Meningitis With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in an Older Patient With Nonspecific Symptoms: A Case Report

Factors Affecting Recurrent Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Among Older Patients in Rural Community Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) poses a significant health risk, particularly among adults over 65 years old, due to age-related vulnerabilities and comorbidities. Recurrent SAB is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs, necessitating the identification of risk factors that contribute to these recurrent infections. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a rural community hospital to identify factors associated with recurrent SAB in older patients. Data were extracted from electronic medical records of patients diagnosed with SAB between April 2016 and December 2023. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to analyze the relationship between recurrent SAB and potential risk factors, including age, sex, BMI, dependency on Japanese long-term health insurance, and comorbidities. Results Among 99 patients with SAB, 36 (36.4%) experienced recurrence. Higher BMI was significantly associated with recurrent SAB (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.31, p = 0.036), while dependency on long-term care was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06-0.64, p = 0.007). Age and sex did not show significant associations with recurrence. Conclusion This study identified higher BMI as a risk factor for recurrent SAB in older patients, while dependency on long-term care was protective. These findings highlight the need for targeted management strategies for patients with higher BMI to prevent recurrent SAB. Further research is needed to explore these associations and confirm their relevance in other clinical settings.

Migratory Deposition of Calcium Pyrophosphate in an Older Patient With Several Femoral Neck Implant Infection Episodes: A Case Report

This case report describes an 86-year-old female patient who presented with complex post-surgical complications following orthopedic surgery for a femoral neck fracture. Initially diagnosed with septic shock due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia at the surgical site, the patient's treatment course was complicated, involving multiple hospital transfers and varying treatments, including antibiotics and surgical drainage. Despite the absence of infection indicators post treatment, the patient later developed severe thigh pain and was found to have migratory pseudogout, an unusual diagnosis in the context of MRSA and post-surgical complications. This report emphasizes the diagnostic challenges in distinguishing between surgical site infections and other inflammatory conditions like migratory pseudogout, particularly in older patients with comorbidities. It underscores the importance of comprehensive evaluations and the need for general physicians to maintain a broad differential diagnosis when managing post-surgical infections. The case highlights the persistence and recurrence risk of MRSA infections, even post-appropriate antibiotic therapy, and the necessity of considering migratory pseudogout in patients with recurrent infections and systemic soft tissue involvement. The insights from this case contribute to the understanding of complex post-surgical complications and advocate for meticulous assessment and tailored treatment strategies in similar clinical scenarios.

Factors Associated With Blood Culture Contamination in Rural Hospitals in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Blood culture, a cornerstone diagnostic test, is paramount for identifying bacteremia due to serious infections. However, its accuracy is jeopardized by contamination, often due to inappropriate collection procedures. Resource constraints and a limitation in specialized staff can heighten contamination risks in rural hospitals, underscoring the need to understand the associated demographics and conditions. This study aimed to elucidate the demographics and conditions associated with heightened blood culture contamination risk in rural hospitals to optimize testing practices and improve patient care. Methods A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted in Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, Japan with participants suspected of having bacteremia. Data from the electronic medical records of 455 patients were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression with contamination as the dependent variable. Results Of the 455 patients who underwent blood culture testing, 321 and 134 tests were negative and positive for contamination, respectively. Older age and blood obtained from arteries were associated with a reduced risk of contamination (odds ratio (OR)=0.97; p=0.012, and OR=0.17; p=0.00069, respectively). Patients with dependencies exhibited an increase in contamination risk (OR=1.81; p=0.044). Patients admitted for infection demonstrated a reduced likelihood of sample contamination (OR=0.44; p=0.0034). The predominant organisms identified varied, with Escherichia coli being more frequent in uncontaminated blood samples and Staphylococcus epidermidis in the contaminated samples. Conclusion This study reveals a complex relationship between patient demographics, clinical practices, and the risk of contamination. Factors such as age, dependency status, and reason for admission were associated with sample contamination. Enhanced procedural stringency, microbial surveillance, and continuous training could mitigate these risks, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Identifying and understanding the factors influencing blood culture contamination can significantly bolster clinical practice in rural settings. While this study provides foundational insights, future research can deepen our understanding, ensuring the refinement of patient care protocols in similar environments.

Differentiating Between Undifferentiated Peripheral Spondyloarthritis From Septic Arthritis: A Case Report

Undifferentiated peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) and septic arthritis are two distinct differential diagnoses for patients with acute-onset monoarthritis. Effective history-taking and thorough physical examination are essential to differentiate between these two diseases. Precise follow-up can be critical for diagnosing undifferentiated peripheral SpA. Herein, we report our experience with two cases that required differentiation between undifferentiated peripheral SpA and septic arthritis. This case series shows the importance of ruling out septic arthritis promptly and considering the possibility of undifferentiated peripheral PsA based on clinical findings and imaging tests.