1
|
MRI-based delta-radiomic features for prediction of local control in liver lesions treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18631. [PMID: 36329116 PMCID: PMC9633752 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22826-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Real-time magnetic resonance image guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) is used to treat abdominal tumors. Longitudinal data is generated from daily setup images. Our study aimed to identify delta radiomic texture features extracted from these images to predict for local control in patients with liver tumors treated with MRgSBRT. Retrospective analysis of an IRB-approved database identified patients treated with MRgSBRT for primary liver and secondary metastasis histologies. Daily low field strength (0.35 T) images were retrieved, and the gross tumor volume was identified on each image. Next, images' gray levels were equalized, and 39 s-order texture features were extracted. Delta-radiomics were calculated as the difference between feature values on the initial scan and after delivered biological effective doses (BED, α/β = 10) of 20 Gy and 40 Gy. Then, features were ranked by the Gini Index during training of a random forest model. Finally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was estimated using a bootstrapped logistic regression with the top two features. We identified 22 patients for analysis. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The top two features identified after delivery of BED 20 Gy were gray level co-occurrence matrix features energy and gray level size zone matrix based large zone emphasis. The model generated an AUC = 0.9011 (0.752-1.0) during bootstrapped logistic regression. The same two features were selected after delivery of a BED 40 Gy, with an AUC = 0.716 (0.600-0.786). Delta-radiomic features after a single fraction of SBRT predicted local control in this exploratory cohort. If confirmed in larger studies, these features may identify patients with radioresistant disease and provide an opportunity for physicians to alter management much sooner than standard restaging after 3 months. Expansion of the patient database is warranted for further analysis of delta-radiomic features.
Collapse
|
2
|
Francolini G, Morelli I, Carnevale MG, Grassi R, Nardone V, Loi M, Valzano M, Salvestrini V, Livi L, Desideri I. Integration between Novel Imaging Technologies and Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: How the Eye Drove the Chisel. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5277. [PMID: 36358695 PMCID: PMC9656145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted dose-escalation and reduction of dose to adjacent organs at risk have been the main goal of radiotherapy in the last decade. Prostate cancer benefited the most from this process. In recent years, the development of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) radically changed clinical practice, also thanks to the availability of modern imaging techniques. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between diagnostic imaging and prostate cancer radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Aiming to provide an overview of the integration between modern imaging and radiotherapy techniques, we performed a non-systematic search of papers exploring the predictive value of imaging before treatment, the role of radiomics in predicting treatment outcomes, implementation of novel imaging in RT planning and influence of imaging integration on use of RT in current clinical practice. Three independent authors (GF, IM and ID) performed an independent review focusing on these issues. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used, and grey literature was searched for further papers of interest. The final choice of papers included was discussed between all co-authors. RESULTS This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the role of new modern techniques in predicting outcomes before treatment, in radiotherapy planning and in the integration with systemic therapy in the management of prostate cancer. Also, the role of radiomics in a tailored treatment approach is explored. CONCLUSIONS Integration between diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy is of great importance for the modern treatment of prostate cancer. Future clinical trials should be aimed at exploring the real clinical benefit of complex workflows in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Marianna Valzano
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferro M, de Cobelli O, Musi G, del Giudice F, Carrieri G, Busetto GM, Falagario UG, Sciarra A, Maggi M, Crocetto F, Barone B, Caputo VF, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Vartolomei MD, Cormio L, Autorino R, Tătaru OS. Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221109020. [PMID: 35814914 PMCID: PMC9260602 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221109020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy, via Ripamonti 435 Milano, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco del Giudice
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Francesco Caputo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Urology Unit, ‘SS. Annunziata’ Hospital, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASL Abruzzo 2, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mures, Târgu Mures, Romania
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
- Urology Unit, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Octavian Sabin Tătaru
- Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies, I.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Târgu Mures, Târgu Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nardone V, Reginelli A, Grassi R, Boldrini L, Vacca G, D'Ippolito E, Annunziata S, Farchione A, Belfiore MP, Desideri I, Cappabianca S. Delta radiomics: a systematic review. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1571-1583. [PMID: 34865190 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiomics can provide quantitative features from medical imaging that can be correlated with various biological features and clinical endpoints. Delta radiomics, on the other hand, consists in the analysis of feature variation at different acquisition time points, usually before and after therapy. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the different delta radiomics approaches. METHODS Eligible articles were searched in Embase, PubMed, and ScienceDirect using a search string that included free text and/or Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) with three key search terms: "radiomics", "texture", and "delta". Studies were analysed using QUADAS-2 and the RQS tool. RESULTS Forty-eight studies were finally included. The studies were divided into preclinical/methodological (five studies, 10.4%); rectal cancer (six studies, 12.5%); lung cancer (twelve studies, 25%); sarcoma (five studies, 10.4%); prostate cancer (three studies, 6.3%), head and neck cancer (six studies, 12.5%); gastrointestinal malignancies excluding rectum (seven studies, 14.6%), and other disease sites (four studies, 8.3%). The median RQS of all studies was 25% (mean 21% ± 12%), with 13 studies (30.2%) achieving a quality score < 10% and 22 studies (51.2%) < 25%. CONCLUSIONS Delta radiomics shows potential benefit for several clinical endpoints in oncology (differential diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response, and evaluation of side effects). Nevertheless, the studies included in this systematic review suffer from the bias of overall low quality, so that the conclusions are currently heterogeneous, not robust, and not replicable. Further research with prospective and multicentre studies is needed for the clinical validation of delta radiomics approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Vacca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Emma D'Ippolito
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Farchione
- Dipartimento Di Diagnostica Per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica Ed Ematologia - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghezzo S, Bezzi C, Presotto L, Mapelli P, Bettinardi V, Savi A, Neri I, Preza E, Samanes Gajate AM, De Cobelli F, Scifo P, Picchio M. State of the art of radiomic analysis in the clinical management of prostate cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103544. [PMID: 34801699 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We present the current clinical applications of radiomics in the context of prostate cancer (PCa) management. Several online databases for original articles using a combination of the following keywords: "(radiomic or radiomics) AND (prostate cancer or prostate tumour or prostate tumor or prostate neoplasia)" have been searched. The selected papers have been pooled as focus on (i) PCa detection, (ii) assessing the clinical significance of PCa, (iii) biochemical recurrence prediction, (iv) radiation-therapy outcome prediction and treatment efficacy monitoring, (v) metastases detection, (vi) metastases prediction, (vii) prediction of extra-prostatic extension. Seventy-six studies were included for qualitative analyses. Classifiers powered with radiomic features were able to discriminate between healthy tissue and PCa and between low- and high-risk PCa. However, before radiomics can be proposed for clinical use its methods have to be standardized, and these first encouraging results need to be robustly replicated in large and independent cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luca Presotto
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentino Bettinardi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Annarita Savi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Neri
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Erik Preza
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Radiology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Desideri I, Loi M, Francolini G, Becherini C, Livi L, Bonomo P. Application of Radiomics for the Prediction of Radiation-Induced Toxicity in the IMRT Era: Current State-of-the-Art. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1708. [PMID: 33117669 PMCID: PMC7574641 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models that were formulated in the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) are one of the pillars in support of everyday’s clinical radiation oncology. Because of steady therapeutic refinements and the availability of cutting-edge technical solutions, the ceiling of organs-at-risk-sparing has been reached for photon-based intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The possibility to capture heterogeneity of patients and tissues in the prediction of toxicity is still an unmet need in modern radiation therapy. Potentially, a major step towards a wider therapeutic index could be obtained from refined assessment of radiation-induced morbidity at an individual level. The rising integration of quantitative imaging and machine learning applications into radiation oncology workflow offers an unprecedented opportunity to further explore the biologic interplay underlying the normal tissue response to radiation. Based on these premises, in this review we focused on the current-state-of-the-art on the use of radiomics for the prediction of toxicity in the field of head and neck, lung, breast and prostate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hu L, Zhou DW, Fu CX, Benkert T, Jiang CY, Li RT, Wei LM, Zhao JG. Advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging vs. full-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection: a radiomic features study. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:1760-1769. [PMID: 32935192 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07227-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the efficiency of prostate cancer (PCa) detection using a radiomics signature based on advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional full-field-of-view DWI. METHODS A total of 136 patients, including 73 patients with PCa and 63 without PCa, underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI). Radiomic features were extracted from prostate lesion areas segmented on full-field-of-view DWI with b-value = 1500 s/mm2 (f-DWIb1500), advanced zoomed DWI images with b-value = 1500 s/mm2 (z-DWIb1500), calculated zoomed DWI with b-value = 2000 s/mm2 (z-calDWIb2000), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from both sequences (f-ADC and z-ADC). Single-imaging modality radiomics signature, mp-MRI radiomics signature, and a mixed model based on mp-MRI and clinically independent risk factors were built to predict PCa probability. The diagnostic efficacy and the potential net benefits of each model were evaluated. RESULTS Both z-DWIb1500 and z-calDWIb2000 had significantly better predictive performance than f-DWIb1500 (z-DWIb1500 vs. f-DWIb1500: p = 0.048; z-calDWIb2000 vs. f-DWIb1500: p = 0.014). z-ADC had a slightly higher area under the curve (AUC) value compared with f-ADC value but was not significantly different (p = 0.127). For predicting the presence of PCa, the AUCs of clinical independent risk factors model, mp-MRI model, and mixed model were 0.81, 0.93, and 0.94 in training sets, and 0.74, 0.92, and 0.93 in validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSION Radiomics signatures based on the z-DWI technology had better diagnostic accuracy for PCa than that based on the f-DWI technology. The mixed model was better at diagnosing PCa and guiding clinical interventions for patients with suspected PCa compared with mp-MRI signatures and clinically independent risk factors. KEY POINTS • Advanced zoomed DWI technology can improve the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics signatures for PCa. • Radiomics signatures based on z-calDWIb2000 have the best diagnostic performance among individual imaging modalities. • Compared with the independent clinical risk factors and the mp-MRI model, the mixed model has the best diagnostic efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Hu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Da Wei Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Integrated Services Networks, School of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, 2 South Taibai Road, Xi'an, 710071, Shaanxi, China
| | - Cai Xia Fu
- MR Application Development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Thomas Benkert
- MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Chun Yu Jiang
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Rui Ting Li
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Li Ming Wei
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Jun Gong Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yi Shan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| |
Collapse
|