Comparison of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin in Reduction of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE qualification of available evidence

PURPOSE

We aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the impact of a high-dose statin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on short-term outcomes in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

This meta-analysis was based on a search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Journals, and SCOPUS for randomized controlled trials that compared high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with no or low-dose statin administered before planned PCI in statin-naive patients with ACS. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Prespecified subanalyses were performed with respect to statin and ACS type.

RESULTS

A total of eleven trials enrolling 6291 patients were included, of which 75.4% received PCI. High-dose statin loading was associated with an overall 43% relative risk (RR) reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.77) in whole ACS population. This effect was primarily driven by the 39% reduction in the occurrence of MI (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). No significant effect on all-cause mortality reduction was observed (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). In the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), atorvastatin loading was associated with a 33% reduction in MACCE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94), while in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ACS (NSTE-ACS), rosuvastatin loading was associated with 52% reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66). The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE was low to high, depending on the outcome.

CONCLUSION

A high-dose loading of statins before PCI in patients with ACS reduces MACCE and reduces the risk of MI with no impact on mortality at 30 days. Atorvastatin reduces MACCE in STEMI while rosuvastatin reduces MACCE in NSTE-ACS at 30 days.

Comparison of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin in Reduction of Inflammatory Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Introduction: Patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are found to have elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in their blood. These elevated inflammatory markers can lead to complications in ACS. Statins such as atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are known to reduce inflammatory markers. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in reducing inflammatory markers.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized trial was conducted in the cardiovascular department of tertiary care in a rural area of Pakistan. There were 128 patients diagnosed with ACS who were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups, i.e. group A in which patients received 40 mg rosuvastatin daily and group B in which patients received 20 mg atorvastatin daily. hsCRP and ESR were recorded for all the patients at baseline (before starting therapy) and then again after four weeks. The results were compared between both groups.

Result: Out of 128 patients, 113 (88.2%) patients completed the study. According to this study, at the end of four weeks, rosuvastatin reduced hsCRP (p value: < 0.0001) and ESR (p value: 0.015) values significantly more when compared with atorvastatin.

Conclusion: In this study, rosuvastatin was significantly superior to atorvastatin in reducing inflammatory markers such as ESR and hsCRP in patients suffering from ACS. Cardiologists should consider using rosuvastatin rather than atorvastatin in management of patients suffering from ACS with elevated inflammatory biomarkers.