1
|
Ferini G, Viola A, Valenti V, Tripoli A, Molino L, Marchese VA, Illari SI, Rita Borzì G, Prestifilippo A, Umana GE, Martorana E, Mortellaro G, Ferrera G, Cacciola A, Lillo S, Pontoriero A, Pergolizzi S, Parisi S. Whole Brain Irradiation or Stereotactic RadioSurgery for five or more brain metastases (WHOBI-STER): A prospective comparative study of neurocognitive outcomes, level of autonomy in daily activities and quality of life. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 32:52-58. [PMID: 34926839 PMCID: PMC8649107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The main aim of MBM treatment is to palliate neurological symptoms and to maintain an adequate QoL. SRT could be the “new standard” over WBI in the management of MBM patients. Neurocognitive functions could deteriorate more after WBI than after SRT.
Aims To evaluate neurocognitive performance, daily activity and quality of life (QoL), other than usual oncologic outcomes, among patients with brain metastasis ≥5 (MBM) from solid tumors treated with Stereotactic Brain Irradiation (SBI) or Whole Brain Irradiation (WBI). Methods This multicentric randomized controlled trial will involve the enrollment of 100 patients (50 for each arm) with MBM ≥ 5, age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 70, life expectancy > 3 months, known primary tumor, with controlled or controllable extracranial disease, baseline Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score ≥ 20/30, Barthel Activities of Daily Living score ≥ 90/100, to be submitted to SBI by LINAC with monoisocentric technique and non-coplanar arcs (experimental arm) or to WBI (control arm). The primary endpoints are neurocognitive performance, QoL and autonomy in daily-life activities variations, the first one assessed by MoCa Score and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, the second one through the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-BN-20 questionnaires, the third one through the Barthel Index, respectively. The secondary endpoints are time to intracranial failure, overall survival, retreatment rate, acute and late toxicities, changing of KPS. It will be considered significant a statistical difference of at least 30% between the two arms (statistical power of 80% with a significance level of 95%). Discussion Several studies debate what is the decisive factor accountable for the development of neurocognitive decay among patients undergoing brain irradiation for MBM: radiation effect on clinically healthy brain tissue or intracranial tumor burden? The answer to this question may come from the recent technological advancement that allows, in a context of a significant time saving, improved patient comfort and minimizing radiation dose to off-target brain, a selective treatment of MBM simultaneously, otherwise attackable only by WBI. The achievement of a local control rate comparable to that obtained with WBI remains the fundamental prerequisite. Trial registration NCT number: NCT04891471.
Collapse
Key Words
- 3D-CRT, 3Dimensional-ConformalRadioTherapy
- Autonomy in daily activities
- BSC, Best Supportive Care
- Brain metastases
- CRF, Case Report Form
- CT, Computerized Tomography
- CTV, Clinical Target Volume
- EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care
- FSRT, Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status
- LINAC, Linear Accelerator
- MBM, Multiple Brain Metastastes
- MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Neurocognitive decay
- Neurocognitive performance
- Neurocognitive tests
- OAR, Organ At Risk
- OS, Overall Survival
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- Palliative care
- QLQ-BN20, Quality of Life Questionnaire - Brain Neoplasm 20
- QoL, Quality of Life
- Quality of life
- RT, Radiation Therapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases
- SBI, Stereotactic Brain Irradiation
- SRS, Stereotactic RadioSurgery
- SRT, Stereotactic Radiation Therapy
- Stereotactic Brain RadioSurgery
- Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy
- Supportive care in cancer patients
- VEGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Viola
- Fondazione IOM, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | - Vito Valenti
- REM Radioterapia srl, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Laura Molino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Angela Prestifilippo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Mediterranean Institute of Oncology, Viagrande, I-95029 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana
- Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Cannizzaro Hospital, I-95125 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Mortellaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, I-90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Cacciola
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, I-98100 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Q, Kubicek G, Mulvihill D, Eastwick G, Goldman H, Turtz AR, Fan J, Luo D. Tuning-Target-Guided Inverse Planning of Brain Tumors With Abutting Organs at Risk During Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Cureus 2020; 12:e9585. [PMID: 32923191 PMCID: PMC7480783 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We proposed a planning strategy that utilized tuning targets to guide GammaKnife (GK) Inverse Planning (IP) to deliver higher dose to the tumor, while keeping acceptable dose to the abutting organ at risk (OAR). Methods Ten patients with a large portion of brain tumor abutting the OAR previously treated with GK stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were selected. For each patient, multiple tuning targets were created by cropping the target contour from three-dimensional (3D) expansions of the OAR. The number of the tuning targets depended on the complexity of the planning process. To demonstrate dose sparing effect, an IP plan was generated for each tuning target after one round of optimization without shot fine-tuning. In the dose enhancement study, a more aggressive target dose was prescribed to the tuning target with a larger margin and one to two shots were filled in the region with missing dose. The resulting plans were compared to the previously approved clinical plans. Results For all 10 patients, a dose sparing effect was observed, i.e. both target coverage and dose to the OARs decreased when the margins of 3D expansion increased. For one patient, a margin of 6 mm was needed to decrease the maximum dose to the optical chiasm and optical nerve by 44.3% and 28.4%, respectively. For the other nine patients, the mean dropping rate of V12Gyto brain stem were 28.2% and 59.5% for tuning targets of 1 and 2 mm margins, respectively. In the dose enhancement study, the tuning-target-guided plans were hotter than the approved treatment plans, while keeping similar dose to the OARs. The mean of the treatment and enhancement dose was 15.6 ± 2.2 Gy and 18.5 ± 3.2 Gy, respectively. The mean coverage of the target by prescription dose was slightly higher in the enhancement plans (96.9 ± 2.6% vs 96.3 ± 3.6%), whereas the mean coverage of the enhancement dose was 20.1% higher in the enhancement plans (89.6 ± 9.0% vs 74.6 ± 19.9%). Conclusions We demonstrated that an inverse planning strategy could facilitate target dose enhancement for challenging GK cases while keeping acceptable OAR dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyi Xu
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Mount Laurel, USA
| | | | | | - Gary Eastwick
- Radiation Oncology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA
| | | | - Alan R Turtz
- Neurosurgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA
| | - Jiajin Fan
- Radiation Oncology, Inova Health System, Fairfax, USA
| | - Dershan Luo
- Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|