The Role of MicroRNA 181d as a Possible Biomarker Associated With Tumor Progression in Meningiomas

MicroRNAs in meningiomas: Potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets

Meningiomas, characterized primarily as benign intracranial or spinal tumors, present distinctive challenges due to their variable clinical behavior, with certain cases exhibiting aggressive features linked to elevated morbidity and mortality. Despite their prevalence, the underlying molecular mechanisms governing the initiation and progression of meningiomas remain insufficiently understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small endogenous non-coding RNAs orchestrating post-transcriptional gene expression, have garnered substantial attention in this context. They emerge as pivotal biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets, offering innovative avenues for managing meningiomas. Recent research delves into the intricate mechanisms by which miRNAs contribute to meningioma pathogenesis, unraveling the molecular complexities of this enigmatic tumor. Meningiomas, originating from arachnoid meningothelial cells and known for their gradual growth, constitute a significant portion of intracranial tumors. The clinical challenge lies in comprehending their progression, particularly factors associated with brain invasion and heightened recurrence rates, which remain elusive. This comprehensive review underscores the pivotal role of miRNAs, accentuating their potential to advance our comprehension of meningioma biology. Furthermore, it suggests promising directions for developing diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic interventions, holding the promise of markedly improved patient outcomes in the face of this intricate and variable disease.

Noncoding RNA landscape and their emerging roles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in meningioma

Meningiomas are among the most prevalent primary CNS tumors in adults, accounting for nearly 38% of all brain neoplasms. The World Health Organization (WHO) grade assigned to meningiomas guides medical care in patients and is primarily based on tumor histology and malignancy potential. Although often considered benign, meningiomas with complicated histology, limited accessibility for surgical resection, and/or higher malignancy potential (WHO grade 2 and WHO grade 3) are harder to combat, resulting in significant morbidity. With limited treatment options and no systemic therapies, it is imperative to understand meningioma tumorigenesis at the molecular level and identify novel therapeutic targets. The last decade witnessed considerable progress in understanding the noncoding RNA landscape of meningioma, with microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) emerging as molecular entities of interest. This review aims to highlight the commonly dysregulated miRNAs and lncRNAs in meningioma and their correlation with meningioma progression, malignancy, recurrence, and radioresistance. The role of "key" miRNAs as biomarkers and their therapeutic potential has also been reviewed in detail. Furthermore, current and emerging therapeutic modalities for meningioma have been discussed, with emphasis on the need to identify and subsequently employ clinically relevant miRNAs and lncRNAs as novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers.

miR-497 and 219 in blood aid meningioma classification

INTRODUCTION

The current WHO classification and methylation status help predict meningioma recurrence and prognosis. However, up to date, there is no circulating biomarker showing clinical value in meningioma diagnosis or classification. Circulating miRNAs showed the potential to be used as cancer biomarkers in various tumours. This research evaluated specific miRNAs, miR-497 and miR-219, as convenient and efficient predictors of meningioma grades.

METHODS

We studied serum and exosomal levels of miR-497 in 74 meningioma samples (WHO grade I = 25, WHO grade II = 25, and WHO grade III = 24) and 53 healthy controls. The serum level of miR-219 was studied in 56 meningioma samples WHO grade I = 22, WHO grade II = 14, and WHO grade III = 20). We used qPCR for miRNA quantification. We also tested two different normalisers, endogenous and external, and evaluated their impact on the diagnostic value of miR-497.

RESULTS

The serum and exosomal levels of miR-497 distinguished meningioma from the control samples. Moreover, miR-497 was a suitable identifier for meningioma grade. When we combined miR-497 and miR-219, the efficacy of the combined biomarker was higher than miR-497 or miR-219 when used individually in meningioma classification. Both miR-497 and miR-219 showed a noticeable change with the methylation class of meningioma.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that serum miR-497 is an effective and easy-to-measure biomarker for meningioma diagnosis and classification. Moreover, when we combined miR-497 and miR-219, the combined biomarker showed enhanced accuracy in meningioma classification. Furthermore, this is the first study to evaluate the correlation between serum circulating miRNA and the methylation status in meningioma.