1
|
Schuster NM, Wallace MS, Marcotte TD, Buse DC, Lee E, Liu L, Sexton M. Vaporized Cannabis versus Placebo for Acute Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.16.24302843. [PMID: 38405890 PMCID: PMC10889030 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.16.24302843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Background Preclinical and retrospective studies suggest cannabinoids may be effective in migraine treatment. However, there have been no randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of cannabinoids for acute migraine. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, adults with migraine treated up to 4 separate migraine attacks, 1 each with vaporized 1) 6% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-dominant); 2) 11% cannabidiol (CBD-dominant); 3) 6% THC+11% CBD; and 4) placebo cannabis flower in a randomized order. Washout period between treated attack was ≥1 week. The primary endpoint was pain relief and secondary endpoints were pain freedom and most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, all assessed at 2 hours post-vaporization. Results Ninety-two participants were enrolled and randomized, and 247 migraine attacks were treated. THC+CBD was superior to placebo at achieving pain relief (67.2% vs 46.6%, Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] 2.85 [1.22, 6.65], p=0.016), pain freedom (34.5% vs. 15.5%, 3.30 [1.24, 8.80], p=0.017) and MBS freedom (60.3% vs. 34.5%, 3.32 [1.45, 7.64], p=0.005) at 2 hours, as well as sustained pain freedom at 24 hours and sustained MBS freedom at 24 and 48 hours. THC-dominant was superior to placebo for pain relief (68.9% vs. 46.6%, 3.14 [1.35, 7.30], p=0.008) but not pain freedom or MBS freedom at 2 hours. CBD-dominant was not superior to placebo for pain relief, pain freedom or MBS freedom at 2 hours. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusions Acute migraine treatment with 6% THC+11% CBD was superior to placebo at 2 hours post-treatment with sustained benefits at 24 and 48 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel M. Schuster
- Center for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Mark S. Wallace
- Center for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Thomas D. Marcotte
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Dawn C. Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
| | - Euyhyun Lee
- Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Michelle Sexton
- Centers for Integrative Health, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California, San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hidding U, Mainka T, Buhmann C. Therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurological diseases: a clinical update. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2024; 131:117-126. [PMID: 38015317 PMCID: PMC10791790 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-023-02719-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The use of medical Cannabis has increased in recent years due to changing legal circumstances in many countries. Approval exists only for a few neurological conditions such as rare forms of epilepsy or spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Beyond that, however, medical Cannabis is used for a wide range of neurological conditions and symptoms. In Germany, in parallel with new legislation that has simplified the prescription of medical Cannabis, an accompanying survey has been implemented for which initial data are now available. In this context, our review provides an overview of the evidence for the therapeutic use of medical Cannabis in neurology, the potential benefits, and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Hidding
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tina Mainka
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology at the Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Buhmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paladini A, Gharibo C, Khalbous S, Salti A, Ergönenç T, Pasqualucci A, Varrassi G. Looking Back, Moving Forward in Pain Medicine. Cureus 2023; 15:e44716. [PMID: 37809214 PMCID: PMC10552787 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain is an ancient medical complaint and a clinical riddle that has never been entirely solved. Looking back into history was the springboard to a look into the future of pain medicine. This article was based on a series of presentations given in a recent congress (May 2023) and represents the research, views, and opinions of the authors. Opium has been used for millennia to treat pain, but when it gained broad use in the United States in the 1980s and 1990s, it was so vastly overprescribed and mis-prescribed that it led to a public health crisis. This, in turn, led to the reaction where opioids at times were under-prescribed, leaving out many patients who may have benefited from opioids while leaving many legacy pain patients to manage withdrawal on their own and with few analgesic options. Cannabinoids (CB) were likewise widely used for various conditions, including pain, but were outlawed in the 20th century, only to be brought back as a potential analgesic agent. Interventional pain medicine is a developing discipline and has reinforced the concept of the interdisciplinary pain clinic. It plays an increasingly important part in modern medicine overall, especially with the support of ultrasound, for both diagnosis and therapy. Today, the views about pain have changed. Anyone has accepted that pain is not purely a physical phenomenon but a biopsychosocial phenomenon that occurs within a cultural context. Pain management remains a small but vitally important medical subspecialty that is critical from a functional enablement and population health perspective, which is helping to navigate new therapeutic targets, new drugs and routes of administration, greater understanding of pain psychology, and new technologies. Pain control today means early intervention, functional enablement through pain alleviation, educating patients about pain management, and minimizing the transition from acute to chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Paladini
- Life, Health, and Environmental Sciences (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | - Christopher Gharibo
- Pain Management, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, New York City, USA
| | | | - Ammar Salti
- Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, ARE
| | - Tolga Ergönenç
- Anesthesia and Reanimation, Morphological Madrid Research Center, Madrid, ESP
- Anesthesia and Reanimation, Akyazi Hospital Pain and Palliative Care, Sakarya, TUR
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guerra J, Naidoo V, Cacabelos R. Potential effects of cannabinoids on audiovestibular function: A narrative review. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1010296. [PMID: 36605398 PMCID: PMC9807921 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1010296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The growing interest in the development of drugs that target the endocannabinoid system has extended to conditions that affect the audiovestibular pathway. The expression of cannabinoid (CB) receptors in that pathway has been widely demonstrated, indicating a therapeutic potential for drug development at this level. These medications may be beneficial for conditions such as noise-induced hearing loss, ototoxicity, or various forms of vertigo of central or peripheral origin. The therapeutic targets of interest include natural or synthetic compounds that act as CB1/CB2 receptor agonists/antagonists, and inhibitors of the endocannabinoid-degrading enzymes FAAH and MAGL. Furthermore, genetic variations implicated in the response to treatment and the development of related disorders such as epilepsy or migraine have been identified. Direct methods of administering these medications should be examined beyond the systemic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquin Guerra
- Neuro-Otolaryngology Unit, EuroEspes Biomedical Research Center, Institute of Medical Science and Genomic Medicine, Bergondo, Corunna, Spain,*Correspondence: Joaquin Guerra,
| | - Vinogran Naidoo
- Department of Neuroscience, International Center of Neuroscience and Genomic Medicine, EuroEspes Biomedical Research Center, Bergondo, Corunna, Spain
| | - Ramon Cacabelos
- Genomic Medicine, EuroEspes Biomedical Research Center, Institute of Medical Science and Genomic Medicine, Bergondo, Corunna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosa LMM, Siega MRDA. Enxaqueca de alta frequência refratária a tratamento farmacológico usual e anticorpo e responsiva a canabidiol de amplo espectro: relato de caso. HEADACHE MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.48208/headachemed.2022.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
O uso de derivados da Cannabis sp. no tratamento de certas condições médicas, como dor neuropática, epilepsia e esclerose múltipla já é bem conhecido. Porém, estudos sobre seu benefício em cefaleias ainda são de baixa abrangência, sendo constituídos, em sua maior parte, por relatos e séries de casos. Apresentamos o caso de paciente masculino de 74 anos, portador de enxaqueca de alta frequência (2 a 3 vezes/semana) há vários anos, com importante limitação funcional associada a diversos gatilhos, fazendo uso apenas de triptanos durante as crises. Apresentou intolerância a 2 medicamentos profiláticos (topiramato e propranolol). Realizou 2 aplicações de Erenumabe 70 mg, havendo considerável melhora inicial seguida de novo aumento na frequência das crises após a segunda aplicação, com interrupção do tratamento. Fez uso de nutracêuticos por 6 meses, sem grande melhora. Após introdução de óleo de canabidiol, as crises reduziram em frequência (1 episódio/mês) e intensidade, com intervalo recorde de 30 dias seguidos sem dor, associado a eliminação de gatilhos. Estudos pré-clínicos avaliando a relação entre o sistema endocanabinoide e a fisiopatologia da migrânea apontam para os derivados da Cannabis sp. como potenciais armas para o tratamento dessa condição. No entanto, o papel desses derivados como profilaxia das crises de enxaqueca ainda é especulativo, necessitando de estudos controlados para maior definição.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Forty-one US jurisdictions (37 states) have legalized comprehensive medical cannabis programs since 1996. The number of qualifying conditions per jurisdiction varies from 5 to 29. Five (12%) of 42 qualifying conditions have conclusive or substantial evidence of efficacy and are listed in more than half of all jurisdictions. Half (50%) of qualifying conditions have no or insufficient scientific evidence of benefit from medical cannabis; 9% of qualifying conditions have limited evidence of harm from medical cannabis. The mean number of qualifying conditions per jurisdiction and the proportion of conditions with and without evidence of benefit have not changed since 1996.
Collapse
|
7
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Khatib M, Knafo J, Karas M, Krupa K, Rivera B, Macia A, Madhu B, McMillan M, Burtch J, Quinonez J, Albert T, Khanna D. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and the Management of Headaches: A Scoping Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e27830. [PMID: 36110479 PMCID: PMC9462953 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Headaches have been studied and treated since nearly 7,000 BC because of their significant global impact. Current headache treatment modalities are various and have a wide variety of targets, but medications are the most common. Since conventional medical treatments have several side effects, alternative remedies such as osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) should be considered. OMT can assist in the management of various health conditions, such as low back pain, neck pain, and headaches. The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate recent findings regarding the efficacy of OMT modalities in the management of headaches such as tension-type headaches (TTH) and migraines. This study was designed as a scoping review to gather evidence on the efficacy of OMT modalities in the management of headaches. Following PRISMA guidelines, four databases were used to search for articles published between 2010 and 2022 that reported the use of OMT and manual therapy for TTH and migraines. Databases used include Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science. The following keywords were used: treatment, therapy, Headache, migraine, craniosacral, muscle energy, myofascial release, trigger point, osteopathic, and manipulation. The initial search yielded 473 unique articles after removing duplicates. After screening based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and after further analysis, 15 articles were selected. Data reports of OMT and manual therapy efficacy and/or effectiveness in treating TTH and migraine were analyzed. Articles included were randomized control studies (13 of 15, 86.6%), one pilot study (one of 15, 6.7%), and one case series (one of 15, 6.7%), which were divided into TTH (nine of 15, 60%) and Migraine Headaches (six of 15, 40%). All articles reported significant headache improvement in at least one measurement. Of all treatments analyzed, single technique interventions (seven of 15, 47%) and multiple technique interventions (eight of 15, 53%) were identified. Among the techniques used, Myofascial Release was the most common (nine of 15, 60%). The articles presented provide evidence of the significant benefits of manual therapy. Because of the limitations of traditional medicine, OMT can be used either as an alternative or adjuvant therapy for headaches. Evidence suggests the positive impact it can provide on headache management, but the number of randomized control trials and population samples should be increased to support its recommendation. This demonstrates how different osteopathic techniques can provide therapeutic effects on TTH, MH, and potentially other types of headaches. A preference for myofascial release was observed, which can be due to the fast relief from the physiologic effect on tissue movement. This review study demonstrates the benefits OMT has on decreasing headache frequency, intensity, and duration in TTH and migraines. OMT has shown to be beneficial, especially for patients seeking alternative non-pharmaceutical and non-invasive treatments. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of different OMT techniques, and different combinations of treatments, on other types of headaches.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jacobs RJ, Kane MN. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Medical Students’ Perceptions of Medical Cannabis Scale. Cureus 2022; 14:e25749. [PMID: 35812569 PMCID: PMC9270071 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are few published research articles investigating medical students’ perceptions of medical cannabis (MC), including their attitudes toward its efficacy and appropriateness in medicine, concerns for potential adverse effects, and their willingness to prescribe it to patients (in future practice). This research investigated the factor structure of a tool to assess medical students’ perceptions of MC for the purpose of curriculum enhancement. Methods Using a voluntary electronic survey, quantitative data were collected between January and March 2022 from 526 medical students enrolled in a large medical school in Florida, United States. A 32-item questionnaire developed by the researchers was used to investigate medical students’ perceptions of MC. The survey was anonymous and took about 10 minutes to complete. Bivariate correlation analyses were conducted prior to performing a principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Results Using principal component analysis with varimax rotation, three factors were identified with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and a cumulative variance of 59.694%. These factors are perceived knowledge of MC, concern for possible adverse effects of MC (e.g., the potential for misuse/dependence), and attitudes toward MC (e.g., cannabis having an acceptable role in medicine, willingness (as a future physician) to help patients access MC, obtaining training about MC in school and residency training, the physician’s role as a prescriber, and efficacy and benefits of MC for certain health conditions). Conclusions The development of this kind of brief measure may be valuable for defining the future educational needs of medical students and other health professionals as well as a tool for future research.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jacobs RJ, Kane MN, Caballero J. Predictors of Medical Students’ Perceptions About Medical Cannabis. Cureus 2022; 14:e24390. [PMID: 35619867 PMCID: PMC9126474 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There has been a recent uptick in interest regarding the therapeutic properties of cannabis. Evidence exists to support the role of medical cannabis (MC) in chronic illness management for conditions such as posttraumatic stress, pain, and cancer. The majority of physicians in the United States report not knowing how to prescribe or answer questions about MC and receive minimal education about it during training. As MC becomes more socially acceptable with federal legalization in process, new physicians will encounter patients looking for information on the utility and safety of MC. The goal of this research was thus to assess the perceived knowledge, beliefs, and perceptions of medical students towards MC, and to obtain a better understanding of factors that may influence their attitudes. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study design was used to investigate the medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding MC. Quantitative data were collected from 526 medical students (years one to four) via an anonymous, online, 32-item questionnaire to determine if perceived knowledge, concerns about the potential negative effects of cannabis, and certain beliefs would significantly contribute to their attitudes toward MC. Hypothesis testing was conducted using Spearman-rank order correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses. Results: A statistically significant regression equation was found: (F(4, 428)=114.826, p<.001 with an R2=0.518 [adjusted R2 =0.513]) indicating greater perception of knowledge about MC, lower concern for possible negative effects of MC use, greater belief in federal legalization of MC, and greater belief in the federal legalization of recreational cannabis significantly contributed to a higher score on positive attitudes and perceptions toward MC. Moreover, while many participants reported physicians should be able to prescribe MC, they reported that little if any MC education had been provided. Conclusions: This study identified the knowledge, concerns, and perceptions of medical students regarding MC as well as several factors contributing to their attitudes about it. Favorable attitudes toward MC among patients exist and as its popularity and acceptance among patients continue, more may be asking their physicians about symptomatic and curative treatment with cannabis-based products. Results from this research have the potential to assist medical educators in understanding students’ perceptions about MC to help guide innovative and contemporary curricular advances as a public health imperative.
Collapse
|
10
|
Clinical Evidence of Cannabinoids in Migraine: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061479. [PMID: 35329806 PMCID: PMC8949974 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) influences many biological functions, and hence, its pharmacological modulation may be useful for several disorders, such as migraine. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the ECS is involved in the modulation of trigeminal excitability. Additionally, clinical data have suggested that an endocannabinoid deficiency is associated with migraine. Given these data, phytocannabinoids, as well as synthetic cannabinoids, have been tried as migraine treatments. In this narrative review, the current clinical evidence of potential ECS involvement in migraine pathogenesis is summarized. Furthermore, studies exploring the clinical effects of phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids on migraine patients are reviewed.
Collapse
|