Elevated Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in a Non-pregnant Female With Altered Kidney Function

Non-gestational choriocarcinoma: unraveling the similarities and distinctions from its gestational counterpart

Choriocarcinoma is a highly vascular and invasive tumor of anaplastic trophoblast, predominantly made up of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts without villi. Based on its origin, choriocarcinoma can be either gestational or non-gestational. Non-gestational choriocarcinoma can be of germ cell origin, or can be seen in association with a somatic high-grade malignancy. It is difficult to differentiate gestational from non-gestational choriocarcinoma, especially in the reproductive age group. It is important to distinguish between the two, for accurate staging and prognostication, deciding the primary treatment modality, (ie, surgery or chemotherapy), and tailoring follow-up timeframes after diagnosis. An extensive literature search was performed regarding all cases of non-gestational choriocarcinoma, published before March 2023. A note was made of whether the origin of choriocarcinoma was ascertained and how gestational choriocarcinoma was differentiated from non-gestational choriocarcinoma. The keywords used for literature search were "non-gestational choriocarcinoma", "primary choriocarcinoma", "ovarian choriocarcinoma", "ovarian germ cell tumors", or "choriocarcinomatous differentiation". This review aims to summarize the similarities and differences in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management guidelines between gestational and non-gestational choriocarcinoma, which can form an important educational resource for clinicians and laboratory physicians dealing with such cases.

Factors influencing blood tumor marker concentrations in the absence of neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Tumor markers (TMs) are a heterogeneous group of molecules used in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of cancer patients. During neoplastic differentiation, cells can either directly synthesize or induce the synthesis of TMs, and the release of these molecules into the bloodstream allows their quantification in biological fluids. Although very small concentrations of TMs are usually present in the serum or plasma of healthy subjects, increased concentrations may also be found in the presence of benign diseases or due to technical interference, producing false positive results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS AND RESULTS

Our review analyses the causes of false positives described between January 1970 to February 2023 for the TMs most frequently used in clinical practice: α-fetoprotein (AFP), β2-microglobulin (β2-M), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), cancer antigen CA 19-9 (CA 19-9), cancer antigen CA 72-4 (CA 72-4), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), chromogranin A (CgA), choriogonadotropin (hCG), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), serum HER2 (sHER2), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II), Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Protein S-100 (S-100) and thyroglobulin (Tg). A total of 247 references were included.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of pathophysiological processes and other conditions that affect the concentration of TMs might improve the interpretation of results and their clinical application.