The Use of Computed Tomography Perfusion on Admission to Predict Outcomes in Surgical and Nonsurgical Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Utility of admission perfusion CT for the prediction of suboptimal outcome following uncomplicated minor traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

To compare the perfusion parameters of patients with uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with healthy controls and to assess whether admission perfusion CT parameters can be used to predict outcome at 6 months post-injury in patients with uncomplicated mTBI.

METHODS

Institute ethical committee approval was obtained for this prospective cohort study and informed written consent obtained from all subjects. Patients who sustained mTBI and had no abnormalities on non-contrast CT from June 2010 to January 2012 (20 months) and 10 healthy controls were included and underwent perfusion CT at admission. Outcome was determined at 6 months follow-up using the extended Glasgow Coma Outcome Scale score.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included, of which 16 (32.7%) had symptoms at 6 months post-injury (suboptimal outcome). The mean cerebral blood flow and volume were lower in both the gray and white matter of all three arterial territories in the study group than in the control group (p value < 0.05). In the study group, these values were lower in those with suboptimal outcome than in those with optimal outcome (no symptoms). Cerebral blood flow showed higher area under the curve for predicting the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Perfusion parameters are altered even in patients with uncomplicated mTBI. A single ROI (region of interest) evaluation of the gray matter in the posterior cerebral artery territory on admission perfusion CT could provide a quick and efficient way to predict patients who would have a suboptimal outcome at 6 months post-injury.

Abnormalities on Perfusion CT and Intervention for Intracranial Hypertension in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

The role of invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) remain unclear. Perfusion computed tomography (CTP) provides crucial information about the cerebral perfusion status in these patients. We hypothesised that CTP abnormalities would be associated with the severity of intracranial hypertension (ICH). To investigate this hypothesis, twenty-eight patients with STBI and ICP monitors were investigated with CTP within 48 h from admission. Treating teams were blind to these results. Patients were divided into five groups based on increasing intervention required to control ICH and were compared. Group I required no intervention above routine sedation, group II required a single first tier intervention, group III required multiple different first-tier interventions, group IV required second-tier medical therapy and group V required second-tier surgical therapy. Analysis of the results showed demographics and injury severity did not differ among groups. In group I no patients showed CTP abnormality, while patients in all other groups had abnormal CTP (p = 0.003). Severe ischaemia observed on CTP was associated with increasing intervention for ICH. This study, although limited by small sample size, suggests that CTP abnormalities are associated with the need to intervene for ICH. Larger scale assessment of our results is warranted to potentially avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in head injury patients.