtoxinA and among CM patients with ≥3 prior preventive treatment failures. Efficacy was assessed based on responder rates of ≥50% reductions in monthly headache days (MHDs) and monthly migraine days (MMDs) as well as change from baseline in both MHDs and MMDs. RESULTS Among patients with CM, 140 mg erenumab was associated with a reduction of 1.2 MHD (p = .092) and a reduction of 1.0 MMD (p = .174) compared to onabotulinumtoxinA at Week 12. Among onabotulinumtoxinA-naïve patients, erenumab was associated with a reduction of 1.8 MHD (p = .026) and 1.4 MMD (p = .080) at Week 12. Among patients that had received ≥3 prior preventive treatments, the odds ratios comparing erenumab vs onabotulinumtoxinA were 1.7 for ≥50% responder rates based on reductions in MHD (p = .155) and 1.7 for ≥50% responder rates based on reductions in MMD (p = .140). CONCLUSION These findings suggest directional benefits (although not reaching the threshold of statistical significance) associated with erenumab vs onabotulinumtoxinA for the preventive treatment of CM. Evidence from this study may inform healthcare stakeholders in treatment selection and optimization for patients with CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pamela Vo
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Jing Zhao
- Analysis Group, Inc, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Lorenzo C, Ballerini G, Barbanti P, Bernardini A, D’Arrigo G, Egeo G, Frediani F, Garbo R, Pierangeli G, Prudenzano MP, Rebaudengo N, Semeraro G, Sirianni G, Valente M, Coppola G, Cervenka MC, Spera G. Applications of Ketogenic Diets in Patients with Headache: Clinical Recommendations. Nutrients 2021; 13:2307. [PMID: 34371817 PMCID: PMC8308539 DOI: 10.3390/nu13072307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Headaches are among the most prevalent and disabling neurologic disorders and there are several unmet needs as current pharmacological options are inadequate in treating patients with chronic headache, and a growing interest focuses on nutritional approaches as non-pharmacological treatments. Among these, the largest body of evidence supports the use of the ketogenic diet (KD). Exactly 100 years ago, KD was first used to treat drug-resistant epilepsy, but subsequent applications of this diet also involved other neurological disorders. Evidence of KD effectiveness in migraine emerged in 1928, but in the last several year's different groups of researchers and clinicians began utilizing this therapeutic option to treat patients with drug-resistant migraine, cluster headache, and/or headache comorbid with metabolic syndrome. Here we describe the existing evidence supporting the potential benefits of KDs in the management of headaches, explore the potential mechanisms of action involved in the efficacy in-depth, and synthesize results of working meetings of an Italian panel of experts on this topic. The aim of the working group was to create a clinical recommendation on indications and optimal clinical practice to treat patients with headaches using KDs. The results we present here are designed to advance the knowledge and application of KDs in the treatment of headaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherubino Di Lorenzo
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, 04100 Latina, Italy;
| | - Giovanna Ballerini
- Multidisciplinary Center for Pain Therapy, Piero Palagi Hospital, USL Toscana Centro, 50122 Florence, Italy;
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (P.B.); (G.E.)
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, San Raffaele University, 00163 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Bernardini
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Misericordia University Hospital, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (A.B.); (R.G.); (M.V.)
| | - Giacomo D’Arrigo
- Headache Center, Neurology & Stroke Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.)
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, 00163 Rome, Italy; (P.B.); (G.E.)
| | - Fabio Frediani
- Headache Center, Neurology & Stroke Unit, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (F.F.)
| | - Riccardo Garbo
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Misericordia University Hospital, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (A.B.); (R.G.); (M.V.)
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
- Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Prudenzano
- Headache Center, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | | | - Grazia Semeraro
- Associazione Eupraxia, Dietary Section, 00171 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (G.S.)
| | - Giulio Sirianni
- Associazione Eupraxia, Dietary Section, 00171 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (G.S.)
| | - Mariarosaria Valente
- Clinical Neurology Unit, Misericordia University Hospital, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy; (A.B.); (R.G.); (M.V.)
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria Della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Gianluca Coppola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, 04100 Latina, Italy;
| | - Mackenzie C. Cervenka
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA;
| | - Giovanni Spera
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|