1
|
Bergeron E, Doyon T, Manière T, Désilets É. Delay for cholecystectomy after common bile duct clearance with ERCP is just running after recurrent biliary event. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9546-9555. [PMID: 37726412 PMCID: PMC10709473 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10423-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallstone disease will affect 15% of the adult population with concomitant common bile duct stone (CBDS) occurring in up to 30%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the mainstay of management for removal of CBDS, as cholecystectomy for the prevention of recurrent biliary event (RBE). RBE occurs in up to 47% if cholecystectomy is not done. The goal of this study was to evaluate the timing of occurrence of RBE after common bile duct clearance with ERCP and associated outcomes. METHODS The records of all patients who underwent ERCP for gallstone disease followed by cholecystectomy, in a single center from 2010 to 2022, were reviewed. All RBE were identified. Actuarial incidence of RBE was built. Patients with and without RBE were compared. RESULTS The study population is composed of 529 patients. Mean age was 58.0 (18-95). There were 221 RBE in 151 patients (28.5%), 39/151 (25.8%) having more than one episode. The most frequent RBE was acute cholecystitis (n = 104) followed by recurrent CBDS (n = 95). Median time for first RBE was 34 days. Actuarial incidence of RBE started from 2.5% at 7 days to reach 53.3% at 1 year. Incidence-rate of RBE was 2.9 per 100 person-months. Patients with RBE had significant longer hospitalisation time (11.7 vs 6.4 days; P < 0.0001), longer operative time (66 vs 48 min; P < 0.0001), longer postoperative stay (2.9 vs 0.9 days; P < 0.0001), higher open surgery rate (7.9% vs 1.3%; P < 0.0001), and more complicated pathology (23.8% vs 5.8%; P < 0.0001) and cholecystitis (64.2% vs 25.9%; P < 0.0001) as final diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS RBE occurred in 28.5% of the subjects at a median time of 34 days, with an incidence of 2.5% as early as 1 week. Cholecystectomy should be done preferably within 7 days after common bile duct clearance in order to prevent RBE and adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Bergeron
- Department of Surgery, Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, 3120, Boulevard Taschereau, Greenfield Park, QC, J4V 2H1, Canada.
| | - Théo Doyon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada
| | - Thibaut Manière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada
| | - Étienne Désilets
- Department of Gastroenterology, Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergeron E, Doyon T, Manière T, Désilets É. Cholecystectomy following endoscopic clearance of common bile duct during the same admission. Can J Surg 2023; 66:E477-E484. [PMID: 37734850 PMCID: PMC10521812 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.008322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recurrence of common bile duct stones and other biliary events after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is frequent. Despite recommendations for early cholecystectomy, intervention during the same admission is carried out inconsistently. METHODS We reviewed the records of patients who underwent ERCP for gallstone disease and common bile duct clearance followed by cholecystectomy between July 2012 and June 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the index group underwent cholecystectomy during the same admission and the delayed group was discharged and had their cholecystectomy postponed. Data on demographics and prognosis factors were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The study population was composed of 268 patients, with 71 (26.6%) having undergone cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance with ERCP. A greater proportion of patients aged 80 years and older were in the index group than in the delayed group. The American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in the index group. There was no significant difference between groups regarding surgical complications, open cholecystectomy and death. The operative time was significantly longer in the delayed group. Among patients with delayed cholecystectomy, 18.3% had at least 1 recurrence of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and 38.6% had recurrence of any gallstone-related events before cholecystectomy. None of these events occurred in the the index group. There was no difference in the recurrence of CBDS and other biliary events after initial diagnosis associated with stone disease. CONCLUSION Cholecystectomy during the same admission after common bile duct clearance is safe, even in older adults with comorbidities. Compared with delayed cholecystectomy, it was not associated with adverse outcomes and may have prevented recurrence of biliary events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Bergeron
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Bergeron); Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Doyon, Maniere, Desilets)
| | - Théo Doyon
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Bergeron); Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Doyon, Maniere, Desilets)
| | - Thibaut Manière
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Bergeron); Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Doyon, Maniere, Desilets)
| | - Étienne Désilets
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Bergeron); Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Greenfield Park, Que. (Doyon, Maniere, Desilets)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson GGRJ, Dhaliwal S, Launcelott S, Hyun E, Helewa R, Shariff F, Hochman D. Ruptured Middle Colic Artery Aneurysm Presenting with Symptoms of Acute Cholecystitis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Int Med Case Rep J 2022; 15:761-768. [PMID: 36597475 PMCID: PMC9805738 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s372294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ruptured middle colic artery aneurysm is extremely uncommon. Diagnosis can be challenging, as symptomatology can be attributed to more common abdominal pathologies. Due to the rarity of this condition, only case reports are available to inform management. Case Presentation We present the case of a 72-year-old woman with a ruptured middle colic artery aneurysm presenting with signs and symptoms more suggestive of acute calculous cholecystitis. Her co-existing bleed was confirmed on CT angiogram. Coil embolization was initially attempted unsuccessfully. She underwent laparotomy, a middle colic artery ligation, and extended right hemicolectomy with intra-aortic balloon placement for emergency proximal vascular control. Post-operatively, she had a re-bleed that was successfully managed with covered stent placement in the proximal superior mesenteric artery after an unsuccessful re-attempt at coil embolization. Her apparent associated cholecystitis was managed with antibiotics and resolved uneventfully. Conclusion A middle colic artery aneurysm can be challenging to diagnose and treat. Management options include endovascular techniques, open surgery, or a combination approach. Intra-aortic balloon placement for emergency vascular control is a novel approach that could avoid hemorrhage when intra-abdominal vascular access is challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett G R J Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Surinder Dhaliwal
- Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sebastian Launcelott
- Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Eric Hyun
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ramzi Helewa
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Farhana Shariff
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David Hochman
- Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada,Correspondence: David Hochman, Department of Surgery, Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, 343 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A5, Canada, Tel +1 204-925-9592, Fax +1 204-231-2283, Email
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mori Y, Okawara M, Fujimoto K, Oba T, Sato N, Kohi S, Tamura T, Nagata J, Fujino Y, Fushimi K, Matsuda S, Shibao K, Hirata K. Evaluation of cholecystectomy in older individuals using real-world data: a multilevel analysis based on a nationwide administrative database in Japan. J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:433-440. [PMID: 35412148 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01873-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cholecystectomy in older individuals. METHODS In this retrospective study, data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database on 96,620 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy at 1060 hospitals from 2018 to 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into five age groups: < 75, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥ 90 years. Associations between postoperative outcomes and age group were investigated by logistic regression analysis. Mean differences between age groups in time to postoperative recovery and cost were also compared. RESULTS Older patients had higher rates of poor scores for activities of daily living and preoperative comorbidity. Compared with the youngest age group (< 75 years), the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality were 3.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.74-5.19), 7.54 (4.73-12.01), 13.47 (8.21-22.14), and 27.64 (15.56-49.09), in the 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥ 90-year-old age group, respectively (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, the length of postoperative hospital stay and rates of postoperative complications, postoperative reintubation, and reoperation with general anesthesia increased significantly in parallel with increasing age, the highest rates being in the ≥ 90 year-old age group. CONCLUSIONS Our real-world data highlight the worse postoperative outcomes, including a higher mortality rate, in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Care should be taken when considering the indications for surgery in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhisa Mori
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
| | - Makoto Okawara
- Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kenji Fujimoto
- Occupational Health Data Science Center, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takuya Oba
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Norihiro Sato
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Shiro Kohi
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Toshihisa Tamura
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Jun Nagata
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Fujino
- Department of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Matsuda
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazunori Shibao
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| | - Keiji Hirata
- Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|