Factors Associated With Pediatric Emergency Airway Management by the Difficult Airway Response Team

Preemptive airway management planning: A retrospective evaluation of the pediatric difficult airway consultation service

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The pediatric Difficult Airway Consultation Service (pDACS) was created in 2017 to identify patients with potentially difficult airways and create airway management plans prior to airway management.

METHODS

Consults were either nurse-initiated, physician-initiated, or both nurse-and-physician-initiated and were examined for demographic and clinical factors. If a child had difficult airway risk factors, a consult note with airway management recommendations was completed.

RESULTS

We included 419 consults from the 4-year study period for analysis. Sixty-one patients had chronic tracheostomies in place and thus, were analyzed separately. Of the remaining 358 consults, 50% (n = 179) were nurse-initiated, 30.2% (n = 108) physician-initiated, and 19.8% (n = 71) nurse-and-physician-initiated consults. Differences in observed frequency of airway edema (difference, 6.3%; 95%CI 0.1%-12.5%; p = .04), cleft lip/palate (difference, 8.1%; 95%CI 0.07%-16.3%, p = .04), craniofacial abnormalities (difference, 12.3%; 95%CI 1.9%-22.7%, p = .02), and trauma/burn (difference, 6.5%; 95%CI 0.09%-12.8%, p = .04) were calculated. Observed frequencies were higher in physician-initiated compared to nurse-initiated consults. Airway edema was also more prevalent in dual nurse-and-physician-initiated consults (difference, 8.7%; 95%CI 1.6%-15.8%; p = .01). Physician-initiated consults were associated with a greater proportion of high-risk difficult airways than nurse-initiated consults (difference, 26.7%; 95%CI 14.0%-39.4%, p < .001). Approximately 41.9% of patients at high-risk for having a difficult airway were identified by nurse-screening only. Using bag-valve-mask was often the primary ventilation recommendation (89.3%, n = 108) and supraglottic airway placement was the most common tertiary plan (74.2%, n = 83). Direct laryngoscopy (47.1%, n = 65) and videolaryngoscopy (40.6%, n = 56) were the most recommended modes of intubation. Three patients with airway emergencies had previously documented airway management plans and were successfully intubated without complications following the primary intubation technique recommended in their consult note.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, nurse-screening identified patients at high-risk for a difficult airway that would likely not have been identified prior to initiation of a screening protocol. Furthermore, airway management plans outlined prior to an emergent difficult airway event may increase first-attempt success at securing the difficult airway, reducing morbidity and mortality.

An analysis of a new rapid difficult airway response team in a vertically built children's hospital

BACKGROUND

Intrahospital transport is associated with adverse events. This challenge is amplified during airway management. Although difficult airway response teams have been described, little attention has been paid to patient transport during difficult airway management versus the alternative of managing patient airways without moving the patient. This is especially needed in a 22-floor vertical hospital.

HYPOTHESIS

Development of a rapid difficult airway response team and an associated difficult airway cart will allow for the ability to manage difficult airways in the patient's primary location.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all rapid difficult airway response activations from December 18, 2019 to December 31, 2021 was performed to determine the number of airways secured in the patient's primary location (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included length of time until airway securement, airway device used, number of attempts, complications, use of front of neck access, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 96 rapid difficult airway response activations in a 2-year period, with 18 activations deemed inappropriate. Of the 78 indicated rapid difficult airway response deployments, all activations resulted in a secure airway, and 76 (97.4%) of cases had an airway secured in the patient's primary location. The mean time to airway securement was 17.1 min (standard deviation 18.8 min). The most common methods of airway securement were direct laryngoscopy (42.3%, 33/78) and video laryngoscopy (29.5%, 23/78). The mean number of attempts by the rapid difficult airway response team was 1.4. There were no documented cases requiring front of neck access. The Cormack-Lehane airway grade at time of intubation was I-II in 83.3% (65/78) of activations. Rapid difficult airway response activation resulted in 16 cases of cardiac arrest and 4 patient deaths within 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

A rapid difficult airway response team allows a large majority of patients' airways to be managed and secured in the patient's primary hospital location. Future directions include reducing time to airway securement and identifying factors associated with cardiac arrest.