Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing: A Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Cohort Study

Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing Patella in Total Knee Replacement: When and What to Choose

INTRODUCTION

The opinion on the necessity of patella resurfacing has been deeply divided in the scientific community. There are three approaches to the management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The first method involves always resurfacing the patella, the second method involves never resurfacing it, and the third method involves resurfacing the patella only under specific circumstances. Different data support each of these strategies, but no consensus on the best management has been reached.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 106 cases of TKA (including 29 resurfaced patellas and 77 non-resurfaced patellas), over 5 years, at the Trauma-Orthopedics Department of the Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco. Our objective is to conduct a comparative study between TKA with patella resurfacing and those without resurfacing, by analyzing the functional and radiological results obtained after the operation, to show each technique's advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS

The average age of our patients was 65 years with extremes ranging from 46 to 80 years. There was a clear female predominance with a sex ratio of 0.2. The left side was predominantly affected. Primary gonarthrosis was the main diagnosis. Our results showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient satisfaction and Knee Society Score (KSS). Nevertheless, complications generated by resurfacing, such as infection, anterior pain, stiffness, and loosening of the patellar component, as well as additional costs and increased operative time, were observed. In the majority of meta-analyses, there was no discernible difference in clinical and functional results between the resurfaced and non-resurfaced groups, suggesting that patellar resurfacing is not beneficial and, therefore, unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

It appears that regular resurfacing is not necessary. However, there is agreement that resurfacing the patella is the best course of action for patients with inflammatory arthropathy, considerable patella malalignment, and severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis. There are arguments in favor of each of the patella resurfacing techniques, but none of them are particularly compelling, each of these strategies has its advantages and should not be considered bad. The final decision, therefore, rests on each surgeon's practice, training, and experience.