Percutaneous Management of Biliary Enteric Anastomotic Strictures: An Institutional Review

A novel technique of percutaneous transhepatic treatment of biliary-enteric anastomotic occlusive strictures with compliant balloon-occluded distal cholangiography and large-bore catheter: a retrospective case series

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary balloon dilatation (PTBD) is a challenge in resolving biliary-enteric anastomotic occlusive strictures (BEAOS) and/or coexisting stones. The biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA) often cannot be seen because of the surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Here, a technique that combined percutaneous compliant-occluded distal cholangiography and the maintenance of a large-bore catheter is described to resolve this issue.

Methods

A retrospective review of 10 patients who presented with BEAOS with/without coexisting stones who were treated with percutaneous compliant balloon-occluded distal cholangiography, bile duct stone removal, and the maintenance of a large-bore catheter between February 2017 and January 2021 was performed. Treatment response, laboratory examinations, including hepatic function tests, routine blood tests, and blood electrolytes, complications, and imaging data were evaluated. Paired t-tests were used to investigate the difference of laboratory examinations before and after the procedure.

Results

All 10 cases were technically successful. A total of 9 stones in 6 patients were successfully removed by the compliant balloon. All catheters were removed after the patency of the stricture was confirmed by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTHC) 6 months later. No severe adverse events occurred during the perioperative period. There were 2 patients who experienced episodes of cholangitis during the follow-up period (mean, 17 months; range, 4-24 months), and neither BEAOS nor bile duct stones recurred within 2 years after the procedure. White blood cells (WBC), total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were (6.0±1.4)×109/L and (6.0±1.6)×109/L (P=0.91), 31.4±15.7 and 29.6±10.3 µmol/L (P=0.74), 50.8±20.0 and 85.8±67.0 U/L (P=0.16), and 42.6±15.2 and 71.8±44.9 U/L (P=0.09) pre and postintervention, respectively.

Conclusions

Percutaneous transhepatic compliant balloon-occluded distal cholangiography and the maintenance of a large-bore catheter probably provide an effective and safe alternative method for resolving BEAOS and/or coexisting stones.

Innovative Water-Wire Cannulation Technique for Managing Near-Complete Obstruction Due to Post-orthotopic Liver Transplant Anastomotic Strictures: A Report of Two Cases

This report presents an innovative water-wire cannulation technique for managing challenging anastomotic strictures in post-orthotopic liver transplant patients, highlighting its successful application in two distinct cases. Anastomotic strictures pose a significant hurdle in hepatobiliary medicine, often complicating the course post-liver transplantation. Standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) methods frequently encounter limitations in severe stricture cases, necessitating alternative approaches. The water-wire cannulation technique, introduced in this report, innovatively utilizes water injection to gently dilate the stricture, enabling successful guidewire insertion and subsequent standard endoscopic interventions. This method was effectively applied in two patients with severe anastomotic strictures, where conventional ERCP techniques were unsuccessful. The technique's effectiveness, demonstrated in these cases, offers a less invasive and potentially safer alternative to traditional options like cholangioscopy, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), or surgical revision, which carry higher risks and complexities. The water-wire cannulation technique's success emphasizes the need for innovative and adaptable strategies in hepatobiliary medicine, especially for managing post-transplant complications. Its potential applicability in a broader spectrum of biliary strictures warrants further exploration. Overall, this technique represents a significant advancement in the endoscopic management of complex biliary strictures, promising to enhance patient care and outcomes in hepatobiliary medicine.

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree, followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a novel technique that allows BD by echoendoscopy and fluoroscopy using a stent from the biliary tree to the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

To compare the technical aspects and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic BD (PTBD) and EUS-BD.

METHODS

Different databases, including PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses to obtain studies comparing PTBD and EUS-BD.

RESULTS

Among the six studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PTBD patients underwent significantly more reinterventions (4.9 vs 1.3), experienced more postprocedural pain (4.1 vs 1.9), and experienced more late adverse events (53.8% vs 6.6%) than EUS-BD patients. There was a significant reduction in the total bilirubin levels in both the groups (16.4-3.3 μmol/L and 17.2-3.8 μmol/L for EUS-BD and PTBD, respectively; P = 0.002) at the 7-d follow-up. There were no significant differences observed in the complication rates between PTBD and EUS-BD (3.3 vs 3.8). PTBD was associated with a higher adverse event rate than EUS-BD in all the procedures, including reinterventions (80.4% vs 15.7%, respectively) and a higher index procedure (39.2% vs 18.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review revealed that EUS-BD is linked with a higher rate of effective BD and a more manageable procedure-related adverse event profile than PTBD. These findings highlight the evidence for successful EUS-BD implementation.

Perineural Invasion Is a Significant Indicator of High Malignant Degree and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a malignant metastatic mode of tumors and has been reported in many tumors including esophageal cancer (EC). However, the role of PNI in EC has been reported differently. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to focus on the role of PNI in EC.

Methods

Eight databases of CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Scopus, Wiley, ISI, PubMed, and EBSCO are used for literature search. The association of PNI with gender, pathological stages of T and N (pT and pN), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node metastasis, 5-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was examined in the meta-analysis by Revman5.0 Software. The pooled OR/HR and 95% CI were used to assess the risk and prognostic value.

Results

Sixty-nine published studies were screened for analysis of PNI in EC. The incidence of PNI in esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) was different, but not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The PNI-positive patients had a significantly higher risk of pT stage (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.45–6.05, p < 0.00001), pN stage (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.52–2.28, p < 0.00001), LVI (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.55–3.85, p = 0.0001), and lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56–5.29, p = 0.0007). Furthermore, the cumulative analysis revealed a significant correlation between PNI and poor OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.24–1.51, p < 0.0001), as well as poor DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.38–1.74, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

PNI occurrence is significantly related to tumor stage, LVI, lymph node metastasis, OS, and DFS. These results indicate that PNI can serve as an indicator of high malignant degree and poor prognosis in EC.

Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Evidence-Based Guidelines for Percutaneous Image-Guided Biliary Procedures

Percutaneous biliary interventions are among the commonly performed nonvascular radiological interventions. Most common of these interventions is the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction. Other biliary procedures performed include percutaneous cholecystostomy, biliary stenting, drainage for bile leaks, and various procedures like balloon dilatation, stenting, and large-bore catheter drainage for bilioenteric or post-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although these procedures are being performed for ages, no standard guidelines have been formulated. This article attempts at preparing guidelines for performing various percutaneous image-guided biliary procedures along with discussion on the published evidence in this field.

[Russian consensus on current issues in the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive jaundice syndrome]

The Russian consensus document on topical issues of the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive jaundice syndrome was prepared by a group of experts in various fields of surgery, endoscopy, interventional radiology, radiological diagnosis and intensive care. The goal of this document is to clarify and consolidate the opinions of national experts on the following issues: timing of diagnosis of obstructive jaundice, features of diagnostic measures, the need and possibility of conservative measures for obstructive jaundice, and strategy of biliary decompression depending on the cause and level of biliary block.