Relationship Between Medical Questionnaire and Influenza Rapid Test Positivity: Subjective Pretest Probability, "I Think I Have Influenza," Contributes to the Positivity Rate

Importance of History Taking and Physical Examination Before Rapid Laboratory Test for Seasonal Influenza Virus: A Single-Center Multiple Logistic Analysis

Background Despite several rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), they are predicting whether a patient has influenza before rapid testing is important. Here, we assessed factors predictive of a positive flu test via RIDTs by combining interviews and physical examination. Methods We analyzed the relationship between interviews and physical findings and results of RIDTs using multivariable logistic regression. Results Two hundred seventy-six children were enrolled throughout the 2018-2019 flu season. Accordingly, 115 patients (41.7%) were positive for flu A. Our logistic regression model identified age, body temperature, and the existence of upper respiratory symptoms as significant factors for predicting positive for RIDTs, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.17 [95% CI (confidence interval): 1.08-1.25]/+Δ1year old, 1.70 (95% CI: 1.27-2.27)/+Δ1 ℃, and 5.08 (95% CI: 2.57-10.00) for respiratory symptoms. In addition, the OR for sick contact was 7.67 (95% CI: 3.96-14.90). Our logistic regression model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84. History of vaccination was not identified as a significant factor in positive RIDTs. Conclusions The existence of sick contact was associated with a positive flu test via RIDTs. Although RIDTs are an easy and quick method for detecting the flu virus, we should perform the appropriate identification of cases for RIDTs by combining interviews and physical findings.