Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review

Transoral Robotic-Assisted Neurosurgery for Skull Base and Upper Spine Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The application of the da Vinci Surgical System in neurosurgery is limited due to technical difficulties requiring precise maneuvers and small instruments. This study details the advantages and disadvantages of robotics in neurosurgery and the reachable range of the transoral approach to lesions of the skull base and upper cervical spine.

METHODS

In a cadaver study, the da Vinci Xi robot, lacking haptic feedback, was utilized for sagittal and coronal approaches on 5 heads, facilitating dura suturing in 3, with a 30°-angled drill for bone removal.

RESULTS

Perfect exposure of all the nasopharyngeal sites, clivus, sellar, and choana, including the bilateral eustachian tubes, was achieved without any external incisions using this palatal split approach of transoral robotic surgery. The time required to perform a single stitch, knot, and complete single suture in robotic suturing of deep-seated were significantly less compared to manual suturing via the endonasal approach.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to show the feasibility of suturing the dural defect in deep-seated lesions transorally and revealed that the limit of reach in the coronal plane via a transoral approach with incision of the soft palate is the foramen ovale. This preclinical investigation also showed that the transoral robotic approach is feasible for lesions extending from the sellar to the C2 in the sagittal plane. Refinement of robotic instruments for specific anatomic sites and future neurosurgical studies are needed to further demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this system in treating benign and malignant skull base lesions.

Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications

Background Uterine weight is an important factor in determining the complexity of a hysterectomy. Although greater uterine weight increases operative time and blood loss in open or laparoscopic surgery, it remains uncertain whether this applies to robot-assisted hysterectomy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of uterine weight on the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted hysterectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 872 patients who underwent robot-assisted hysterectomies at our institution between January 2019 and June 2022. Of these, 724 cases were analyzed and classified into four groups based on uterine weight: <250 g (377 patients), 250-500 g (253 patients), 500-750 g (69 patients), and ≥750 g (25 patients). We performed univariate analysis with the following endpoints: operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rate, conversion to laparotomy rate, and blood transfusion rate. Results Operating time and blood loss increased significantly with greater uterine weight in the four groups (both p-values <0.01), but postoperative hospital stay and complication rate did not increase (p = 0.448, p = 0.679, respectively). None of the patients underwent conversion to laparotomy or blood transfusion. Conclusion Although the operating time for robot-assisted hysterectomy and blood loss increased with greater uterine weight, the complications and length of postoperative hospital stay were similar between groups. Robot-assisted hysterectomy is safe in cases of much uterine weight.

Surgical Frontiers: A Comparative Review of Robotics Versus Laparoscopy in Gynecological Interventions

This review comprehensively examines the current state and future directions of gynecological surgery, focusing on the comparative analysis of laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The overview highlights the evolution of these surgical techniques, emphasizing their impact on patient outcomes, procedural efficiency, and safety profiles. The analysis encompasses critical factors such as cost-effectiveness, learning curves, and implications for postoperative recovery. The future of gynecological surgery is envisioned through emerging technologies, including augmented reality, single-incision laparoscopy, and artificial intelligence. The coexistence of laparoscopy and robotics is explored, acknowledging their respective strengths and roles in shaping women's healthcare. In conclusion, the dynamic nature of the field is underscored, emphasizing the need for a patient-centered and adaptable approach. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, engineers, and researchers is pivotal in unlocking these innovations' full potential, ensuring continued advancements in gynecological surgery for improved outcomes and enhanced patient care.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus

We compared the effectiveness of conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) against robot-assisted total hysterectomy (RAH) in patients with a large uterus. According to the subtype of minimally invasive hysterectomy performed for benign indications, the patients (n = 843) were grouped as follows: TLH (n = 340) and RAH (n = 503). The median operative time (OT) for TLH was 98 min (47-406 min), and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 50 mL (5-1800 mL). The median OT for RAH was 90 min (43-251 min), and the EBL was 5 mL (5-850 mL), with a significantly shorter OT and a lower EBL in RAH than in TLH. Uterine weight was categorized into four groups in increments of 250 g. The number of cases in each group was 163 (< 250 g), 116 (250-500 g), 41 (500-750 g), and 20 (≥ 750 g) for TLH, and 308 (< 250 g), 137 (250-500 g), 33 (500-750 g), and 25 (≥ 750 g) for RAH. In patients with a uterus < 250 g, there was no significant difference in OT between TLH and RAH, but in patients with a uterus ≥ 250 g, OT tended to be shorter with RAH, which was also true for a uterus ≥ 750 g. The EBL was significantly lower with RAH compared to TLH, regardless of uterine weight. In patients with a large uterus, the advantages of robotic surgery can be utilized, which may lead to a shorter OT and less EBL.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort study

We compared the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RAH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). This single-center cohort study compared 139 RAH cases from January, 2017 to September, 2021 and 291 TLH cases between January, 2015 and December, 2020. We retrospectively evaluated surgical outcomes, including total operative time (defined as the time from port wound incision to port wound closure), net operative time (defined as the time from the start of pneumoperitoneum to the end of pneumoperitoneum), estimated blood loss, weight of excised uterus (±adnexa), and overall complications, and the relationship between surgeon experience and operative time, net operative time, and blood loss in RAH and TLH. There was no significant difference in the total operative time between the two groups. Regardless of surgeon experience, the net operative time was significantly shorter in the RAH group than in the TLH group (p <0.001) and the estimated blood loss was significantly lower in RAH cases than in TLH cases (p = 0.01). The net operative time per uterine weight was shorter in the TLH group than that in the RAH group; however, there was no significant difference. RAH resulted in statistically better surgical outcomes in terms of net operative time and blood loss, regardless of surgeon experience. However, net operative time and blood loss also seem to be significantly affected by uterus weight. Large trials are imperative to determine the more effective surgical approach between RAH and TLH for different patient subsets.

Uterine Weight and Perioperative Morbidity in Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Background and Objectives

Minimally invasive approaches to benign hysterectomy are the current standard of care when feasible. Use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RA-LH) has been increasing; however, direct comparative data that accounts for uterine weight in conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH) and RA-LH is limited. We sought to examine the impact of uterine weight on immediate perioperative morbidity in CLH versus RA-LH. The primary outcome was a composite of complications including visceral injuries, conversions to abdominal procedures, and transfusions.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy (CLH and RA-LH) in a single hospital system between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 as identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. The primary exposure was CLH or RA-LH. Uterine weight was categorized into four groups: <150 g, 150 to < 250 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g.

Results

A total of 1506 patients were included; 539 underwent CLH and 967 underwent RA-LH. Median uterine weight was higher in patients who underwent CLH (161.0 g) compared to RA-LH (147.0 g), P = .001. The odds of the composite of complications in CLH was 4.43 (2.84 - 6.92) higher than the odds of the composite in RA-LH. When stratified by the uterine weight, the odds of complications was significantly higher in CLH in the following categories: <150 g, 250 to < 450 g, and ≥ 450 g (OR: 4.41, 3.28, and 7.81, respectively).

Conclusion

Surgical morbidity was lower in RA-LH across the spectrum of uterine weights compared to CLH. Patients may particularly benefit from RA-LH at higher uterine weights.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia use between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Although robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomies are widely used as minimally invasive procedures, consensus on which is superior regarding lesser postoperative pain is lacking. This study determines whether there is a difference in the proportion of postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen between robotic and laparoscopic total hysterectomies. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic total hysterectomy for uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 at a hospital between July 2016 and November 2021. The outcome was postoperative analgesics (i.e., NSAIDs or acetaminophen) use. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the procedure and outcome. Adjusted variables were age, body mass index, surgeon's laparoscopic technique certification, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and wound local anesthesia. Of 127 patients, 3 were excluded, and 124 were included. Robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in 38 and 86 patients, respectively. Postoperative analgesics were administered to 10 (26.3%) and 52 (60.5%) patients in the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis showed significantly more frequent analgesics use in the laparoscopy group (odds ratio [OR] 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-9.93; p < 0.01). Adjusted logistic regression analysis did not detect significant differences (OR 2.62; 95% CI 0.91-7.56; p = 0.07). No significant difference in the proportion of postoperative analgesia was observed between robotic total hysterectomy and laparoscopy. Future studies must include larger sample sizes and aligned intraoperative and postoperative analgesic management.