Lipoaspiration for the Treatment of Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Clinical application of magnetic resonance lymphangiography in the vascularized omental lymph nodes transfer with or without lymphaticovenous anastomosis for cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema

Background

The recent increase in the number of patients with lower extremities lymphedema and the development of microsurgery techniques have led to a rise in lymphedema treatment. Vascularized omental lymph node transfer (VOLT), an emerging treatment modality for extremity lymphedema, has shown its unique advantages in reconstructing lymphatic circulation and absorbing exudated lymphatic fluid. Patients who underwent radical tumor resection with/without radiation therapy treatment often present with impairment or degeneration of the inguinal lymph nodes. For such cases, VOLT could provide adequate lymph nodes and tissue to absorb edema fluid in these areas. Therefore, we analyzed the operative outcomes of VOLT under the guidance of magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) in this study, as this individualized and precise surgical procedure could benefit patients and improve their quality of life.

Methods

From November 2021 to September 2022, a total of 14 patients' 19 legs with extremity lymphedema underwent a VOLT with or without lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). Outcomes, including circumference reduction rates, preoperative and postoperative MRL results, and other complications, were analyzed.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 8.86±1.41 months (range, 7-11 months). The mean circumference reduction rates {circumference reduction rate (%) = [1 - (postoperative affected limb - healthy limb)/(preoperative affected limb - healthy limb)] × 100%} of different planes (i.e., ankle, 10 cm above the knee, 10 cm below the knee, 10 cm above the ankle, and 20 cm above the knee) were 15.64%±40.08%, 11.79%±30.69%, 20.25%±24.94%, 7.73%±30.05%, -1.517%±16.75%. Notably, one patient had multi-drug-resistant gram-negative infections, which resulted in the loss of three flaps. The postoperative MRL showed improved lymphatic drainage and lower extremity volume in the remaining 13 cases.

Conclusions

The precision evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes and lower extremities lymphatic system through MRL using VOLT can provide surgeons with a comprehensive understanding and reliable evidence for the treatment of cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema.

Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Background  Lymphedema is an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces resulting from impairment in the lymphatic circulation that can impair quality of life and cause considerable morbidity. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) has an overall incidence rate of 20%. Conservative therapies are the first step in treatment of LEL; however, they do not provide a cure because they fail to address the underlying physiologic dysfunction of the lymphatic system. Among several surgical alternatives, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has gained popularity due to its improved outcomes and less invasive approach. This study aims to review the published literature on LVA for LEL treatment and to analyze the surgical outcomes.

Methods  PubMed database was used to perform a comprehensive literature review of all articles describing LVA for treatment of LEL from Novemeber 1985 to June 2019. Search terms included “lymphovenous” OR “lymphaticovenous” AND “bypass” OR “anastomosis” OR “shunt” AND “lower extremity lymphedema.”

Results  A total of 95 articles were identified in the initial query, out of which 58 individual articles were deemed eligible. The studies included in this review describe notable variations in surgical techniques, number of anastomoses, and supplementary interventions. All, except one study, reported positive outcomes based on limb circumference and volume changes or subjective clinical improvement. The largest reduction rate in limb circumference and volume was 63.8%.

Conclusion  LVA demonstrated a considerable reduction in limb volume and improvement in subjective findings of lymphedema in the majority of patients. The maintained effectiveness of this treatment modality in long-term follow-up suggests great efficacy of LVA in LEL treatment.

Impact of body mass index on long-term surgical outcomes of vascularized lymph node transfer in lymphedema patients

Background

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is a surgical procedure with high interest to treat lymphedema. Body mass index (BMI) is a well-described factor that increases the risk of lymphedema, but little is known about its influence on the surgical outcomes of lymphedema patients who undergo VLNT. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of preoperative BMI on the long-term surgical outcomes after VLNT in lymphedema patients.

Methods

We retrospectively compiled data of patients with International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage II or III lymphedema who were treated with VLNT from July 2010 to July 2016 at China Medical University Hospital. Preoperative and postoperative demographic and clinical data, such as limb circumference and number of infection episodes were reviewed. Statistical analyses compared circumference reduction rates and infection episode reduction between preoperative BMI categories was done. In addition, prediction of outcomes based on quantitative preoperative BMI was analyzed.

Results

A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients (10.8%) were normal weight, 43 (51.8%) were overweight, and 31 (37.3%) were obese. Compared with normal-weight patients, mean circumference reduction rates were significantly lower in overweight (P=0.005) and obese patients (P=0.02), but quantitative BMI was not correlated with circumference reduction rate (P=0.96). However, obese patients had a significantly greater reduction in infection episodes than normal-weight patients (P=0.03). In addition, greater BMI predicted greater reduction in infection episodes after VLNT (P=0.02).

Conclusions

VLNT is an effective surgical treatment, especially for lymphedema patients with higher preoperative BMIs. The results of our study suggest that this procedure considerably decreases the number of postoperative infection episodes per year in obese patients, even though preoperative BMI does not influence circumference reduction rate.