Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review

Comparison of Mortality and Postoperative Complications Between Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: An Umbrella Review

Background: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is one of the common complications of peptic ulcers. Open repair (OR) is the traditional surgical treatment for this condition, but with advances in laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic repair (LR) has gained popularity. Many studies have compared the effectiveness of OR vs. LR for PPU. However, the superiority of one method over the other remains a topic of debate. We conducted this review to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of LR over OR. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched from 2000 to 2022 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing OR and LR for PPU. Previous studies included seven postoperative outcomes, including mortality, reoperation, postoperative ileus, intra-abdominal abscess, leakage, pneumonia, and wound infection. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the eligible studies using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: Five systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, involving 36 studies. The pooled estimate showed that the risks for mortality, postoperative ileus, and wound infection were significantly lower with LR. In comparison, the risks for reoperation and leakage were less with OR. Based on the pooled estimate, no significant relationship was noted between the surgical method and intraabdominal abscess or postoperative pneumonia. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that in stable patients with PPU, LR is better than OR in terms of mortality. However, more high-quality evidence is needed to determine which is more appropriate for different circumstances (e.g., unstable or high-risk patients).

Erector spinae plane block for laparoscopic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel analgesic technique that can reduce post-operative pain and postoperative opioid consumption in laparoscopic surgeries.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on November 17th, 2023 for clinical trials comparing ESPB with other analgesic techniques or placebo for laparoscopic surgeries. We meta-analyzed post-operative pain at rest, postoperative opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request, and postoperative nausea and vomiting using a random effects model.

RESULTS

ESPB significantly reduced opioid consumption compared to placebo (SMD, (95CI), p-value; -1.837, (-2.331, -1.343), < 0.001) and also compared to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) (SMD, (95CI), p-value; -1.351, (-1.815, -0.887), < 0.001) but not quadratus lumborum plane block (QLB) (SMD, (95CI), p-value; 0.022, (-0.241, 0.286), 0.869). ESPB also significantly reduced participant-reported pain scores at rest at 24h post-operation compared to placebo (SMD, (95CI), p-value; -0.612, (-0.797, -0.428), < 0.001) and TAPB (SMD, (95CI), p-value; -0.465, (-0.767, -0.162), < 0.001), however, there was a significant increase in pain score compared to QLB (SMD, (95CI), p-value; 1.025, 0.156, 1.894), 0.021). A statistically significant increase in time to first rescue analgesic in ESPB groups compared to placebo and TAPB groups was observed in our meta-analysis. There was a lower post-operative nausea and vomiting rate in the ESPB groups compared to placebo groups, yet a comparable rate with QLB and TAPB groups was observed in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

ESPB is an effective and safe analgesic technique for managing post-operative pain and opioid consumption in laparoscopic surgeries compared to placebo, reducing postoperative nausea or vomiting as well. Compared to other techniques, ESPB has a similar efficacy to QLB, except for the pain score at 24 h post-operation, but appears to be superior to TAPB as an analgesic technique in laparoscopic surgeries, with a similar safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero registration ID: CRD42024508363. Link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.

Analysis of hospitalization costs in adult inguinal hernia: based on quantile regression model

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure with significant variability in hospitalization costs. Traditional cost analysis methods often overlook the distribution of costs across patient demographics and clinical factors. This study employs a quantile regression model to explore the determinants of hospitalization costs for adult inguinal hernia surgery, providing a detailed understanding of cost variations across different quantiles.

METHODS

We analyzed data from adult patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The study included patient demographics, hernia-related information, surgery-related details, and cost-related data. A quantile regression model was used to assess the impact of various factors on hospitalization costs at different quantiles (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%). Data were processed using StataSE 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Our study included 16,602 patients, predominantly male (91.86%) and Han Chinese (96.48%), with the 51-64 years age group being the largest (26.80%). The quantile regression analysis revealed significant cost variations across different quantiles. Younger patients incurred higher costs, with age coefficients ranging from -40.541 at the 90th quantile to -3.082 at the 10th quantile. Uninsured patients faced higher costs, with coefficients from 214.747 at the 80th quantile to 501.78 at the 10th quantile. Longer hospital stays correlated with increased costs, with coefficients from 342.15 at the 80th quantile to 405.613 at the 90th quantile. Patients hospitalized multiple times (≥3) had lower costs, with coefficients from -767.353 at the 40th quantile to -311.575 at the 80th quantile. Comorbidities significantly raised costs, with coefficients for three or more comorbidities ranging from 806.122 at the 80th quantile to 1,456.02 at the 40th quantile. Laparoscopic surgery was more expensive than open surgery, with coefficients from 1,834.206 at the 80th quantile to 2,805.281 at the 10th quantile. Bilateral surgeries and the use of biological mesh also resulted in higher costs, with coefficients for bilateral surgeries ranging from 1,067.708 at the 10th quantile to 2,871.126 at the 90th quantile and for biological mesh from 3,221.216 at the 40th quantile to 6,117.598 at the 90th quantile.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization costs for inguinal hernia surgery are influenced by multiple factors, with significant variations across different patient groups. Strategies to control costs should be tailored to address the specific needs of patients, optimize surgical methods, and improve perioperative care. Future research should extend these findings across different healthcare settings and consider the latest advancements in medical technology and policy changes.

Predicting Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Machine Learning Approach Using SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica) CoDIG Data

The evolution of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, particularly with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL), represents a significant advancement in colon cancer surgery. The CoDIG 1 and CoDIG 2 studies highlighted Italy's progressive approach, providing useful findings for optimizing patient outcomes and procedural efficiency. Within this context, accurately predicting postoperative length of stay (LoS) is crucial for improving resource allocation and patient care, yet its determination through machine learning techniques (MLTs) remains underexplored. This study aimed to harness MLTs to forecast the LoS for patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for colon cancer, using data from the CoDIG 1 (1224 patients) and CoDIG 2 (788 patients) studies. Multiple MLT algorithms, including random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to predict LoS, with CoDIG 1 data used for internal validation and CoDIG 2 data for external validation. The RF algorithm showed a strong internal validation performance, achieving the best performances and a 0.92 ROC in predicting long-term stays (more than 5 days). External validation using the SVM model demonstrated 75% ROC values. Factors such as fast-track protocols, anastomosis, and drainage emerged as key predictors of LoS. Integrating MLTs into predicting postoperative LOS in colon cancer surgery offers a promising avenue for personalized patient care and improved surgical management. Using intraoperative features in the algorithm enables the profiling of a patient's stay based on the planned intervention. This issue is important for tailoring postoperative care to individual patients and for hospitals to effectively plan and manage long-term stays for more critical procedures.

Comparison of inflammatory markers in low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular block versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP) is an attempt to improve laparoscopic surgery. Lower pressure causes lesser inflammation and better hemodynamics. There is a lack of literature comparing inflammatory markers in LPP with deep NMB to standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) with moderate NMB in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODOLOGY

This was a single institutional prospective randomized control trial. Participants included all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease. Participants were divided into 2 groups group A and B. Group A-Low-pressure group in which pneumoperitoneum pressure was kept low (8-10 mmHg) with deep Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) and Group B-Normal pressure group (12-14 mmHg) with moderate NMB. A convenience sample size of 80 with 40 in each group was selected. Lab investigations like CBC, LFT, RFT and serum IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, TNF alpha levels were measured at base line and 24 h after surgery and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Other parameters like length of hospital stay, post-operative pain score, conversion rate (low-pressure to standard pressure), and complications were also compared.

RESULTS

Eighty participants were analysed with 40 in each group. Baseline characteristics and investigations were statistically similar. Difference (post-operative-pre-operative) of inflammatory markers were compared between both groups. Numerically there was a slightly higher rise in most of the inflammatory markers (TLC, ESR, CRP, IL-6, TNFα) in Group B compared to Group A but not statistically significant. Albumin showed significant fall (p < 0.001) in Group B compared to Group A. Post-operative pain was also significantly less (p < 0.001) in Group A compared to Group B at 6 h and 24 h. There were no differences in length of hospital stay and incidence of complications. There was no conversion from low-pressure to standard pressure.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed under low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep NMB may have lesser inflammation and lesser post-operative pain compared to standard pressure pneumoperitoneum with moderate NMB. Future studies with larger sample size need to be designed to support these findings.

Innovations in Hybrid Laparoscopic Surgery: Integrating Advanced Technologies for Multidisciplinary Cases

Combining conventional laparoscopic techniques with cutting-edge technologies, such as robotics, improved imaging, and flexible equipment, hybrid laparoscopic techniques represent a revolutionary advancement in minimally invasive surgery. These methods have several benefits, such as increased accuracy, quicker healing periods, and fewer complications, which makes them especially useful in complicated multidisciplinary situations. The historical evolution, uses, benefits, and drawbacks of hybrid laparoscopic procedures are examined in this narrative review, which also covers urological, gastrointestinal, cardiothoracic, and gynecological surgery. The review focuses on how these methods promote interdisciplinary cooperation and creativity by enabling more accurate and successful surgical operations. It also discusses the equipment needs, integration difficulties, and technical difficulties that need to be resolved to reach the full potential of hybrid laparoscopic surgery. For hybrid laparoscopic procedures to become more widely used and effective in the future, there is a need for specialized training programs, interdisciplinary research collaborations, and ongoing technological advancements.

Partnering With Technology: Advancing Laparoscopy With Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative technologies in optimizing laparoscopic surgery, offering innovative solutions to enhance surgical precision, efficiency, and safety. This editorial explores the potential role of AI/ML across the surgical continuum, including preoperative optimization, intraoperative assistance, and postoperative care. It outlines the benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared to traditional open procedures and identifies current challenges such as technical difficulty and human error. The editorial discusses how AI and ML technologies can address these challenges, including patient selection and risk stratification, surgical planning and simulation, and personalized medicine approaches. Moreover, it examines the role of AI/ML in intraoperative assistance, such as instrument tracking and guidance, real-time tissue analysis, and the detection of potential complications. Postoperative care and follow-up are also explored, highlighting the potential of AI/ML in monitoring patient recovery, predicting and preventing complications, and tailoring rehabilitation plans. Ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and security, the lack of transparency in decision-making, potential job displacement, and regulatory frameworks are discussed as challenges to the widespread adoption of AI/ML in laparoscopic surgery. Finally, potential areas for further research and exploration are outlined, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration and the need for transparent and accountable AI systems. Overall, this editorial provides insights into the challenges and opportunities in harnessing AI/ML technologies to optimize laparoscopic surgery and improve patient outcomes.

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a non-inferiority randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP) is an attempt at improving laparoscopic surgery. However, it has the issue of poor working space for which deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) may be a solution. There is a lack of literature comparing LPP with deep NMB to standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) with moderate NMB.

METHODOLOGY

This was a single institutional prospective non-inferiority RCT, with permuted block randomization of subjects into group A and B [Group A: LPP; 8-10 mmHg with deep NMB [ Train of Four count (TOF): 0, Post Tetanic Count (PTC): 1-2] and Group B: SPP; 12-14 mmHg with moderate NMB]. The level of NMB was monitored with neuromuscular monitor with TOF count and PTC. Cisatracurium infusion was used for continuous deep NMB in group A. Primary outcome measures were the surgeon satisfaction score and the time for completion of the procedure. Secondarily important clinical outcomes were also reported.

RESULTS

Of the 222 patients screened, 181 participants were enrolled [F: 138 (76.2%); M: 43 (23.8%); Group A n = 90, Group B n = 91]. Statistically similar surgeon satisfaction scores (26.1 ± 3.7 vs 26.4 ± 3.4; p = 0.52) and time for completion (55.2 ± 23.4 vs 52.5 ± 24.9 min; p = 0.46) were noted respectively in groups A and B. On both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis it was found that group A was non-inferior to group B in terms of total surgeon satisfaction score, however, non-inferiority was not proven for time for completion of surgery. Mean pain scores and incidence of shoulder pain were statistically similar up-to 7 days of follow-up in both groups. 4 (4.4%) patients in group B and 2 (2.2%) in group A had bradycardia (p = 0.4). Four (4.4%) cases of group A were converted to group B. One case of group B converted to open surgery. Bile spills and gallbladder perforations were comparable.

CONCLUSION

LPP with deep NMB is non-inferior to SPP with moderate NMB in terms of surgeon satisfaction score but not in terms of time required to complete the procedure. Clinical outcomes and safety profile are similar in both groups. However, it could be marginally costlier to use LPP with deep NMB.

Surgical Frontiers: A Comparative Review of Robotics Versus Laparoscopy in Gynecological Interventions

This review comprehensively examines the current state and future directions of gynecological surgery, focusing on the comparative analysis of laparoscopy and robotic surgery. The overview highlights the evolution of these surgical techniques, emphasizing their impact on patient outcomes, procedural efficiency, and safety profiles. The analysis encompasses critical factors such as cost-effectiveness, learning curves, and implications for postoperative recovery. The future of gynecological surgery is envisioned through emerging technologies, including augmented reality, single-incision laparoscopy, and artificial intelligence. The coexistence of laparoscopy and robotics is explored, acknowledging their respective strengths and roles in shaping women's healthcare. In conclusion, the dynamic nature of the field is underscored, emphasizing the need for a patient-centered and adaptable approach. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, engineers, and researchers is pivotal in unlocking these innovations' full potential, ensuring continued advancements in gynecological surgery for improved outcomes and enhanced patient care.

Learning curves and procedural times in Senhance®-robotic assisted fundoplication: results from 237 consecutive patients undergoing robotic fundoplication in a single center as part of the European TRUST Robotic Surgery Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring an operative solution is common. Minimally invasive surgery to generate an anti-reflux barrier at the distal esophagus following the principle of the "floppy Nissen" technique has become the gold standard. Advanced robotic-assisted systems may deliver more consisted outcomes.

METHODS

This registry study analyzed safety and efficacy of the Senhance® surgical system in the surgical treatment of reflux disease and procedural proficiency. Data from 237 consecutive patients operated in a single center were evaluated. Historic standard laparoscopies from the same center were analyzed to compare robotic surgery learning curve effects.

RESULTS

Using the Senhance® Surgical System, during the first 50 patients there was a significant decrease in surgery time which was maintained over the duration of study, pointing to the surgical staff's system-specific learning. After this phase, procedural times were comparable between the robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery. The effect of learning was greater than for standard laparoscopy. For 237 patients, there were four conversions to laparoscopic surgery. Two serious adverse events were recorded, both cardiac in nature and not related to the use of the robot.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic fundoplication was swiftly implemented in a non-university hospital with 65 surgical beds. The operating time was no longer than in standard laparoscopy, the procedure was more standardized than open or laparoscopic surgery and hospitalization times may have been sustainably shortened. The autonomy at the system's digital platform (cockpit) to conduct robotic fundoplications is a big step forward in surgery.

Effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing on inflammation and liver function after laparoscopic radical resection of primary liver cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing on inflammation and liver function in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) after laparoscopic radical resection.

METHODS

A total of 124 PLC patients who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery in the Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province from April 2019 to July 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Among them, 65 patients who received rapid rehabilitation nursing were assigned into the observation group (OG), and the other 59 with routine nursing were considered to be the control group (CG). The pain before operation (T0), 3 days after operation (T1) and 7 days after operation (T2) was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The perioperative related indexes and nursing satisfaction were compared. The levels of liver function indexes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and inflammatory factors C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured before operation, 1 day and 7 days after operation. Finally, the incidence of postoperative complications was counted, the 6-month survival rate of both groups of patients was compared.

RESULTS

There was no obvious difference in VAS scores between the two groups at T0 (P>0.050), but the VAS scores at T1 and T2 in the OG were lower than those in the CG (P<0.001). There was no marked difference in the total operation time. Compared with the CG, the time to first exhaust, catheter indwelling and hospitalization in the OG were shorter (P<0.001) and the nursing satisfaction rate was higher (P<0.05). There was no obvious difference in ALT, AST and TBIL on the 1st day after operation (P>0.05); however, on the 7th day after operation, ALT and AST were lower while TBIL was higher in the OG (all P<0.05). There was no marked difference in CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α between the two groups on postoperative day 1 (P>0.05), but the levels were lower in the OG than those in the CG on postoperative day 7 (all P<0.05), and the total incidence of adverse reactions in the OG was lower (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative survival rate between both groups of patients (P>0.05). Age, number of lesions, tumor size, Child-Pugh grade, AST, TBIL, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α were associated with the survival rate of patients.

CONCLUSION

Rapid rehabilitation nursing can effectively reduce adverse reactions after laparoscopic radical resection of PLC. Thus, it has a high application value in future clinical treatment.