SohrabiAsl M, Shirani M, Jahanbakhshi A, Iranmehr A. Efficacy and Challenges: Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2024;
102:156-168. [PMID:
38648730 DOI:
10.1159/000538516]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) poses a therapeutic challenge, particularly within the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of four less-invasive treatment modalities for TGN in MS patients, namely, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), glycerol rhizotomy (GR), balloon compression (BC), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
METHODS
Single-armed meta-analyses were employed to assess the overall efficacy of each treatment, while double-armed analyses compared the efficacy between different treatment options in double-armed studies. Outcome evaluations included acute pain relief (within 1 month post-procedure), recurrence rates throughout 18 months of follow-up, and reported complication rates.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis revealed diverse outcomes for each intervention. GKRS demonstrated favorable outcomes, achieving a 77% success rate in alleviating pain among a pooled cohort of 863 patients, reinforcing its status as a viable therapeutic option. Additionally, GR, BC, and RFA exhibited efficacy, with success rates of 77%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, based on outcomes observed in 611, 385, and 203 patients. Double-armed analyses highlighted distinctions between the treatments, providing nuanced insights for clinical decision-making.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of less-invasive treatments for TGN in MS patients. GKRS emerges as a leading option with comparable efficacy and fewer complications. However, the study underscores the nuanced efficacy and considerations associated with GR, BC, and RFA. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians navigating treatment choices in this challenging patient population, considering acute pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication profiles.
Collapse